Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought)

347

Abstract

The paper presents outcomes of an empirical study aimed at identifying the determinants that influence the preservation of the research agenda in a sci entific school by its followers.The study was carried out on the material of U.V.Ulyenkova’s school of thought that has established a unique approach to the diagnostics and treatment of children with delayed mental development.Our hypothesis was that the disciples of this scientific school that carry out their activities within the research agenda and research focus of the school’s founder have high levels of research achievements.In the course of the study we identified and followed a network of 42 disciples of Ulyenkova’s school of thought and evaluated their research activities, including the indices of their publishing activities in the Russian Science Citation Index.As it was revealed, the preservation of the ‘research programme’ of the academic supervisor is not common for this network of disciples, and their focus on studying children with delayed mental development is closely connected with citing U.V.Ulyenkova’s works and works of other members of the network.We emphasise that the key role is that of the social capital of the postgraduate network: co-authoring, readiness to read and cite works of other followers positively correlates with all the main indices of academic achievements of the explored network.

General Information

Keywords: postgraduate school, scientific school, research metrics

Journal rubric: Scientific Schools

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2018230512

Funding. This work is part of the research #17-01-0041 "Ups and Downs of Regional Schools of Thought" carried out within thе HSE Acedemic Fund Programme in 2017-2018 and within the Project 5-100 (state support programme for top Russian universities).

For citation: Radina N.K. Limits of Reproducing Scientific Traditions in Regional Schools of Thought (On the Material of U.V. Ulyenkova’s School of Thought). Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2018. Vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 124–132. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2018230512. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Arpentyeva M.R.Osobennosti nauchnogo tvorchestva v kontekste razvitiya nauchnykh shkol [Features of scientific creativity in the context of the development of scientific schools].Gumanitarnye vedomosti TGPU im. L.N. Tolstogo [Humanitarian reports of TSPU. L.N. Tolstoy], 2015, no.3, pp.25—34.
  2. Aspirantskiye shkoly NIU VSE [Postgraduate Schools of the Higher School of Economics] [Elektronnyi resurs].Available at: https://aspirantura.hse.ru/asp_ school (Accessed: 08.09.17).
  3. Bedny B.I., Kazantsev V.B., Chuprunov Ye.V.Podgotovka nauchno-pedagogicheskikh kadrov v aspiranture: issledovatelskiye shkoly [Preparation of scientific and pedagogical staff in postgraduate study: research schools].Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2014, no.6, pp. 34—42.
  4. Vasilyev A., Markov V.Kollektivnaya nauchnaya deyatelnost v Rossii: sravneniye effektivnosti otechestvennoy i zarubezhnoy form organizatsii [Collective scientific activity in Russia: comparison of efficiency of domestic and foreign forms of organization].Vlast [Power], 2013, no.1, pp.48—53.
  5. Volodarskaya Ye.A.Naukovedchesky analiz nauchnoy shkoly O.K.Tikhomirova [Науковедческий анализ научной школы О.К.Тихомирова].Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii [Methodology and history of psychology], 2009, no.4 (4), pp.28—44.
  6. Kozlova L.A.«Nauchnaya shkola» v nauchnoy politike i sotsialnom issledovanii [«Scientific School» in Science Policy and Social Research].Vestnik instituta sotsiologii [Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology], 2014.no.3(10), pp.46—65.
  7. Kondratyev M.Yu.Sotsialnaya psikhologiya zakrytykh obrazovatelnykh uchrezhdeny [Social psychology of closed educational institutions].Saint- Petersburg: Piter, 2005.304 p.
  8. Subetto A.I.Noosfernaya nauchnaya shkola v Rossii: itogi i perspektivy [Noospheric Scientific School in Russia: Results and Prospects].Saint-Petersburg: Asterion, 2012.75 p.
  9. Shestak V.P., Shestak N.V.Aspirantura kak trety uroven vysshego obrazovaniya: diskursivnoye pole [Postgraduate studies as a third level of higher education: a discursive field].Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2015, no.12, pp. 22—34.
  10. Shutova N.V., Kisova V.V.Stanovleniye i puti razvitiya psikhologicheskogo obrazovaniya v Gorkovskom gosudarstvennom pedagogicheskom institute v 20—80 gody XX veka [Formation and development of psychological education in the Gorky State Pedagogical Institute in the 20—80s of the XX century].Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Minin’s University], 2016, no.2, pp.16.
  11. Yaroshevsky M.G.Logika razvitiya nauki i nauchnaya shkola [The logic of the development of science and the scientific school].In Mikulinsky M.G.(eds.), Shkoly v nauke [Schools in Science].Moscow: Nauka, 1977, pp.7—97.

Information About the Authors

Nadezhda K. Radina, Doctor of Political Science, Professor, PhD in Psychology, Professor of the Department of General and Social Psychology, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod — National Research University, Senior Research Fellow, Laboratory of Theory and Practice of Decision Support Systems (TAPRADESS), National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-1044, e-mail: rasv@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1271
Previous month: 23
Current month: 6

Downloads

Total: 347
Previous month: 1
Current month: 5