Musically developed personality: the approbation of Gold-MSI method

988

Abstract

The article provides an overview of modern foreign psychological research devoted to the study of musicality. It describes in details Gold-MSI method (Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index), developed by psychologists at the University of Goldsmith to diagnose the level of musical development. In Russia, this technique is unknown, although it is widely used in foreign studies, it is standardized and has displayed good psychometric properties. The article presents the results of the initial testing of the Russian version of the Gold-MSI technique on a sample of 107 participants. It is shown that the Russian version of the methodology has a satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used for research purposes

General Information

Keywords: musicality, musical abilities, diagnosis, approaches to measuring musicality, Gold-MSI technique, testing the Russian version of the Gold-MSI, psychometric properties

Journal rubric: Labour Psychology and Engineering Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2018070208

For citation: Knyazeva T.S., Shokhman T.V. Musically developed personality: the approbation of Gold-MSI method [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 2018. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 80–89. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2018070208. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bigand E., Poulin-Charronnat B. Are we «experienced listeners»? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 2006, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 100–130. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.007
  2. Brown R.M., Zatorre R.J., Penhune V.B. Expert music performance: cognitive, neural, and developmental bases. Progress in brain research, 2015, vol. 217, pp. 57–86. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.021
  3. Carson A.D. Why has musical aptitude assessment fallen flat? And what can we do about it? Journal of Career Assessment, 1998, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311–327. doi:10.1177/106907279800600303
  4. Degrave P., Dedonder J. Validation of a French translation of the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index, an instrument to assess self-reported musical skills and behaviors [Elektronnyi resurs]. ESCOM, 2017. Available at: http://www.escom2017.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DEGRAVE-DEDONDER_poster.pdf (Accessed 13.05.2018).
  5. Ericsson K.A., Smith J. Toward a general theory of exercise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge – England: Cambridge University Press, 1991. 347 р.
  6. Fiedler D., Müllensiefen D. Validation of the Gold-MSI questionnaire to measure musical sophistication of German students at secondary education schools. Musikpädagogische Forschung [Elektronnyi resurs] // Research in Music Education. 2015. Vol. 36. P. 199–219. Available at: http://www.doc.gold.ac.uk/~mas03dm/papers/Fiedler_Mullensiefen_2015.pdf (Accessed 13.05.2018).
  7. Gaser C., Schlaug G. Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 2003, vol. 23, no. 27, pp. 9240–9245. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09240.2003
  8. Carey D. et al. Generality and specificity in the effects of musical expertise on perception and cognition. Cognition, 2015, vol. 137, pp. 81–105. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.005
  9. Glaser R. Expertise. In Eysenck M.W. (eds.) [et al.] The Blackwell Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1994, pp. 139–142.
  10. Müllensiefen D. et al. Goldsmiths musical sophistication index (gold-MSI) v1. [Elektronnyi resurs]. The Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI): Technical Report and Documentation v 1.0, 2013. Available at: https://www.gold.ac.uk/media/documents-by-section/departments/psychology/Gold-MSIv10_Documentation.pdf (Accessed 13.05.2018).
  11. Hallam S., Prince V. Conceptions of musical ability. Research Studies in Music Education, 2003, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 2–22. doi:10.1177/1321103X030200010101
  12. Hallam S. 21st century conceptions of musical ability. Psychology of Music, 2010, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 308–330. doi:10.1177/0305735609351922
  13. Hansen N.C., Vuust P., Pearce M.T. “If you have to ask, you’ll never know”: Effects of specialised stylistic expertise on predictive processing of music. PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163584
  14. Levitin D.J. What does it mean to be musical? Neuron, 2012, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 633–637. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.017
  15. Chin T.C. et al. MUSEBAQ: A Modular Tool for Music Research to Assess Musicianship, Musical Capacity, Music Preferences, and Motivations for Music Use. Music Perception. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2018, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 376–399. doi:10.1525/mp.2018.35.3.376
  16. Ollen J.E. A criterion-related validity test of selected indicators of musical sophistication using expert ratings [Elektronnyi resurs]. Doctoral thesis, Ohio State University: Ohio, 2006. 246 p. Available at: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1161705351&disposition=inline (Accessed 15.05.2018).
  17. Greenberg D.M. et. al. Personality predicts musical sophistication. Journal of Research in Personality, 2015, vol. 58, pp. 154–158. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2015.06.002
  18. Persson R.S. The elusive muse: Understanding musical giftedness. In: Shavinina L.V. (ed.). International handbook on giftedness. Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, pp. 727–749.
  19. Ullén F. et al. Psychometric properties and heritability of a new online test for musicality, the Swedish Musical Discrimination Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 2014, vol. 63, pp. 87–93. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.057
  20. Schaal N.K., Bauer A.K.R., Müllensiefen D. Der Gold-MSI: replikation und validierung eines fragebogeninstrumentes zur messung musikalischer erfahrenheit anhand einer deutschen stichprobe. Musicae Scientiae, 2014, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 423-447. doi:10.1177/1029864914541851
  21. Seashore C.E. The Measurement of Musical Talent [Электронный ресурс]. The Musical Quarterly, 1915, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 129–148. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/738047?seq=2#page_scan_tab_contents (Accessed 13.05.2018).
  22. Seashore C.E., Lewis D., Saetveit J.G. Seashore measures of musical talents. Oxford, England: Psychological Corp., 1956.
  23. Simonton D.K. Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological review, 1999, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 435–457. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.435
  24. Sloboda J. Science and music: the ear of the beholder. Nature, 2008, vol. 454, no. 7200, pp. 32–33. doi:10.1038/454032a
  25. Wallentin M. et al. The Musical Ear Test, a new reliable test for measuring musical competence. Learning and Individual Differences, 2010, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 188–196. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.004
  26. Müllensiefen D. et al. The Musicality of Non-Musicians: An Index for Assessing Musical Sophistication in the General Population. PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9, no. 2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089642
  27. Ullen F., Hambrick D.Z., Mosing M.A. Rethinking expertise: A multifactorial gene–environment interaction model of expert performance. Psychological bulletin, 2016, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 427–446. doi:10.1037/bul0000033
  28. Slater J. et al. Variations on the theme of musical expertise: cognitive and sensory processing in percussionists, vocalists and non‐musicians. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2017, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 952–963. doi:10.1111/ejn.13535

Information About the Authors

T. S. Knyazeva, PhD in Psychology, Senior researcher, The laboratory of psychology and psychophysiology of creative activity, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: tknyazeva@inbox.ru

Tatyana V. Shokhman, Graduate Student, Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: tshohman@ya.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1698
Previous month: 11
Current month: 8

Downloads

Total: 988
Previous month: 1
Current month: 4