Work-life balance: foreign models for studying multi-purpose activity

 
Audio is AI-generated
1

Abstract

Context and Relevance. The psychological well-being of a contemporary individual largely depends on the harmonious integration of various life domains. The proliferation of information and communication technologies, intensification of labor, and the introduction of flexible and remote work arrangements contribute to heightened tension and stress, as well as the blurring of boundaries between work and other life domains. These developments underscore the need for research into the complex interrelationships between work and non-work life, life domain balance, and strategies for sustaining it. Objective. To provide an analytical review of the international theoretical framework that enables reconceptualization of the traditional work–family interface and inter-role interaction models as a foundation for psychological research on the specifics of individual regulation of work–life balance within the digital environment. Results. The article examines: work–family interface models, including inter-role conflict and enrichment; demands and resources models describing the spillover of demands and resources between work and family domains; boundary theories pertaining to work and non-work domains; the concept of work–life balance; and models of information technology use that elucidate the specifics of boundaries and life domain balance in the digital environment. Conclusion. The reviewed theories and models facilitate a shift from inter-role interaction toward the study of multi-goal activity, which places the individual at the center—alongside their goals, priorities, and psychological experience of harmonizing all life domains.

 

General Information

Keywords: psychological well-being, work-life balance, work-family interface, inter-role interaction, resources, boundaries

Journal rubric: Social Psychology

Article type: review article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2026150116

Received 19.10.2024

Revised 19.05.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Loginov, N.I., Gladkaya, E.V. (2026). Work-life balance: foreign models for studying multi-purpose activity. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 15(1), 174–182. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2026150116

© Loginov N.I., Gladkaya E.V., 2026

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Allen, T.D., Cho, E., Meier, L.L. (2014). Work-family boundary dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 99—121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091330
  2. Allen, T.D., Herst, D.E.L., Bruck, C.S., Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(2), 278—308. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.278
  3. Ashforth, B., Kreiner, G., Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472—491. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3363315
  4. Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., Sanz-Verge, A. (2023). Job demands-resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25—53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
  5. Bobbio, A., Canova, L., Manganelli, A.M. (2022). Organizational work-home culture and its relations with the work—family interface and employees’ subjective well-being. Applied Research Quality Life, 17, 2933—2966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10048-w
  6. Brough, P., Timms, C., Chan, X.W., Hawkes, A., Rasmussen, L. (2020). Work-life balance: Definitions, causes, and consequences. In: T. Theorell (Ed.), Handbook of Socioeconomic Determinants of Occupational Health: From Macro-level to Micro-level Evidence (pp. 473—487). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31438-5_20
  7. Ten Brummelhuis, L.L., Bakker, A.B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work-home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545—556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974
  8. Carlson, D.S., Grzywacz, J.G., Zivnuska, S. (2009). Is work-family balance more than conflict and enrichment? Human relations, 62(10), Article 1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709336500
  9. Casper, W.J., Vaziri, H., Wayne, J.H., DeHauw, S., Greenhaus, J. (2018). The jingle-jangle of work-nonwork balance: A comprehensive and meta-analytic review of its meaning and measurement. Journal of applied psychology, 103(2), 182—214. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000259
  10. Choo, C.E.K., Kan, Z.X., Cho, E. (2021). A review of the literature on the school-work-life interface. Journal of Career Development, 48(3), 290—305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319841170
  11. Clark, S.C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747—770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001
  12. Cobb, H.R., Murphy, L.D., Thomas, C.L., Katz, I.M., Rudolph, C.W. (2022). Measuring boundaries and borders: A taxonomy of work-nonwork boundary management scales. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 137, Article 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103760
  13. Creed, P.A., French, J., Hood, M. (2015). Working while studying at university: The relationship between work benefits and demands and engagement and well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 48—57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.002
  14. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A.B. (2023). Job demands-resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(3), 209—236. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022
  15. Greenhaus, J.H., Powell, G.N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72—92. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379625
  16. Kerksieck, P., Kujanpää, M., de Bloom, J., Brauchli, R., Bauer, G.F. (2024). A new perspective on balancing life domains: Work-nonwork balance crafting. BMC Public Health, 24, Article 1099. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18646-z
  17. Kossek, E.E. (2016). Managing work-life boundaries in the digital age. Organizational Dynamics, 45(3), 258—270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.07.010
  18. Kühner, C., Rudolph, C.W., Derks, D., Posch, M., Zacher, H. (2023). Technology-assisted supplemental work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 142, Article 103861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103861
  19. Lazzaro-Salazar, M., Barros, S. (2024). Work-family interface during COVID-19: A sociolinguistic study of working mums’ identity and mental health. BMC Psychology, 12, Article 423. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01923-2
  20. Limatujuh, E., Perdhana, M.S. (2023). Worklife balance: Social dynamics of work life. Return: Study of Management, Economic and Business, 2(6), 559—567. https://doi.org/10.57096/return.v2i06.107
  21. Liu, M.S., Wang, M.L., Lee, C.H. (2022). Exploring the linkages between job demands and recovery self-efficacy: A resource perspective of the school—work interface. Personnel Review, 51(3), 1187—1204. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2020-0547
  22. Marôco, A.L., Nogueira, F., Gonçalves, S.P., Marques, I.C.P. (2022). Work-family interface in the context of social. responsibility: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(5), Article 3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053091
  23. Marsh, E., Vallejos, E.P., Spence, A. (2022). The digital workplace and its dark side: An integrative review. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, Article 107118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107118
  24. Mude, M., Wesley, J.R. (2024). Bibliometric analysis on positive work—family interface. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 44(5—6), 537—554. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2023-0300
  25. Nilsen, W., Nordberg, T., Drange, I., Junker, N.M., Aksnes, S.Y., Cooklin, A., Cho, E., Habib, L.M.A., Hokke, S., Olson-Buchanan, J.B., Bernstrom, V.H. (2024). Boundary-crossing ICT use — A scoping review of the current literature and a road map for future research. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, Article 100444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100444
  26. Sabuero, J.B. (2024). The work-life balance among private secondary school teachers. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(7), 2611—2619. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.07.19
  27. Savard, Y.P. (2023). Work-family spillover of daily positive affect onto performance: The moderating role of domain identity salience. European Review of Applied Psychology, 73(2), Article 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2022.100819
  28. Soundarya Priya, M.G., Anandh, K.S., Prasanna, K., Gunasekaran, K., Daniel, E.I., Szóstak, M., Sunny, D. (2023). Exploring the factors that influence the work-family interface of construction professionals: An Indian case study. Buildings, 13(6), Article 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061511
  29. Thilagavathy, S., Geetha, S.N. (2021). Work-life balance — a systematic review. Vilakshan — XIMB Journal of Management, 20(2), 258—276. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-10-2020-0186
  30. Wang, Y. (2024). Work-family conflict and balance strategies — an analysis based on the work-family resources model. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(2), 1228—1239. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.122064
  31. Wöhrmann, A.M., Dilchert, N., Michel, A. (2021). Working time flexibility and work-life balance. Zeitschrift fur Arbeitswissenschaft, 75, 74—85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-020-00230-x
  32. Yeh, Y.J.Y., Ma, T.N., Pan, S.Y., Chuang, P.J., Jhuang, Y.H. (2019). Assessing potential effects of daily cross-domain usage of information and communication technologies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160(4), 465—478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1680943

Information About the Authors

Nikita I. Loginov, Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology, Research Fellow, Laboratory for cognitive research, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Taganrog, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1911-8434, e-mail: nlyz@sfedu.ru

Elena V. Gladkaya, Postgraduate student, Southern Federal University, Taganrog, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4956-4905, e-mail: egladkaia@sfedu.ru

Contribution of the authors

Natalya A. Lyz — ideas; literature review; annotation, writing of the manuscript.
Elena V. Gladkaya — literature review; writing and design of the manuscript.
All authors participated in the discussion of the results and approved the final text of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 2
Previous month: 0
Current month: 2

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 1
Previous month: 0
Current month: 1

 Total

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3