Adaptation of “Sociotropy—Self-Sufficience” Questionnaire for Russian Sample on Middle Adults and Ageing People

530

Abstract

Present paper describes that adaptation of a questionnaire on the sociotropy or own assumptions and goals. Paper presents the results of the psychometric validity of the Russian adaptation of the Questionnaire for middle and older adults. Participants were adults aged 35-75 (N=358; M= 49,27; SD = 11,08; 75,5 % — females). Our adaptation was based on a New Zealand version of the “Socitropy/ Autonomy scale” by A. Beck. To check the criterial validity we used “Differential questionnaire of loneliness experiences”, “Social and emotional loneliness scales for middle and older adults”, “Psychological well-being scale by C. Ryff”. The results of the exploratory and confirmatory analysis identified four subscales: “Social non-confidence”, “Dependence on other’s opinion”, “Affiliation” and “Independence”. Psychometric tests proved that all identified scales had internal consistency, and form a general factor. Final confirmatory analysis showed that four scales are comparatively independent. Analysis of the results in age and sex groups showed that the questionnaire maintained its consistency in age groups (middle adulthood, later adulthood, aging) as well as for males and females. Thus, our results revealed that our adaptation could be used on adults and older adults in Russia.

General Information

Keywords: sociotropy, self-sufficiency, autonomy, dependency from communication, questionnaire adaptation.

Journal rubric: Psychodiagnostics

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2021140315

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-513-18015.

For citation: Strizhitskaya O.Y., Petrash M.D., Murtazina I.R., Vartanyan G.A. Adaptation of “Sociotropy—Self-Sufficience” Questionnaire for Russian Sample on Middle Adults and Ageing People. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2021. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 217–233. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2021140315. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Alexandrova N.H. Sub”ektnost’ na pozdnih etapah ontogeneza [Subjectivity during later life]. Nizhnij Novgorod: Nizhegorodskij gumanitarnyj centr. 2000. 125 s. (In Russ.).
  2. Babakova L.V. Vzaimosvyaz’ mezhdu povsednevnymmi nepriyatnostyami, lichnostymi chertami i udovletvorennost’yu zhizn’yu u pozhilyh lyudej v Bolgarii [Associations between daily hassles, personality traits and life satisfaction in later life in Bulgaria]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Psihologiya Pedagogika, 2015. № 4. s.153—162. (In Russ.).
  3. ZHukovskaya L.V., Troshihina E.G. SHkala psihologicheskogo blagopoluchiya K. Riff [Scale of Psychological well-being by C. Ryff]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2011. T. 32. № 2. S. 82—93. (In Russ.).
  4. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Svyaz’ psihologicheskoj suverennosti i social’nyh verovanij: granicy lichnosti v kontekste «bol’shogo» sociuma [Connection between the psychological sovereignty and social beliefs: personal boundaries in the social world]. Social’naya psihologiya i obshchestvo. 2017. T. 8. № 3. S. 100—114. doi:10.17759/sps.2017080308 (In Russ.).
  5. Osin E.N., Leont’ev D.A. Differencial’nyj oprosnik perezhivaniya odinochestva: struktura i svojstva [Differential questionnaire of loneliness experience: structure and characteristics][Elektronnyj resurs]. Psihologiya. ZHurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2013. T. 10. № 1. S. 55—81. https://psy-journal.hse.ru/ data/2013/10/31/1283223356/Osin_Leontiev_10-01pp55-81.pdf (Accessed: 10.06.2019). (In Russ.).
  6. Psihologicheskaya zrelost’ lichnosti [Psychological personality maturity]/ Pod red. L.A. Golovej. SPb.: Skifiya-print. 2014. 240 s. (In Russ.).
  7. Rasskazova E.I. Psihologicheskaya samoregulyaciya kak faktor uspeshnosti   upravleniya povedeniem v razlichnyh sferah funkcionirovaniya lichnosti [Psychological self-regulation as factor of success in the management of own behavior in different life domains]. Eksperimental’naya psihologiya. 2019. T. 12. №. 3. S. 148—163. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2019120312 doi:10.17759/sps.2017080308 (In Russ.).
  8. Strizhickaya O.YU., Petrash M.D., Murtazina I.R., Vartanyan G.A., Manevskij F.S., Aleksandrova N.H., Babakova L.V. Adaptaciya bolgarskoj versii shkaly social’nogo i emocional’nogo odinochestva (SELSA-S) dlya vzroslyh i pozhilyh lyudej [Adaptation of the Bulgarian Version of the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale (Short Form) for Adults and Older Adults]. Konsul’tativnaya psihologiya i psihoterapiya. 2020. T. 28. No 4. S. 79—97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280405 (In Russ.).
  9. Akgün B.M., Hiçdurmaz D., Öz F. The investigation of learned resourcefulness in terms of locus of control, sociotropy-autonomy personality traits, and demographic and professional variables in nurses. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing / Psikiyatri Hemsireleri Dernegi, 2019. Vol. 10. № 3. P. 155—164. DOI: 10.14744/phd.2019.21549
  10. Bieling P.J., Beck A.T., Brown G.K. The Sociotropy—Autonomy Scale: Structure and Implications. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 2000. Vol. 24. № 6. P. 763—780. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005599714224.
  11. Cappeliez P. The relationship between sociotropy and autonomy and the five factor model of personality. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1993. Vol. 32. № 1. P. 78—80. doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993. tb01030.x
  12. Carstensen L.L., Fung  H.H.,  Charles  S.T.  Socioemotional  Selectivity  Theory  and  the  Regulation of Emotion in the Second Half of Life. Motivation & Emotion, 2003. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 103—123. doi. org/10.1023/A:1024569803230.
  13. Connor-Smith J., Compas B.E. Vulnerability to Social Stress: Coping as a Mediator or Moderator of Sociotropy and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2002. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 39—55. DOI:10.1023/A:1013889504101.
  14. Craven J.M. Sociotropy and Autonomy in Older Adults and the Relationships between the Personality Styles, Social Support, and Affect. // A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology at Massey University. 2007. Palmerston North. 232 p.
  15. Dasch K.B., Cohen L.H., Sahl J.C., Gunthert K.C. Moderating Effects of Sociotropy and Autonomy on Affective and Self-esteem Reactivity to Daily Stressors. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2008. Vol. 32. № 2. p. 177—195. doi.org/10.1007/s10608-007-9126-1.
  16. Husky M.M., Grondin O.S., Compagnone P.D. Validation de la version française du questionnaire de Sociotropie-Autonomie de Beck et collègues. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2004. Vol. 49. № 12. P. 851— 858. DOI:10.1177/070674370404901209.
  17. Mackenzie C.S., Karaoylas E.C., Starzyk K.B. Lifespan Differences in a Self Determination Theory Model of Eudaimonia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2018. Vol. 19. № 8. P. 2465—2487. doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9932-4
  18. Otani K., Suzuki A., Matsumoto Y., Shirata T. Marked differences in core beliefs about self and others, between sociotropy and autonomy: personality vulnerabilities in the cognitive model of depression. Neuropsychiatric Disease & Treatment, 2018. Vol. 14. P. 863—866. doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S161541.
  19. Şahin N., Ulusoy M., Şahin N. Exploring the sociotropy-autonomy dimensions in a sample of Turkish psychiatric inpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003. Vol. 59. № 10. P. 1055—1068. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679.
  20. Sato T. Sociotropy and Autonomy: The Nature of Vulnerability. Journal of Psychology, 2003. Vol. 137. № 5. P. 447—466. doi.org/10.1080/00223980309600627.
  21. Sato T., McCann, D. Sociotropy—autonomy and the Beck Depression Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2000. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 66—76. DOI: 10.1027//1015-5759.16.1.66
  22. Toro Tobar R.A., Vargas Rubio C.V. Escala De Sociotropía-Autonomía (Sas): Propiedades Psicométricas De La Adaptación a Colombia. Psicogente, 2014. Vol. 13. № 2. P. 323—336.
  23. Yang K., Girgus J.S. Are Women More Likely than Men Are to Care Excessively about Maintaining Positive Social Relationships? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Gender Difference in Sociotropy. Sex Roles, 2019. Vol. 81. № 3/4. P. 157—172. DOI: 10.1007/s11199-018-0980-y

Information About the Authors

Olga Y. Strizhitskaya, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Head of the Department of Developmental Psychology and Differential Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-162X, e-mail: o.strizhitskaya@spbu.ru

Marina D. Petrash, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-7289, e-mail: m.petrash@spbu.ru

Inna R. Murtazina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2204-4376, e-mail: i.r.myrtazina@spbu.ru

Gayane A. Vartanyan, PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-4713, e-mail: g.vartanyan@spbu.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 975
Previous month: 34
Current month: 29

Downloads

Total: 530
Previous month: 15
Current month: 25