Skip to Main Content

Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology
2015. Vol. 4, no. 3, 36–46
doi:10.17759/jmfp.2015040305
ISSN: 2304-4977 (online)

Social networks user: current research

3919

E.R. Agadullina

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review current research studies focusing on the users of Facebook and their behaviors in social networks. This review is organized into two sections: 1) social-demographic characteristics (Age, Gender, Nationality); 2) personality characteristics (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness-to-Experience, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Narcissism, Self-esteem). The results showed that the information in the personal profile and online behavior are strongly connected with socio-demographic and personality characteristics

General Information

Keywords: social networks, Facebook, five-factor model of personality, narcissism, self-esteem

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2015040305

For citation: Agadullina E.R. Social networks user: current research [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2015. Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 36–46. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2015040305. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Amichai-Hamburger Y., Kaplan H., Dorpatcheon N. Click to the past: The impact of extroversion by users of nostalgic websites on the use of Internet social services. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1907–1912. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.005.
  2. Amichai-Hamburger Y., Vinitzky G. Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1289–1295. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.018.
  3. Barker V. Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: the influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 2009, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 209–213. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0228.
  4. Blomfield Neira C.J., Barber B.L. Social networking site use: Linked to adolescents’ social self-concept, self-esteem, and depressed mood. Australian Journal of Psychology 2014, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 56–64. doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12034.
  5. Bonetti L., Campbell M.A., Gilmore L. The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children’s and adolescents' online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 279–285. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0215.
  6. Boyd D.M., Ellison N.B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 210–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
  7. Buffardi L.E., Campbell W.K. Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1303–1314. doi: 10.1177/0146167208320061.
  8. Carpenter C.J. Narcissism on Facebook: Self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 2012, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 482–486. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.011.
  9. Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The Revised NEO Personality Inventory. McCrae R.R. [et al.]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1998, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 171–188.
  10. Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., Lampe C. The benefits of facebook «friends»: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.
  11. Exploring the Motivations of Facebook Use in Taiwan. Alhabash S. [et al.]. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2012, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 304–311. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0611.
  12. Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Roblyer M.D. [et al.]. Internet and Higher Education, 2010, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 134–140. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.03.002.
  13. Forest A.L., Wood J.V. When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on facebook. Psychological Science, 2012, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 295–302. doi: 10.1177/0956797611429709.
  14. Gentile B., Twenge J.M., Freeman E.C., Campbell W.K. The effect of social networking websites on positive self-views: An experimental investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1929–1933. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.012.
  15. Gonzales A.L., Hancock J.T. Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2011, vol. 14, no. 1-2, pp. 79–83. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0411.
  16. Große Deters F., Mehl M. R., Eid M. Narcissistic power poster? On the relationship between narcissism and status updating activity on Facebook. Journal of Research in Personality. 2014, vol. 53, pp. 165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.004.
  17. Hew K.F. Students’ and teachers' use of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 662–676. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.020.
  18. Junco R. The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers and Education, 2012, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004.
  19. Karl K., Peluchette J., Schlaegel C. Who’s posting facebook faux pas? a cross-cultural examination of personality differences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2010, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 174–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00499.x.
  20. Kluemper D.H., Rosen P.A., Mossholder K.W. Social Networking Websites, Personality Ratings, and the Organizational Context: More Than Meets the Eye? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1143–1172. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00881.x.
  21. Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, vol. 110, no. 15, pp. 5802–5805.
  22. Lampe C., Ellison N., Steinfield C. A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW ’06, 2006 , pp 167–170. doi: 10.1145/1180875.1180901.
  23. Manago A.M., Taylor T., Greenfield P.M. Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 2012, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 369–380. doi: 10.1037/a0026338.
  24. Manifestations of personality in online social networks: Self-reported facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Gosling S.D. [et al.]. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2011, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 483–488. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0087.
  25. McAndrew F.T., Jeong H.S. Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2359–2365. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.007.
  26. McCrae R.R., John O.P. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 1992, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 175–215.
  27. Mehdizadeh S. Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 357–364. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0257.
  28. Millennials, narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social networking sites and why. Bergman S.M. [et al.]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 706–711. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.022.
  29. Moore K., McElroy J.C. The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.009.
  30. Narcissism, extraversion and adolescents’ self-presentation on Facebook. Ong E.Y.L. [et al.]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.022.
  31. Nosko A., Wood E., Molema S. All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.012.
  32. Online and offline social ties of social network website users: An exploratory study in eleven societies / Cardon P.W. [et al.]. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 2009, vol. 50, 1, pp. 54–64.
  33. Pempek T., Yermolayeva Y., Calvert S. L. College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2009, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010.
  34. Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Ross C. [et al.]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009, vol. 25, no. 2. pp. 578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.024.
  35. Rainie L., Lenhart A., Smith A. The tone of life on social networking sites. Pew Research Center, 2012.
  36. Ryan T., Xenos S. Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1658–1664. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004.
  37. Seidman G. Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 2013, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009.
  38. Selfie posting behaviors are associated with narcissism among men. Sorokowski P. [et al.]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, vol. 85, pp. 123–127. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.004.
  39. Sheldon P. Student favorite: Facebook and motives for its use. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 2008, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 39-53.
  40. Skues J. L., Williams B., Wise L. The effects of personality traits, self-esteem, loneliness, and narcissism on Facebook use among university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 2414–2419. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.012.
  41. Social capital: the benefit of Facebook “friends”. Johnston K. [et al.]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2013, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 24-36. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.550063.
  42. Social media and mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Lenhart A. [et al.]. PEW Research Center. 2010, pp. 1–51. doi: 10.1021/ed8000717.
  43. Tazghini S., Siedlecki K. L. A mixed method approach to examining Facebook use and its relationship to self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 827–832. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.010.
  44. The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being / Schiffrin H. [et al.]. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2010, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 299–306. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0173.
  45. The Five-Factor Model of personality and Degree and Transitivity of Facebook social networks. Lönnqvist J.-E. [et al.]. Journal of Research in Personality, 2014, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 98–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.009.
  46. Toma C.L. Feeling Better But Doing Worse: Effects of Facebook Self-Presentation on Implicit Self-Esteem and Cognitive Task Performance. Media Psychology, 2013, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 199–220. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.762189.
  47. Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on facebook / Tong S.T. [et al.]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 531–549. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00409.x.
  48. Understanding online community citizenship behaviors through social support and social identity / Chiu C.-M. [et al.]. International Journal of Information Management, 2015, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 504–519. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.009.
  49. Valkenburg P.M., Peter J., Schouten A.P. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2006, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 584–590. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584.
  50. Valkenburg P.M., Schouten A.P., Peter J. Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media and Society, 2005, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 383–402. doi: 10.1177/1461444805052282.
  51. Vasalou A., Joinson A. N., Courvoisier D. Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of “true commitment” in Facebook. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 2010, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.06.002.
  52. Wang S.S., Stefanone M.A. Showing Off? Human Mobility and the Interplay of Traits, Self-Disclosure, and Facebook Check-Ins. Social Science Computer Review, 2013, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 437–457. doi: 10.1177/0894439313481424.
  53. Wang Y.-C., Burke M., Kraut R. Gender, topic, and audience response: An analysis of user-generated content on Facebook. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Proceedings, 2013, pp. 31–34. doi: 10.1145/2470654.2470659.
  54. What does the Narcissistic personality inventory really measure? Ackerman R.A. [et al.]. Assessment, 2011, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 67–87. doi: 10.1177/1073191110382845.
  55. When social media isn’t social: Friends' responsiveness to narcissists on Facebook. Choi M. [et al.]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2015, vol. 77, pp. 209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.056.
  56. Wilson R.E., Gosling S.D., Graham L.T. A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2012, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 203–220. doi: 10.1177/1745691612442904.

Information About the Authors

Elena R. Agadullina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1505-1412, e-mail: eagadullina@hse.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 5032
Previous month: 12
Current month: 32

Downloads

Total: 3919
Previous month: 21
Current month: 18