Russian-Language Version of the Moral Identity Questionnaire

Moral identity, according to theoretical concepts, plays an important role in motivating moral behaviour. At the same time, empirical studies of moral identity are hampered by the lack of appropriate instruments. The purpose of this work is to develop a Russian-language inventory based on the Moral Identity Questionnaire (MIQ) by J. Black and W. Reynolds, which includes two scales: Moral Self and Moral Integrity. The Moral Integrity Scale measures the desire for consistency between one's moral impulses and actions, while the Moral Self Scale measures how strong one's identification with moral values is. In the study on a sample of 322 students (79% female, mean age M = 21,05; SD = 6,55) good internal consistency of the scales was shown (Cronbach's α coefficients were 0.77 and 0.80). The results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirm the structure of the questionnaire, composed of two factors relevant to the scales. The results of the validity analysis showed that indicators of moral identity are directly related to moral foundations, agreeability, indicators of empathy, as well as identified, internal and introjected motivation for moral actions. Also, the expected negative correlations of indicators of moral identity with moral disengagement, traits of the dark triad, egoism, propensity to academic dishonesty and amotivation of moral actions were revealed. No gender differences were found on the scales of moral identity, while a weak direct relationship of all scales with age was revealed. Thus, as a result of the study, a Russian-language moral identity questionnaire was developed, which can be useful in further research on the role of identity in motivating moral behaviour.

1. Gizhitskii V.V. Uchebnyi obman kak strategiya psevdoadaptivnogo povedeniya u starsheklassnikov [Cheating as Maladaptive Behavior Strategy of High School Students]. Uchenye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo Seriya: Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki = Scientific notes ofOrel State University, 2014. Vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 293—299. (In Russ.).
2. Karyagina T.D., Kukhtova N.V. Test empatii M. Devisa: soderzhatel'naya validnost' i adaptatsiya v mezhkul'turnom kontekste [M. Davis Empathy Test: Content Validity and Adaptation in Cross-сulturalСontext]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2016. Vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 33—61. DOI:10.17759/cpp.2016240403. (In Russ.).
3. Kozlova M.A., Kozlov A.I. Istoki morali, orientirovannoi na individa i gruppu: sotsial'no-psikhologicheski i estestvenno-nauchnyi aspekty [The Origins of Individual-oriented and Group-oriented Morality: Social-psychological and Scientific Aspects]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2016. Vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 60—70. (In Russ.).
4. Kornilova T.V., Kornilov S.A., Chumakova M.A., Talmach M.S. Metodika diagnostiki lichnostnykh chert «Temnoi triady»: aprobatsiya oprosnika Temnaya Dyuzhina [The Dark Triad Personality Traits Measure: Approbation of the Dirty Dozen Questionnaire]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2015. Vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 99—112. (In Russ.).
5. Ledovaya A., Tikhonov R.V., Bogolyubova O.N., Kazennaya E.V., SorokinaYu.L. Otchuzhdenie moral'noi otvetstvennosti: psikhologicheskii konstrukt i metody ego izmereniya [Moral Disengagement: the Psychological Construct and its Measurement]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya = Vestnik of St Petersburg University. Series 16. Psychology and Education, 2016. No. 4, pp. 23—39. DOI:10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.402 (In Russ.).
6. Meshkova N.V., Enikolopov S.N., Kudryavtsev V.T., Bochkova M.N., Meshkov I.A. O prediktorakh negativnoi kreativnosti u vzroslykh na primere kursantov [Predictors of Negative Creativity in Adults on the Example of Cadets]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2021. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 90—108. DOI:10.17759/psylaw.2021110407. (In Russ.).
7. Muzdybaev K. Egoizm lichnosti [Personal Egoism]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2000. Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 27—39. (In Russ.).
8. Osin E.N. Problema sotsial'noi zhelatel'nosti v issledovaniyakh lichnostnogo potentsiala [The problem of social desirability in the research of personal potential]. Lichnostnyi potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal Potential: Structure and diagnostics]. Moscow: Smysl publ., 2011, pp. 454—468. (In Russ.).
9. Sychev O.A., Protasova I.N., Belousov K.I. Diagnostika moral'nykh osnovanii: aprobatsiya russkoyazychnoi versii oprosnika MFQ [Diagnosing Moral Foundations: Testing of the Russian Version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire]. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Psychological Journal, 2018. Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 88—115. DOI:10.21702/rpj.2018.3.5 (In Russ.).
10. Shmeleva E.D. Plagiat i spisyvanie v rossiiskikh vuzakh: rol' obrazovatel'noi sredy i individual'nykh kharakteristik studenta [Plagiarism and Cheating in Russian Universities: The Role of the Learning Environment and Personal Characteristics of Students]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow, 2016. 1, pp. 84—109. DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-84-109 (In Russ.).
11. Abbasi-Asl R., Hashemi S. Personality and Morality: Role of the Big Five Personality Traits in Predicting the Four Components of Moral Decision Making. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 2019. Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 123—128.
12. Aquino K., Reed A. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002. Vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1423—1440. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1423
13. Bergman R. Identity as motivation: Toward a theory of the moral self. In K. Lapsley, D. Narvaez (eds.). Moral development, self, and identity: Vol. 2. New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2004. Pp. 21—46.
14. Black J.E., Reynolds W.M. Development, reliability, and validity of the Moral Identity Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016. Vol. 97, pp. 120—129. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.041
15. Blasi A. Moral identity: Its Role in Moral Functioning. In W.M. Kurtines, J.L. Gewirtz (eds). Morality, moral behavior, and moral development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984. 128—139.
16. Decety J., Cowell J.M. The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2014. Vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 337—339. DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008
17. Hertz S.G., Krettenauer T. Does Moral Identity Effectively Predict Moral Behavior?: A Meta-Analysis. Review of General Psychology, 2016. Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 129—140. DOI:10.1037/gpr0000062
18. Krettenauer T. Moral identity as a goal of moral action: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 2020. Vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 330—345. DOI:10.1080/03057240.2019.1698414
19. Lefebvre J.P., Krettenauer T. Linking Moral Identity With Moral Emotions: A Meta-Analysis. Review of General Psychology, 2019. Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 444—457. DOI:10.1177/1089268019880887
20. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications, 2017. 756 p.
21. Shchebetenko S.A. “The best man in the world”: attitudes toward personality traits. Journal ofHigher School of Economics, 2014. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 129—148.
22. Sheldon K.M., Osin E.N., Gordeeva T.O., Suchkov D.D., Sychev O.A. Evaluating the Dimensionality of Self-Determination Theory’s Relative Autonomy Continuum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2017. 43, no. 9, pp. 1215—1238. DOI:10.1177/0146167217711915