Topical Theoretical and Methodological Issues of Complex Psychological and Psychiatry Inquiry

The article deals with theoretical and methodological issues of complex psychological and psychiatry inquiry in criminal and civil law proceedings. It proves the understanding of forensic psychological expert knowledge as a post-non-classical science. Psychotechnical approach is regarded as the ground for forensic inquiry methodology. The mechanism of transformation of general psychological theoretical knowledge into special sphere of a forensic psychology expert’s knowledge is analyzed according to the principle of comparative expertology; the theory of expert notions is outlined. The principle of dialectic unity of integration and differentiation of expert sciences related to the subject (forensic psychology and forensic psychiatry) is embodied in descriptive models of integrative psychological-psychiatric decision. The problem of special knowledge of a forensic psychology expert is analyzed: paradigm model of its structure is elaborated and multidisciplinary nature of its development is shown. The representations of a forensic psychology expert as a specialist is discussed in the context of Bologna process principles implementation in the educational system. Professional specialized competences necessary for a forensic psychology expert are described.

1. Artem'eva E. Ju. Osnovy psihologii sub#ektivnoj semantiki. M., 1999.
2. Vandysh-Bubko V. V. Ogranichennaja vmenjaemost': principy sudebno-psihiatricheskoj ocenki // Medicinskaja i sudebnaja psihologija. Kurs lekcij / Pod red. T. B. Dmitrievoj, F. S. Safuanova. M., 2009.
3. Vasiljuk F. E. Metodologicheskij smysl psihologicheskogo shizisa // Voprosy psihologii. 1986. № 6.
4. Vinberg A. I., Malahovskaja N. T. Sudebnaja jekspertologija. Volgograd, 1979.
5. Vygotskij L. S. Istoricheskij smysl psihologicheskogo krizisa // Sobr.soch.: V 6 t., M., 1982. T. 1.
6. Dozorceva E. G. Kompleksnaja sudebnaja psihologo-psihiatricheskaja jekspertiza nesovershennoletnego obvinjaemogo // Medicinskaja i sudebnaja psihologija. Kurs lekcij / Pod red. T. B. Dmitrievoj, F. S. Safuanova. M., 2009.
7. Kochenov M. M. Teoreticheskie osnovy sudebno-psihologicheskoj jekspertizy: Avtoref. diss.… dokt. psihol. nauk. M., 1991.
8. Kudrjavcev I. A. Sudebnaja psihologo-psihiatricheskaja jekspertiza. M., 1988.
9. Lavrinovich A. N., Golev A. S. Jekspertnye ponjatija v praktike sudebnoj psihologo-psihiatricheskoj jekspertizy // Juridicheskaja psihologija: Tez. dokl. k VII s#ezdu Obwestva psihologov SSSR. M., 1989.
10. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. M., 1985.
11. Safuanov F. S. Sudebno-psihologicheskaja jekspertiza v ugolovnom processe. M., 1998.
12. Safuanov F. S. Psihologija kriminal'noj agressii. M., 2003.
13. Safuanov F. S. Kompleksnaja sudebnaja psihologo-psihiatricheskaja jekspertiza v grazhdanskom processe // Medicinskaja i sudebnaja psihologija. Kurs lekcij / Pod red. T. B. Dmitrievoj, F. S. Safuanova. M., 2009.
14. Sekerazh T. N. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy diagnostiki «poroka voli» v sudebnoj psihologicheskoj jekspertize: Diss. … kand. jurid. nauk. M., 2004.
15. Sitkovskaja O. D. Psihologija ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti. M., 1998.
16. Standarty sudebno-psihiatricheskih jekspertnyh issledovanij Gosudarstvennogo nauchnogo centra social'noj i sudebnoj psihiatrii im. V. P. Serbskogo / Pod red. T. B. Dmitrievoj, E. V. Makushkina. M., 2000.
17. Stepin V. S. Teoreticheskoe znanie. Struktura, istoricheskaja jevoljucija. M., 2000.
18. Shipshin S. S. Sudebno-psihologicheskaja jekspertiza psihicheskogo sostojanija voditelja po delam o dorozhno-transportnyh proisshestvijah: Diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. M., 1998.
19. Shishkov S. N. Nevmenjaemost'. M., 2010.