Psycho-linguistic study of interrogation videos: problems and possible solutions

 
Audio is AI-generated
2894

Abstract

The article examines the problems of studying the investigation video to establish credibility of the evidence, to specify emotional state, individual psychological characteristics and the psychological impact on the person being interrogated. These problems are mostly caused by the lack of a single scientifically-based methodological approach while сurrently used approaches are not developed sufficiently. We propose a fundamentally new scientifically-based psycho-linguistic approach to the study of investigation video, including the analysis of voice and sounding speech, linguistic analysis (the content and form of speech) and psychological analysis. We considered value, subject, object, and objectives of interrogation videos examination. Study of interrogation videos using the current approach is significant from the point of view of criminal law because of admissibility of evidence by the investigators. The expert concept of suggestive interrogate was operationalized on the basis of linguistic and psychological classifications.

General Information

Keywords: study of investigation videos, psycho-linguistic examination, admissibility of evidence, suggestive interrogate.

Journal rubric: Methodological Problems of Legal Psychology

OpenAlex citations: 5

OpenAlex trends: Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication, Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies, Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies

Information about the work in OpenAlex

Number of citations: 5

Topics

Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication

This cluster of papers focuses on discourse analysis, cultural communication patterns, and language use in the context of the pandemic. It explores topics such as media representation, persuasion strategies, linguistic aspects of pandemics, and the impact of social media on language and culture.

Number of works: 106512  |  Total number of citations: 87483

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies

This cluster of papers explores the complexities of intercultural communication in various contexts, including education and business. It delves into topics such as language, cultural competence, media discourse, professional identity, and the challenges and strategies of cross-cultural communication. The influence of globalization on communication and the development of linguistic and cultural skills are also central themes.

Number of works: 47093  |  Total number of citations: 70052

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics in social sciences and humanities, including migration, management, culture, economy, language, religion, innovation, education, ethnicity, and law. The papers explore various aspects of these subjects within the context of different regions and countries.

Number of works: 19748  |  Total number of citations: 23272

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Work details in OpenAlex

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015100207

Published

For citation: Gagina, O.V., Kuznetsov, V.O., Sekerazh, T.N. (2015). Psycho-linguistic study of interrogation videos: problems and possible solutions. Psychology and Law, 5(2), 93–104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015100207

© Gagina O.V., Kuznetsov V.O., Sekerazh T.N., 2015

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Belkin R.S. Taktika doprosa // E.M. Livshic, R.S. Belkin Taktika sledstvennyh dejstvij. M.: «Novyj Jurist», 1997.176 s.
  2. Bryzgunova E.A. Sredstva vyrazhenija neizvestnogo v voprose (vzaimodejstvie leksiki, konteksta i intonacii) // Russkaja grammatika: nauchnye trudy: v 2 t. / Gl. red. N.Ju. Shvedova. M.: In-t russkogo jazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova, 2005. T. 2. S. 397–401.
  3. Gavrilova N.I. Vlijanie vnushenija na formirovanie svidetel'skih pokazanij. Avtoref. diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. M., 1975. 12 s.
  4. Gagina O.V., Kuznecov V.O. Issledovanie soderzhanija audio- i videozapisej operativnyh i sledstvennyh dejstvij: sovremennoe sostojanie i perspektivy razvitija // Teorija i praktika sudebnoj jekspertizy. 2014. № 1 (33). S. 45–48.
  5. Glazyrin F.V. Psihologija sledstvennyh dejstvij. Volgograd,1983. 76 s.
  6. Gulevich O.A. Psihologicheskie aspekty jurisprudencii. M.: MPSI, 2009. 512 s.
  7. Znakov V.V. Nepravda, lozh' i obman kak problemy psihologii ponimanija // Voprosy psihologii. 1993. № 2. S. 9–16.
  8. Issleduem lozh': Teorii, praktika obnaruzhenija / Pod red. M. L'juisa, K. Saarni. SPb.: Prajm-Evroznak, 2004. 282 s.
  9. Leontev A.A. Prikladnaja psiholingvistika rechevogo obshhenija i massovoj kommunikacii / Pod red. A.S. Markosjan, D.A. Leont'eva, Ju.A. Sorokina. M.: Smysl, 2008. 272 s.
  10. Praktika primenenija ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii. Aktual'nye voprosy sudebnoj praktiki, rekomendacii sudej Verhovnogo suda RF po primeneniju ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva na osnove novejshej sudebnoj praktiki / Pod red. V.M. Lebedeva. M.: Jurajt, 2013. 1069 s.
  11. Prikladnaja juridicheskaja psihologija / Pod red. A.M. Stoljarenko. M.: Juniti, 2001. 639 s.
  12. Ratinov A.R. Sudebnaja psihologija dlja sledovatelej. M.: Jurlitinform, 1976. 352 s.
  13. Ratinov A.R., Adamov Ju.P. Lzhesvidetel'stvo (proishozhdenie, predotvrashhenie i razoblachenie lozhnyh pokazanij). M.: Jurlitinform, 1976. 90 s.
  14. Russkaja grammatika: nauchnye trudy: v 2 t. / Gl. red. N.Ju. Shvedova. M.: In-t russkogo jazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova , 2005. 1496 s.
  15. Safuanov F.S., Shishkov S.N. Jekspertiza «pravdivosti» pokazanij (Vozmozhnosti psihologicheskoj jekspertizy) [Jelektronnyj resurs] // Zakonnost'. 1992. № 2. S. 13–14.
  16. Sekerazh T.N. Jekspertnye oshibki pri proizvodstve sudebnoj psihologicheskoj jekspertizy // Sudebnaja jekspertiza: tipichnye oshibki / Pod red. E.R. Rossinskoj. M.: Prospekt, 2012. S. 211–222.
  17. Simonenko S.I. Psihologicheskie osnovanija ocenki lozhnosti i pravdivosti soobshhenij // Voprosy psihologii. 1998. № 3. S. 78–84.
  18. Sorokotjagin I.N. Pravovaja i juridicheskaja psihologija (psihologija jurisprudencii). Ekaterinburg:, UrGJuA, 2002. 356 s.
  19. Fraj O. Detekcija lzhi i obmana. SPb.: Prajm-EVROZNAK, 2005. 320 s.
  20. Shapovalov V.A. Metodika opredelenija psihologicheskih priznakov dostovernosti/nedostovernosti pokazanij v juridicheskoj praktike: metod. posobie. K.: Jurist, 2013. 178 s.
  21. Shihancov G.G. Juridicheskaja psihologija. M.: Zercalo, 1998. 352 s.
  22. Jampolskij A.E. Psihologija doprosa podozrevaemogo. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR, 1978. 46 s.

Information About the Authors

Olga V. Gagina, Head of the Expert Department, Ederal Budget Institution Bryansk Forensic Laboratory of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Bryansk, Russian Federation, e-mail: brlse@yandex.ru

Vitaly O. Kuznetsov, Candidate of Science (Philology), Head of the Expert Department, Federal Budget Institution Bryansk Forensic Laboratory of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Bryansk, Russian Federation, e-mail: brlse@yandex.ru

Tatiana N. Sekerazh, Candidate of Science (Law), Docent, Head of the Department of Psychological Expertise, Russian Federal Center of Forensic Science named after professor A.R. Shlyakhov of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor of the Department of Clinical and Forensic Psychology, Faculty of Legal and Forensic Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7619-6992, e-mail: sekerage@mail.ru

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 15092
Previous month: 44
Current month: 47

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 2894
Previous month: 10
Current month: 15

 Total

Whole time: 17986
Previous month: 54
Current month: 62