Role of Causal Attribution and State Self-Esteem in Emergence of Brand Commitment

Based on the analysis of Kisler's commitment model and Weiner's attribution theory, a hypothetical chain of events resulting in brand commitment was offered: focus of attention → causal dimension → self-esteem → commitment. Its existence was tested in two studies that manipulated the focus of attention of participants in order to strengthen the weight of one of the two causal dimensions, attribution of choice results to internal/external causes (Experiment 1) and attribution of choice results to stable/unstable causes (Experiment 2). 60 students (29 men) and 72 students (29 men), respectively participated in studies. Results were analyzed using ANOVA and path analysis and supported the existence of the assumed chain of events resulting in commitment in both studies. At the same time, as expected, such a chain of events was more pronounced in the situation of success in Experiment 1 and in the situation of failure in Experiment 2. The advantages of using the attribution theory to explain the commitment and prospects for further research in this area are discussed.

1. Ahluwalia R. Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 2000. Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 217—232. DOI:10.1086/314321
2. Ahluwalia R., Burnkrant R.E., Unnava H.R. Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 2000. Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 203—214. DOI:10.1509/jmkr.37.2.203.18734
3. Beatty S.E., Kahle L.R. Alternative hierarchies of the attitude-behavior relationship: The impact of brand commitment and habit. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1988. Vol. 16, no 2, pp. 1—10. DOI:10.1007/BF02723310
4. Beatty S.E., Kahle L.R., Homer P. The involvement-commitment model: Theory and implications. Journal of Business Research, 1988. Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 149—167. DOI:10.1016/0148-2963(88)90039-2
5. Campbell W.K., Sedikides C. Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 1999. Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23—43. DOI:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23
6. Choi B., Ahluwalia R. Determinants of brand switching: the role of consumer inferences, brand commitment, and perceived risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2013. Vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 981—991. DOI:10.1111/jasp.12062
7. Crosby L.A., Taylor J.R. Psychological commitment and its effects on post-decision evaluation and preference stability among voters. Journal of Consumer Research, 1983. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 413—431. DOI:10.1086/208935
8. Desai K.K., Raju S. Adverse influence of brand commitment on consideration of and preference for competing brands. Psychology & Marketing, 2007. Vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 595—614. DOI:10.1002/mar.20175
9. Dunning D. Trait importance and modifiability as factors influencing self-assessment and self-enhancement motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995. Vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1297—1306. DOI:10.1177/01461672952112007
10. Duval T.S., Silvia P.J. Self-awareness and causal attribution: A dual-systems theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2001. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-1489-3
11. Duval T.S., Silvia P.J. Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002. Vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 49—61. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.49
12. Duval T.S., Wicklund R.A. A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
13. Gendolla G.H.E., Koller M. Surprise and motivation of causal search: How are they affected by outcome valence and importance? Motivation and Emotion, 2001. Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 327—349. DOI:10.1023/A:1014867700547
14. Grossbart S., Gill J., Laczniak R.N. Influence of brand commitment and claim strategy on consumer attitudes. Advances in Consumer Research, 1987. Vol. 14, pp. 510—513.
15. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958. DOI:10.1037/10628-000
16. Kelley H.H. The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 1973. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 107—128. DOI:10.1037/h0034225
17. Kelley H.H., Michela J.L. Attribution theory and research. In M.R. Rosenzweig, L.W. Porter (Eds.). Annual review of psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, 1980. Vol. 31, pp. 457—501. DOI:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325
18. Kiesler C.A. The psychology of commitment. Experiments linking behavior to belief. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
19. Kiesler C.A., Sakumura J. A test of a model for commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966. Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 349—353. DOI:10.1037/h0022943
20. Lastovicka J.L., Gardner D.M. Components of involvement. In J.C. Maloney, B. Silverman (Eds.). Attitude research plays for high stakes. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, 1979. Pp. 53—73.
21. Lewin K. Group decision and social change. In T. Newcomb & E. Hartley (Eds.). Readings in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, 1947. Pp. 197—211.
22. Mayer F.S., Duval S., Duval V.H. An attributional analysis of commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980. Vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1072—1080. DOI:10.1037/h0077726
23. McFarland C., Ross M. Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982. Vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 937—946. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.937
24. Mezulis A.H., Abramson L.Y., Hyde J.S., Hankin B.L. Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 2004. Vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 711—747. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
25. Mittal B. A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement. Psychology & Marketing, 1995. Vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 663—682. DOI:10.1002/mar.4220120708
26. Oliver R.L. Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective of the consumer. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.
27. Pritchard M.P., Havitz M.E., Howard D.R. Analyzing the commitment—loyalty link in service contexts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1999. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 333—348. DOI:10.1177/0092070399273004
28. Raju S., Unnava H.R. Brand commitment and size of the consideration set. Advances in Consumer Research, 2005. Vol. 32, pp. 151—152.
29. Raju S., Unnava H.R. The Mediating role of arousal in brand commitment. Advances in Consumer Research, 2006. Vol. 33, pp. 517—518.
30. Raju S., Unnava H.R., Montgomery N.V. The effect of brand commitment on the evaluation of nonpreferred brands: A disconfirmation process. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009a. Vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 851—863. DOI:10.1086/592816
31. Raju S., Unnava H.R., Montgomery N.V. The moderating effect of brand commitment on the evaluation of competitive brands. Journal of Advertising, 2009b. Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 21—35. DOI:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380202
32. Srivastava P., Owens D.L. Personality traits and their effect on brand commitment: an empirical investigation. The Marketing Management Journal, 2010. Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 15—27.
33. Weiner B. An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
34. Weiner B. An attributional theory of motivation. In P.A.M. Van Lange, A.W. Kruglanski & E.T. Higgins. Handbook of theories of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2012. Vol. 1, pp. 135—155. DOI:10.4135/9781446249215