Creative Abilities and Incubation: The Poincaré Effect

1

Abstract

Incubation is a period during which a subject temporarily makes no conscious attempts to solve a problem but eventually arrives at a solution. Henri Poincaré described cases where insights came after a break from working on complex mathematical problems. This article proposes a hypothesis called the «Poincaré effect»: the higher a person's creativity, the more pronounced the effect of incubation in their creative process. An experimental study was conducted with 525 participants divided into a control group (without incubation) and an experimental group (with an incubation break). Participants performed the «Alternate Uses» test, inventing non-standard ways to use a matchstick. Creativity was assessed based on fluency (the number of ideas) and originality. The results showed that the incubation break led to a significant increase in the fluency of responses in the experimental group. Moreover, among participants with a high level of creativity, incubation contributed to an increase in the originality of responses, confirming the Poincaré effect. These findings align with the awareness model, according to which incubation helps restructure the problem representation and recognize previously found unconscious solutions. The study's conclusions confirm the presence of the Poincaré effect in the phenomenon of incubation and highlight the importance of individual creative abilities in the problem-solving process.

General Information

Keywords: сreativity, creativeness, incubation, awareness model, originality, fluency, divergent thinking, "Alternate Uses" test

Journal rubric: Psychology of Thinking

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2024170405

Funding. The article was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation, project number № 22-18-00704.

Received: 24.10.2024

Accepted:

For citation: Valueva E.A., Ushakov D.V. Creative Abilities and Incubation: The Poincaré Effect. Eksperimental'naâ psihologiâ = Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2024. Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 80–89. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2024170405. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Allahverdov V.M. Neizbezhnyj put' tvorchestva: ot inkubacii k insajtu. Tvorchestvo: ot biologicheskih osnovanij k social'nym i kul'turnym fenomenam / Pod red. D.V. Ushakova. M.: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN», 2011. Pp. 175—187. (In Russ.).
  2. Valueva E.A. Rol' inkubacionnogo perioda v reshenii zadach. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2016. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp.789—800. DOI:10.17323/1813-8918-2016-4-789-800 (In Russ.).
  3. Valueva E.A., Ushakov D.V. Insajt i inkubaciya v myshlenii: rol' processov osoznavaniya. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal, 2017. No. 63, pp. 19—35. (In Russ.).
  4. Vladimirov I.Yu. Insajtnoe reshenie kak process preodoleniya fiksirovannosti. M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2024. (In Russ.).
  5. Korovkin S.Yu. Myslitel'nye skhemy v insajtnom reshenii zadach. M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2024. (In Russ.).
  6. Lyubart T. Psihologiya kreativnosti. M.: «Kogito-centr», 2009. (In Russ.).
  7. Ponomarev Ya.A. Psihologiya tvorchestva M.: Nauka, 1976. (In Russ.).
  8. Puankare A. Matematicheskoe tvorchestvo. Psihologiya myshleniya / Pod red. Yu.B. Gippenrejter, V.V. Petuhova. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1981. Pp. 356—365. (In Russ.).
  9. Puankare A. O nauke. M.: Nauka, 1990. (In Russ.).
  10. Bors D.A., Stokes T.L. Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for First-Year University Students and the Development of a Short Form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998. Vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 382—398.
  11. Friston K. Functional integration and inference in the brain. Progress in Neurobiology, 2002. Vol. 68(2), pp. 113—143.
  12. Gallate J., Wong C., Ellwood S., Roring R.W., Snyder A. Creative people use nonconscious processes to their advantage. Creativity Research Journal, 2012. Vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 146—151.
  13. Gilhooly K.J., Georgiou G.J., Garrison J., Reston J.D., Sirota M. Don’t wait to incubate: Immediate versus delayed incubation in divergent thinking. Memory and Cognition, 2012. Vol. 40, pp. 966—975. DOI:10.3758/s13421-012-0199-z
  14. Smith S.M. Incubation. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Second Edition, 2011. Vol. 1, pp. 653—657. DOI:10.1787/9789264173781-en
  15. Stoet G. PsyToolkit: A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 2017. Vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 24—31.           
  16. Stoet G. PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods. Springer-Verlag, 2010. Vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1096—1104.   
  17. Strick M., Dijksterhuis A., Bos M.W., Sjoerdsma A., VanBaaren R.B., Nordgren L.F. A meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects. Soc. Cogn., 2011. Vol. 29, pp. 738—762. DOI:10.1521/SOCO.2011.29.6.738
  18. Yoon S.Y. Psychometric properties of the Revised Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (The Revised PSVT:R) (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Order Number: 3480934), 2011.

Information About the Authors

Ekaterina A. Valueva, PhD in Psychology, Research Fellow, The Laboratory of the Psychology and Psychophysiology of Creativity, Institute of Psychology of RAS, Leading Research Fellow, Center of Applied Psychological and Pedagogical Studies, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-287X, e-mail: ekval@list.ru

Dmitry V. Ushakov, Doctor of Psychology, Director, Institute of Psychology RAS (FGBI IP RAS), Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-1545, e-mail: dv.ushakov@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 10
Previous month: 8
Current month: 2

Downloads

Total: 1
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0