Experimental Psychology (Russia)
2025. Vol. 18, no. 3, 178–193
doi:10.17759/exppsy.2025180312
ISSN: 2072-7593 / 2311-7036 (online)
Adaptation of the Russian version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale
Abstract
Context and relevance. There is a lack of Russian-language methods for determining attitudes toward factors common to different types of vaccination. Objective. This article is focused on testing the psychometric properties of the translated Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale of L.R. Martin & K.J. Petrie. The scale includes subscales of mistrust of vaccine benefit, worries about unforeseen future effects, concerns about commercial profiteering, and preference for natural immunity. Methods and materials. The study was conducted in an online survey format; the sample was collected by gender-age quotas and totaled 400 individuals. To check the construct validity, we used a scale measuring attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination and a questionnaire on conspiracy beliefs about vaccination. To check the criterion validity, behavioral indicators were used: voluntariness of COVID-19 vaccination and other diseases, experience of complications and worsening of well-being after COVID-19 vaccination, and planning for future COVID-19 vaccination. Results. The validity check yielded the expected correlations with the scales and indicators used. Internal consistency was 0.899. Conclusions. The Russian version of the VAX scale showed high internal consistency and a stable factor structure, its construct and criterion validity were confirmed.
General Information
Keywords: vaccination, attitudes towards vaccination, anti-vaccinationism, vaccination refusal, attitudes, COVID-19
Journal rubric: Psychodiagnostics
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2025180312
Funding. The research is funded by Russian Science Foundation, project number 23-78-10035, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-78-10035/.
Received 17.09.2024
Revised 31.01.2025
Accepted
Published
For citation: Syromiatnikova, A.Yu., Mararitsa, L.V., Artemenko, E.D. (2025). Adaptation of the Russian version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 18(3), 178–193. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2025180312
© Syromiatnikova A.Yu., Mararitsa L.V., Artemenko E.D., 2025
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
References
- Абдурахманова, Э.М., Александрова, Е.А., Звягинцев, Р.С., Керша, Ю.Д. (2021). Недоверие к вакцинации через призму родительства. Социологические исследования, 7, 144—151. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250011071-1
Abdurakhmanova, E.M., Alexandrova, E.A., Zvyagintsev, R.S., Kersha, Yu.D. (2021). Distrust to vaссination through the prism of parenthood. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, 7, 144—151. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250011071-1 - Антонова, Н.А., Ерицян, К.Ю. (2018). Систематический обзор эмпирических исследований факторов отказа от вакцинации. Гигиена и санитария, 97(7), 664—670. http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2018-97-7-664-670
Antonova, N.A., Yeritsyan, K.Yu. (2018). The systematic review of empirical research of factors of refusal from vaccination. Gigiena i Sanitaria, 97(7), 664—670. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2018-97-7-664-670 - Вошева, Н.А., Камынина, Н.Н., Короткова, Е.О., Вошев, Д.В. (2021). Сравнительный анализ отношения населения к вакцинации от коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19 в зарубежных странах и в России. Проблемы социальной гигиены, здравоохранения и истории медицины, (29)2, 220—226.
Vosheva, N.A., Kamynina, N.N., Korotkova, E.O., Voshev, D.V. (2021). The comparative analysis of population attitude to vaccination against COVID-19 infection in foreign countries and in Russia. Problemi socialnoi gigieni, zdravookhranenia i istorii meditsini, (29)2, 220—226. (In Russ.). - Малыгин, В.Л., Малыгин, Я.В., Искандирова, А.С., Пахтусова, Е.Е., Меркурьева, Ю.А., Огарев, В.В., Худяков, А.В., Асасян, М.А. (2021). Многофакторная модель готовности к вакцинации студентов медицинских вузов в период третьей волны пандемии COVID-19. Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика, 13(6), 29—34. https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-6-29-34
Malygin, V.L., Malygin, Ya.V., Iskandirova, A.S., Pahtusova, E.E., Merkuryeva, Yu.A., Ogarev, V.V., Hudiakov, A.V., Asasian, M.A. (2021). Multifactorial model of willingness to get vaccinated in medical students during 3rd wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics, 13(6), 29—34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-6-29-34 - Марголис, А.А., Сорокова, М.Г., Шведовская, А.А., Радчикова, Н.П. (2022). Разработка и стандартизация опросника «Шкала отношения к вакцинации от COVID-19». Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 19(3), 454—474. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2022-3-454-474
Margolis, A.A., Sorokova, M.G., Shvedovskaya, A.A., Radchikova, N.P. (2022). The Questionnaire “COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Scale” (COVID-19 VAS): Development and Standardization. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 19(3), 454—474. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2022-3-454-474 - Угланова, И.Л., Михайлова, А.М., Бельская, Т.В., Гетман, А.В. (2021). Конспирологические представления о вакцинации: валидизация опросника. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Социология, 14(1), 14—32. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.102
Uglanova, I.L., Mikhaylova, A.M., Belskaya, T.V., Getman, A.V. (2021). Conspiracy beliefs about vaccination: Questionnaire validation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 14(1), 14—32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2021.102 - Benet-Martínez, V. (2007). Cross-cultural personality research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In: R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, & R.F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 170—189). The Guilford Press.
- Bruno, F., Laganà, V., Pistininzi, R., Tarantino, F., Martin, L., Servidio, R. (2022). Validation and psychometric properties of the Italian Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX-I) scale. Current psychology, 42, 21287—21297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03209-5
- Eisenblaetter, M., Madiouni, C., Laraki, Y., Capdevielle, D., Raffard, S. (2023). Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale. Vaccines, 11(5), 1001. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11051001
- Espejo, B., Checa, I., Martín-Carbonell, M. (2022). Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale (VAX) in a Spanish sample. BMC psychology, 10, 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00929-y
- Huza, G. (2020). The Psychometric Properties of a Romanian Version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale. International Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Education and Behavioural Science, 6(1), 25—31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhpebs.20200601.14
- Kim, J., Han, K., Chung, S.J., Kim, C. (2023). Psychometric validation of the Korean versions of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale and Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale. Vaccine, 41(1), 4685—4692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.046
- Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Martin, L.R., Petrie, K.J. (2017). Understanding the Dimensions of Anti-Vaccination Attitudes: the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale. Annals of behavioral medicine, 51, 652—660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9888-y
- Özpinar, S., Dunder, E., Çelik, O.N. (2020). The Vaccine Attitude Scale: Psychometric Properties and Validation. Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination, 11(5), 1—5. https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7560.20.11.426
- Paredes, B., Cárdaba, M.Á., Cuesta, U., Martinez, L. (2021). Validity of the Spanish Version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale. Vaccines, 9(11), 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111237
- Prislin, R., Dyer, J.A., Blakely, C.H., Johnson, C.D. (1998). Immunization status and sociodemographic characteristics: the mediating role of beliefs, attitudes, and perceived control. American journal of public health, 88(12), 1821—1826.https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.88.12.1821
- Shapiro, G.K., Holding, A., Perez, S., Amsel, R., Rosberger, Z. (2016). Validation of the vaccine conspiracy beliefs scale. Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2, 167—172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2016.09.001
- Smith, L.E., Amlôt, R., Weinman, J., Yiend, J., Rubin, G.J. (2017). A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children. Vaccine, 35(45), 6059—6069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.09.046
- Tsimtsiou, Z., Tsiligianni, I., Papaioannou, A., Gougourelas, D., Kolokas, K., Gkizlis, V., Chatzimanolis, E., Domeyer, P.-R.J. (2021). Understanding what people think and feel about adult vaccinations and the associated barriers in Greece: Development and validation of the attitude towards adult vaccination (ATAVAC) scale. Health & social care in the community, 29(3), 818—828. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13317
- West, L.M., Theuma, R.B., Cordina, M. (2020). The 'Necessity-Concerns Framework' as a means of understanding non-adherence by applying polynomial regression in three chronic conditions. Chronic illness, 16(4), 253—265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395318799847
- Wood, L., Smith, M., Miller, C.B., O'Carroll, R. (2019). The Internal Consistency and Validity of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination Scale: A Replication Study. Annals of behavioral medicine, 53(1), 109—114. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay043
- Yildiz, E., Güngörmüş, Z., Dayapoğlu, N. (2021). Assessment of Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 14(1), 261—268.
Information About the Authors
Contribution of the authors
Aleksiia Iu. Syromiatnikova — conceptualization; methodology; investigation; data curation; formal analysis; visualization; writing — original draft.
Larisa V. Mararitsa — conceptualization; methodology; investigation; writing — review & editing.
Elena D. Artemenko — conceptualization; methodology; writing — review & editing.
All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics statement
The experimental study design was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Research University Higher School of Economics (сommittee report 2023/01/09).
Metrics
Web Views
Whole time: 201
Previous month: 141
Current month: 20
PDF Downloads
Whole time: 27
Previous month: 19
Current month: 1
Total
Whole time: 228
Previous month: 160
Current month: 21