Skip to Main Content

Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2022. Vol. 15, no. 3, 50–69
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2022150304
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)

Representation of the Value Orientations of a Stranger Depending on the Method of the Face Imaging

105

V.A. Barabanschikov, A.S. Shunto

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The observers’ ideas about the value orientations of visual communicants were experimentally studied. The subjects were sequentially presented in random order with the faces of people depicted in photographs and artistic portraits. It was required, on the basis of a list of terminal and instrumental value orientations (M. Rokeach), first to evaluate one’s own beliefs, then the demonstrated characters. It is shown that the integral profiles of value ideas about personalities depicted in portraits and photos are well matched, have a similar structure and similar scores. The beliefs of characters in portraits are statistically higher than those in photographs. The effect is preserved when the values are differentiated by categories. Significant differences were obtained in relation to the following values: terminal values — Cognition, Mature love, Material wellbeing, Beauty, Happy family life, Pleasures; instrumental — Goodupbringing, Education, Diligence, Tolerance, Sensitivity, Cheerfulness. The observers’ ideas about their own values differ significantly from the value orientations of the depicted people and have little effect on their assessments.

General Information

Keywords: interpersonal perception, perception of facial expressions, forms of presentation of the content of a person in an artistic portrait and photograph, visual assessment of a person’s value orientations, self-assessment of the perceiver

Journal rubric: Face Science

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150304

Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 18-18-00350P «Perception in the structure of non-verbal communication».

Received: 13.09.2022

Accepted:

For citation: Barabanschikov V.A., Shunto A.S. Representation of the Value Orientations of a Stranger Depending on the Method of the Face Imaging. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2022. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 50–69. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2022150304. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Artemyeva E.Yu. Psikhologiya subyektivnoy semantiki [Psychology of subjective semantics]. M.: MGU, 1980. (In Russ.).
  2. Barabanschikov V.A. Vospriyatiye vyrazheniy litsa [Perception of facial expressions]. M.: Izd-vo IP RAN, 2009. (In Russ.).
  3. Barabanshchikov V.A. Konfiguracionnye otnosheniya lica kak istochnik informacii o lichnosti cheloveka [Configuration relations of a face as a source of information about a person’s personality] // Eksperimental’naya psihologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2019. T. 12. № 3. P. 28—46. (In Russ.).
  4. Barabanshchikov V.A., ZHegallo A.V., Korol’kova O.A. Perceptivnaya kategorizaciya vyrazhenij lica [Perceptual categorization of facial expressions]. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2016. (In Russ.).
  5. Barabanschikov V.A., Lupenko E.A., Shunto A.S. Vospriyatiye lichnosti cheloveka po izobrazheniyu yego litsa na fotografii i khudozhestvennom portrete [Perception of a person’s personality in the image of his face in a photograph and an artistic portrait] // Eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2017. T. 10. № 4. P. 56—73. (In Russ.).
  6. Barabanschikov V.A., Lupenko E.A., Shunto A.S. Predstavleniye o lichnosti cheloveka, izobrazhennogo na khudozhestvennom portrete i fotografii [Representation of the personality of a person depicted in an artistic portrait and photography] // Eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2019. T. 12. № 3. P. 5—18. (In Russ.).
  7. Barabanschikov V.A., Maynina I.N. Otsenka «glubinnykh» individual’no-psikhologicheskikh osobennostey yego cheloveka po fotoizobrazheniyu litsa [Evaluation of the “deep” individual psychological characteristics of his person according to the photo image of the face] // Eksperimentalnaya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2010. T. 3. № 4. P. 50—71. (In Russ.).
  8. Besprozvannaya I.I., Barabanschikov V.A. Sledy lichnosti na skhematicheskom izobrazhenii lica [Traces of personality on a schematic image of a face] // Eksperimental’naya psihologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2019. T. 12. № 2. P. 16—34. (In Russ.).
  9. Bubnova S.S. Tsennostnyye oriyentatsii lichnosti kak mnogomernaya nelineynaya sistema [Value Orientations of a Personality as a Multidimensional Nonlinear System] // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 1999. T. 20. № 5. P. 38—44. (In Russ.).
  10. Zhuravleva N.A. Tsennostnyye oriyentatsii lichnosti v izmenyayushchemsya rossiyskom obshchestve [Value Orientations of the Personality in a Changing Russian Society] // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal]. 2012. T. 33. № 1. P. 30—39. (In Russ.).
  11. Kaptsov A.V. Diagnostika lichnostnykh proyavleniy I struktury Vestaksiologicheskoy obolochki [Diagnosis of personality manifestations and the structure of the Vestaxiological shell] // Samarskoy gumanitarnoy akademii. Seriya «Psikhologiya» [Samara Humanitarian Academy. Series “Psychology”]. 2008. T. 3. № 1. P. 135—155. (In Russ.).
  12. Kuznetsova Yu.M. Strukturnyye I soderzhatel’nyye kharakteristiki tsennostnykh obrazovaniy lichnosti [Structural and content characteristics of personality’s value formations]. Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk. M.: Moskovskiy institute otkrytogo obrazovaniya, 2006. (In Russ.).
  13. Kurakova O.A., Zhegallo A.V. Effekt kategorial’nosti obnaruzheniya ekspressiy litsa: mnogoobraziye proyavleniy [The effect of categoriality in the detection of facial expressions: a variety of manifestations] // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. 2012. T. 5. № 2. P. 22—38. (In Russ.).
  14. Leontyev D.A. Tsennostnyye predstavleniya v individual’nom I gruppovom soznanii: vidy, determinant I izmeneniya vo vremeni [Value representations in individual and group consciousness: types, determinants and changes in time] // Psikhologicheskoye obozreniye [Psychological Review]. 1998. № 1. P. 13—25. (In Russ.).
  15. Lupenko E.A. Portretnoye izobrazheniye cheloveka kak predmet psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya: problem I issledovatel’skiye podkhody [Portrait image of a person as a subject of psychological research: problems and research approaches] // Litso cheloveka v nauke, iskusstve i praktike [Person’s face in science, art and practice] / Otv. red. K.I. Ananyeva, V. A. Barabanschikov, A. A. Demidov. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2014. P. 269—283. (In Russ.).
  16. Lupenko E.A. Predstavleniye o lichnosti cheloveka po portretnomu izobrazheniyu [The idea of a person’s personality in a portrait image] // Kognitivnyye mekhanizmy neverbal’noy kommunikatsii [Cognitive mechanisms of non-verbal communication] Pod red. V. A. Barabanschikova. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2017. P. 265—303. (In Russ.).
  17. Matematicheskaya psikhologiya: Shkola V. Yu. Krylova [Mathematical psychology: School of V.Yu. Krylov] / Pod red. A.L. Zhuravleva, T.N. Savchenko, G.M. Golovinoy. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2010. (In Russ.).
  18. Nikitina E.A. Napravleniye lits na portretakh [The direction of faces in portraits] // Litso cheloveka v prostranstve obshcheniya [A person’s face in the space of communication] / Otv. red. K.I. Ananyeva, V.A. Barabanschikov, A.A. Demidov. M.: Kogito-Tsentr, 2016. P. 157—171. (In Russ.).
  19. Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika [Psychological diagnostics] / Pod red. M.K. Akimovoy. SPb.: Piter, 2005. (In Russ.).
  20. Yarina Ye.V. Teoreticheskiy analiz ponyatiy «tsennosti» i «tsennostnyye oriyentatsii» [Theoretical analysis of the concepts of “values” and “value orientations”] // Uchenyye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Uchenye zapiski Oryol State University], 2014. T. 61. № 5. P. 160—162. (In Russ.).
  21. Bruce V., Young A. In the eye of beholder. The science of face perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  22. Ekman P., Friesen W. Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto: Consulting psychologists Press, 1976.
  23. Farcane N., Deliu D., Bureană E. A Corporate Case Study: The Application of Rokeach’s Value System to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) // Sustainability, 2019, 11. DOI:10.3390/su11236612
  24. Farago С. The face of the other: the particular versus the individual // Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 2018, Vol. 12. № 2. P. 289—313.
  25. Kramer R., Mileva M., Ritchie K. Inter-rater agreement in trait judgements from faces // PLOS ONE, August 17, 2018. P. 1—17. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202655
  26. Musil B., Rus V., Musek J. The Rokeach Value Survey in comparative study of Japanese and Slovenian students: Towards the underlying structure // Studia Psychologica, 2009. 51. P. 53—68.
  27. Rokeach M. The nature of human values. N.Y., Free Press, 1973.
  28. Todorov A., Oosterhof N. Modeling Social Perception of Faces // IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 2011. № 28. P. 117—122.

Information About the Authors

Vladimir A. Barabanschikov, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Director, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Dean of the Faculty of Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5084-0513, e-mail: vladimir.barabanschikov@gmail.com

Anna S. Shunto, Lecturer, Department of General Psychology, Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7985-4890, e-mail: a.shunto@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 400
Previous month: 28
Current month: 22

Downloads

Total: 105
Previous month: 5
Current month: 1