Introduction to Natural Sciences: The Human Cultural History Perspective

We construct an introductory Natural Sciences curriculum that meets the demands of the «cultural-historical school». Our main task was to find the conditions that contribute to the formation of model mediation of text understanding within the Natural Sciences course, the content of which represents a purposeful transformation of natural materials in accordance with the cultural-historical specifics of human activity. To explore how schoolchildren acquire orienting functions of learning texts and models supporting the logical-genetic reconstruction of the natural scientific knowledge, we conducted an experimental teaching course in Natural Sciences for 2nd-graders (21 students, 102 academic hours). Our lessons proved a principal possibility of unfolding subject and model components of the course through the organization of joint actions consistent with the tasks of learning activity development in primary school children. Also, we assessed model-building skills in text understanding and task solving in children of two schools: the first group (103 students, 68 academic hours) studied the course we had developed, and the second group (80 students, 68 academic hours) received standard school courses. A significant improvement of model-building in the experimental group as compared to the control group suggests that cultural-activity-based introduction to Natural Sciences may have a certain potential in promoting the acquisition of orienting functions of learning models, which is vital for future advancement in middle and high school.

1. Arsen`ev A.S. at al. Filosofsko-psixologicheskie problemy` razvitiya obrazovaniya [Philosophical and psychological problems of education development]. Davydov V.V. (ed.). Moscow: Pedagogika, 1981, 176 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bzhexva Yan. Dyrki v syre [Holes in the cheese]. Vsyo dlya vsex: stixi pol`skix poe`tov [Everything for everyone: poems of Polish poets]. Moscow: Children’s literature, 1972, pp. 145—147. (In Russ.).
3. Voprosy` psixologii uchebnoj deyatel`nosti mladshix shkol`nikov [Psychological questions of of educational activity of elementary school student]. Elkonin D.B., Davydov V.V. (ed.). Moscow: Academy of Education of the RSFSR Press, 1962, 287 p. (In Russ.).
4. Voronczov A.B., Vysoczkaya E.V. at al. Prirodovedenie. 5 klass [Science Education. 5th grade]. Koncepciya razvivayushhego obucheniya v osnovnoj shkole. Uchebny`e programmy` (sistema D.B. Elkonina—V.V. Davydova) [The developmental Instruction Framework at secondary school. Syllabi (Elkonin—Davydov’s system)]. A.B. Voronczov (Ed.). Moscow: Vita-press, 2009, pp. 294—302. (In Russ.).
5. Vygotskij L.S. Pedagogicheskaya psixologiya [Educational psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press, 1996, 536 p. (In Russ.).
6. Vysotskaya E.V. at al. Kurs «Prirodovedenie» v sisteme D.B. Elkonina — V.V. Davydova: chto mozhno vy`rastit` na «nich`ej zemle» [“Science” course in Elkonin—Davydov’s system: what can be grown on “no-one’s land”]. Deyatel`nostny`j podxod v obrazovanii: monografiya. Kniga 1 [ The Activity approach in education: Book 1.]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2018, pp. 266—275. (In Russ.).
7. Vysotskaya E.V. at al. Obnovlenie soderzhaniya osnovnogo obshhego obrazovaniya: Prirodovedenie [Rethinking the content of general education at secondary school: Science Education]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2017, 140 p. (In Russ.).
8. Vysotskaya E.V. at al. Prirodovedenie. 5 klass: uchebnoe posobie [Science. Grade 5: textbook]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2016, 113 p. (In Russ.).
9. Vysotskaya E.V. at al. Propedevticheskij predmet” Prirodovedenie” v estestvoznanii osnovnoj shkoly` [Introductory subject “Science” in the science at secondary school]. Obnovlenie soderzhaniya osnovnogo obshhego obrazovaniya: Teoriya i praktika [Rethinking the content of general education at secondary school: Science Education: Theory and practice]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2018, pp. 28—48. (In Russ.).
10. Vysotskaya E.V., Ulanovskaya I.M., Yanishevskaya M.A. Formirovanie metapredmetny`x obrazovatel`ny`x rezul`tatov: vozrastnaya dinamika [Development of metacognitive educational results]. Materialy` Tret`ei Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Lichnost`, intellekt, metakognicii: issledovatel`skie podxody` i obrazovatel`ny`e praktiki” (g. Kaluga, 19—21 aprelia 2018 g). [Proceedings of the Third International research practice conference “Personality, intelligence, metacognition: research approaches and educational practices”]. Kaluga: IP Yakunin A.V., 2018, pp. 301—308. (In Russ.).
11. Galperin P.Ya. Metody obucheniya i umstvennoe razvitie rebenka [Methods of teaching and the child cognitive development]. Moscow: MGU Press, 1985, 45 p. (In Russ.).
12. Galperin P.Ya. Razumnost` dejstvij i predmet nauki [Rational actions and the subject of science]. Psixologiya kak ob`ektivnaya nauka: izbranny`e psixologicheskie trudy` [Psychology as an objective science: selected psychological works]. Moscow: Moscow Psychological and Social Institute Press; Voronezh: Modek Press, 2008, pp. 317—331. (In Russ.).
13. Davydov V.V. Teoriya razvivayushhego obucheniya [Theory of Developmental Education]. Moscow: INTOR, 1996, 544 p. (In Russ.).
14. Davydov V.V. Chto takoe uchebnoe deyatel`nost`? [What is learning activity?]. O ponyatii razvivayushhego obucheniya [About the concept of developmental instruction]. Tomsk: PELENG, 1995, 142 p. (In Russ.).
15. Davydov V.V., Elkonin D.B. Vozrastny`e vozmozhnosti usvoeniya znanij [Age-related learning opportunities]. Moscow: Prosveshenie, 1966, 443 p. (In Russ.).
16. Deyatel`nostny`j podxod v obrazovanii: monografiya. Kniga 1 [The Activity approach in education: Book 1]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2018, 360 p. (In Russ.).
17. Deyatel`nostny`j podxod v obrazovanii: monografiya. Kniga 2 [The Activity approach in education: Book 2]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2019. 304 p. (In Russ.).
18. Koncepciya razvivayushhego obucheniya v osnovnoj shkole. Uchebny`e programmy` (sistema D.B. Elkonina—V.V. Davydova) [The Developmental Instruction Framework at secondary school. Syllabi (Elkonin—Davydov’s system)]. Voronczov A.B. (ed.). Moscow: Author’s club, 2009. 448 p. (In Russ.).
19. Leontev A.N. Ovladenie uchashhimisya nauchny`mi ponyatiyami kak problema pedagogicheskoj psixologii [Acquisition scientific concepts by students as a problem of educational psychology]. psixologicheskie proizvedeniya [Selected. psychological works]. Moscow: Pedagogy, 1983, Vol.1, pp. 324—347. (In Russ.).
20. Vysotskaya E.V. at al. Prirodovedenie, ili o chyom rasskazhut estestvenny`e nauki. Kniga 2. S``edobnoe-nes``edobnoe [Science: what the natural Sciences will tell you. Book 2. Edible-inedible]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2019, 64 p. (In Russ.).
21. Repkin V.V., Repkina N.V. Chto takoe razvivayushhee obuchenie [What is the developmental instruction]. Moscow: Author’s club, 2015, 152 p. (In Russ.).
22. Rubczov V.V. Kul`turno-istoricheskaya shkola (nauchnaya koncepciya) [Cultural-Historical school (scientific conception)]. Social`no-geneticheskaya psixologiya razvivayushhego obrazovaniya: deyatel`nostny`j podxod [ Socio-genetic psychology of developmental education: the activity approach]. Moscow: MGPPU, 2008, pp. 210—231. (In Russ.).
23. Rubczov V.V. Social`no-geneticheskaya psixologiya razvivayushhego obrazovaniya: deyatel`nostny`j podxod [Socio-genetic psychology of development education: the activity approach]. Moscow: MGPPU, 2008, 416 p. (In Russ.).
24. Sbornik programm dlya nachal`noj obshheobrazovatel`noj shkoly` (sistema D.B. E`l`konina—V.V. Davy`dova) [Sillabi for elementary schools (Elkonin—Davydov’s system)]. Voxmyanina L.A. (ed.). Moscow: Vita-press, 2001, 288 p. (In Russ.).
25. Zuckerman G.A., Venger A.L. Razvitie uchebnoj samostoyatel`nosti [Development of learning self-independence]. Moscow: OIRO, 2010, 432 p. (In Russ.).
26. Aalsvoort J.V. Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education. 2004. Vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 1635— 1651. DOI:10.1080/0950069042000205378
27. Armbruster B.B. Schema theory and the design of content-area textbooks. Educational Psychologist, 1986, Vol. 21 (4), pp. 253—267. DOI:10.1207/ s15326985ep2104_2
28. Broughton S.H., Sinatra G.M., & Reynolds R.E. The nature of the refutation text effect: An investigation of attention allocation. The Journal of Educational Research, 2010. Vol. 103 (6), pp. 407—423. DOI:10.1080/00220670903383101
29. Eriksson I. Materializing the youngest students’ algebraic arguments in classroom discussion: a learning activity perspective. Nordic-ISCAR, Trondheim, Norge 18—20 June, 2019.
30. Foregrounding Davydov’s curriculum: relational approach and algebraic thinking in early grades. Colloquium, Elena Polotskaia (organizer), Cristina Sabena (discussant). Proceedings of PME 42, 2018. 1, pp. 245—246.
31. Howe A.C. Development of science concepts within a Vygotskian framework. Science Education, Vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 35—51. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1098- 237X(199601)80:1<35::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-3
32. Hynd C., Alvermann, D.E. The role of refutation text in overcoming difficulty with science concepts. Journal of Reading, 1986. Vol. 29 (5), pp. 440—446.
33. Lemos M.F., Engeström Y. Collective concept formation in educational management: An intervention study in São Paulo, Brazil. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 2018. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32—56. DOI:10.12697/eha.2018.6.1.02b
34. Mason L., Gava M., Boldrin A. On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2008. Vol. 100 (2), pp. 291. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
35. McNamara D.S., Kintsch E., Songer N.B., Kintsch, W. Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and instruction, 1996, Vol. 14 (1), pp. 1—43. DOI:10.1207/ s1532690xci1401_1
36. Mellone M., Ramploud A., Di Paola B., Martignone, F. Cultural transposition: Italian didactic experiences inspired by Chinese and Russian perspectives on whole number arithmetic. ZDM, 2019. Vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 199— 212. DOI:10.1007/s11858-018-0992-7
37. Polotskaia E. How the Relational Paradigm Can Transform the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Experiment in Quebec. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning, 2017. Vol. 18, no. 2, рр. 161—180
38. Prins G.T., Bulte A.M., Van Driel J.H., & Pilot A. Students’ involvement in authentic modelling practices as contexts in chemistry education. Research in Science Education, 2009. Vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 681—700. DOI:10.1007/s11165-008-9099-4
39. Schmittau J. The role of theoretical analysis in developing algebraic thinking: A Vygotskian perspective. Early algebraization. — Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 71—85. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_5
40. Sidneva A. et al. Cultural-Activity Approach and transformation of school curriculum: advances and perspectives. XVI European Congress of Psycholog, Pp. 327—328.
41. Smith C., & Unger C. What’s in dots-per-box? Conceptual bootstrapping with stripped-down visual analogs. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1997, Vol. 6 (2), pp. 143—181. DOI:10.1207/s15327809jls0602_1
42. Tolmie A. et al. Task design as an influence on dialogue and learning: Primary school group work with object flotation. Social Development, 1993. Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 183—201. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993. tb00013.x
43. Tortora R., Mellone M.A. Design study for an Italian fifth grade class following Davydov traces. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 2017. Vol. 18, no. 2.1, рр. 240—256.