Psychological-Educational Studies
2018. Vol. 10, no. 3, 20–36
doi:10.17759/psyedu.2018100303
ISSN: 2587-6139 (online)
Social Interactions of Gifted Children in Heterogeneous Environment
Abstract
General Information
Keywords: heterogeneous environment, popularity, rejection, social correspondence, social effectiveness, social interaction, social status
Journal rubric: Methodology and Technology of Education
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2018100303
For citation: Donii E.I. Social Interactions of Gifted Children in Heterogeneous Environment [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psychological-Educational Studies, 2018. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 20–36. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2018100303. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
- Adams-Byers J., Whitsell S.S., Moon S.M. Gifted students' perceptions of the academic and social/emotional effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2004. Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 7—20. doi:10.1177/001698620404800102.
- Asher S.R., McDonald K.L.The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Rubin K.H., Bukowski M.W., Laursen B. (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: The Guilford Press, 2009, pp. 232—242. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kristina_McDonald/publication/232523645_The_behavioral_basis_of_acceptance_rejection_and_perceived_popularity/links/0a85e534fdff69e6b0000000.pdf (Accessed 02.07.2018).
- Bain S.K., Bell S.M. Social self-concept, social attributions, and peer relationships in fourth, fifth, and sixth graders who are gifted compared to high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2004. Vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 167—178. doi:10.1177/001698620404800302
- Cadenas M., Borges A. The assessment of change in social interaction through observation. AcciónPsicológica, 2017. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 121—136. doi:10.5944/ap.14.1.16224
- Cillessen A.H.N. Sociometric methods. In Rubin K.H., Bukowski M.W., Laursen B. (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: The Guilford Press, 2009, pp. 82—100.
- Coleman L.G. The power of specialized educational environments in the development of giftedness: the need for research on social context [Elektronnyi resurs]. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2014. Vol.37, no. 1, pp. 70—80. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001698629503900307 (Accessed 02.07.2018).
- Davis G.A, RimmS.B, SiegleD. Education of the gifted and talented. Essex (UK): Pearson, 2014. 576 p.
- Eide H., Quera V., Finset A. Exploring rare patient behavior with sequential analysis: an illustration. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 2003. Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 109—114. doi:10.1017/S1121189X00006175
- Fabes R.A., Martin C.L., Hanish L.D. Children’s behaviors and interactions with peers. In Rubin K.H., Bukowski M.W., Laursen B. (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: The Guilford Press, 2009, pp. 45—62.
- Hartup W.W. Critical issues and theoretical viewpoints. In Rubin K.H., Bukowski M.W., Laursen B. (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: The Guilford Press, 2009, pp. 3—20.
- Ladd G.W. Trends, travails, and turning points in early research on children’s peer relationships: legacies and lessons for our time? In Rubin K.H., Bukowski M.W., Laursen B. (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: The Guilford Press, 2009, pp. 20—45.
- Lee S-Y., Olszewski-KubiliusP., Thomson D.T. Academically gifted students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2012, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 90—104. doi:10.1177/0016986212442568
- Gabín B. et al. Lince: multiplatform sport analysis software. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol. 46, pp. 4692—4694. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.320
- Lubinski D. From Terman to Today: A Century of Findings on Intellectual Precocity. Review of Educational Research, 2016, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 900—944. doi:10.3102/0034654316675476
- Neihart M. Achievement/affiliation conflicts in gifted adolescents. RoeperReview, 2006, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 196—202. doi:10.1080/02783190609554364
- Newcomb A.F., Bukowski M., Pattee L. Children’s peer relations: A metaanalytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 1993, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 99—128.
- Robinson N.M. The social world of gifted children and youth [Elektronnyi resurs]. In Pfeiffer S.I. (eds.) Handbook of giftedness inchildren: psycho-educational theory, research, and best practices. NY: Springer, 2008. P. 33—51. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-0-387-74401-8.pdf (Accessed 02.07.2018).
- Rodríguez A., Morera D. La representación sociométrica individual. In Rodriguez A., Morera D. (eds.) El sociograma. Estudio de las relaciones informales en las organizaciones. Madrid: Pirámide, 2001. 178 p.
- Rodríguez Naveiras E. Un instrumento para la evaluación de proceso de un programa de altas capacidades. Tesis Doctoral. La Laguna, 2011. 439 p.
- Rose-Krasnor L., Denham S. Social-emotional competence in early childhood. In Rubin K.H., Bukowski W.M., Laursen B. (eds.) Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: Guilford Press, 2009, pp. 162—179.
- Rubin K.H., Bukowski M.W., Laursen B. Social, emotional, and personality development in context. Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: The Guilford Press, 2009. 672 p.
- Rubin K.H., Bukowski W., Parker J. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Eisenberg N. (eds.) Handbook of child psychology: social, emotional, and personality development. NY: Wiley, 2006, pp. 571—645.
- Santoyo V.C. Behavioral assessment of social interactions in natural settings. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 1996, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 124—131. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.12.2.124
- Silverman L.K. Asynchronous development. In Neihart M., Reis S.M., Robinson N.M., Moon S.M. (eds.) The socialand emotional development of gifted children: what do weknow?. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, 2002, pp. 31—39.
- Silverman L.K. Social and emotional education of the gifted: The discoveries of Leta Hollingworth [Elektronnyi resurs]. Roeper Review, 1990, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 171—179. Available at: http://www.positivedisintegration.com/Silverman1990.pdf (Accessed 02.07.2018).
- Subotnik R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius P., Worrell F.C. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: a proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2011, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3—54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056
- The R Project for Statistical Computing [Elektronnyi resurs]. Available at: http://www.R-project.org (Accessed 02.07.2018).
- Vialle W., Heaven P.C.L., Ciarrochi J. The relationship between self-esteem and academic achievement in high ability students: Evidence from the Wollongong Youth Study [Elektronnyi resurs]. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 2005, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 39—45. Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2641&context=hbspapers (Accessed 02.07.2018).
- Wentzel K.R. Peers and academic functioning at school. In Rubin K.H., Bukowski M.W., Laursen B. (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. NY: The Guilford Press, 2009, pp. 531—548.
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 1525
Previous month: 10
Current month: 2
Downloads
Total: 457
Previous month: 2
Current month: 0