On the Adequacy of Psychophysical Measurements



The laws of Fechner and Stevens are the main psychophysical laws. The difficulty lies in the fact that the laws of Fechner and Stevens do not coincide. There are many ways to explain this contradiction. But the problem of the adequacy of psychophysical measurements has not been solved. The fact is that Fechner and Stevens define the method of measurement differently. But only the definition of Stevens is taken as a basis in the representative theory of measurements, which was developed initially as a theory of psychophysical measurements. There are a number of shortcomings in the representative theory. In particular, there is no built — in mechanism for verifying the adequacy of measurement results. Therefore, there are doubts about the quantitative nature of psychological attributes. And the question remains unresolved: what to do with Fechner’s law. In order to develop a quantitative measurement theory, a rating theory was proposed. From the standpoint of the rating theory, both psychophysical laws are equal and differ in the way of measurement. It is shown that the measurement results obtained by different methods are equivalent in a certain sense. The theoretical justification of equivalence is the isomorphism of algebraic structures. Such a solution to the Fechner-Stevens problem is constructive since it contains the possibility of experimental verification of the adequacy of the measurement results. An example of subjective measurement is considered in different ways. The example includes a procedure for checking adequacy.

General Information

Keywords: representative measurement theory, psychophysical measurements, Fechner’s law, Stevens law, adequacy, rating method

Journal rubric: Research Methods

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150314

Received: 02.12.2020


For citation: Romanchuk V.M. On the Adequacy of Psychophysical Measurements. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2022. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 213–221. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2022150314. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Zabrodin Yu.M., LebedeV A.N. Psihofiziologiya i psihofizika [Psychophysiology and psychophysics]. Moscow: “Nauka,” 1977. (In Russ.).
  2. Kurosh A.G. Lekcii po obshhej Algebre [Lectures on General algebra]. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 1973. 400 p.
  3. Romancak V.M. Measurement of non-physical quantity. Sistemnyj analiz I prikladnaja informatika [System analysis and applied Informatics]. 2017. No. 4, pp. 39—44. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  4. Romanchak V.M. Subjective measurements (rating theory). Journal of the Belarusian State University. Philosophy and Psychology. 2020. No. 3, pp. 87—98. (In Russ.).
  5. Skotnikova I.G. Psychology of sensory processes. Psychophysics. Psychology of the XXI century / Ed. by V. N. Druzhinin. M.: Per Se, 2003. P. 117—168. (In Russ.).
  6. Lindsay P., Norman D. Processing of Information in Humans: transl. from English. New York: Wiley, 1974. 550 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Cook M.L. The Power Law as a Special Case of Fechner’s Law. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1967. Vol. 25. No. 10, pp. 51—52.
  8. Ekman G. Is the power law a special case of Fechner’s law? Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1964, Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 730.
  9. Fechner G.T. Elements of psychophysics (H. E. Adler, Trans.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 1966. (Original work published 1860).
  10. Gescheider G.A. Psychophysics: The Fundamentals, 3rd Edition. London, Psychology Press, 2015. 446 p.
  11. Grondin S. Psychology of Perception. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016. 156 p. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-31791-5
  12. Krantz D.M., Luce R.D., Suppes P., Tversky A. Foundation of measurement. Vol 1. N.Y.: Academic Press, 1971.
  13. Krueger L.E. Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a united psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 251—267.
  14. Lubashevsky I. Psychophysical laws as reflection of mental space properties. Phys Life Rev. 2019. Vol. 31. P. 276—303.
  15. Luce R.D. A way to blend Fechner and Stevens. Fechner Day Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the international society of psychophysics / In E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, & T. Lachmann (Eds.). Pabst Science Publishers, 2001. P. 28—35.
  16. Michell J. Is psychometrics pathological science? Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective. 2008. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 7—24.
  17. Michell J. Measurement in Psychology: A Critical History of a Methodological Concept. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University, 1999. 268 p.
  18. Norwich K.H., Wong W. Unification of psychophysical phenomena: The complete form of Fechner’s law. Perception & Psychophysics, 1997. Vol. 59. № 6. P. 929—940.
  19. Stevens S.S. Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. Handbook of experimental psychology / Ed. S.S. Stevens. New York: Wiley, 1951.
  20. Stevens S.S. On the Psychophysical Law. Psychological Review. 1957. Vol. 64. № 3. P. 153—181.

Information About the Authors

Vasily M. Romanchuk, PhD in Physics and Matematics, Associate professor, Chair of “Engineering mathematics”, Belarusian national technical University, Minsk, Belarus, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9687-2919, e-mail: romanchak@bntu.by



Total: 347
Previous month: 32
Current month: 21


Total: 78
Previous month: 3
Current month: 5