To forget or to remember: Denial deflation effect and subjective confidence of autobiographical memories

1047

Abstract

The paper focuses on the problem of the long-lasting effect of deliberate lie on autobiographical memories, which seems to be of extreme importance for forensic psychology. Firstly, the literature on autobiographical memory’s malleability is reviewed in the context of legal issues. Then we present the empirical field study carried out to examine dynamics of confidence toward episodes of personal past after participants had been instructed a) to retell a false episode as true; b) to retell a false episode as false; c) to deny the reality of a true episode. We coined the main finding as “Denial deflation”. This effect exists in two forms. The first is forgetting of falsely denied true episode. The second is mistaken acceptance of truthfully denied false episode. Our findings indicate that the act of lying produces specific effect on memory performance both for intentional creation of false story and for intentional denial of true experience.

General Information

Keywords: autobiographical memory, lie, subjective confidence, autobiographical memory’s malleability

Journal rubric: Interdisciplinary Studies

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2015100210

For citation: Nurkova V.V. To forget or to remember: Denial deflation effect and subjective confidence of autobiographical memories [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2015. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 126–137. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2015100210. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Nourkova V.V. Problema istinnosti avtobiograficheskih vospominanij v processe sudoproizvodstva // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1998. T. 19. №5. S. 15–30.
  2. Nourkova V., Bernshtejn D. Korrespondentnyj podhod v izuchenii pamjati i problema istinnosti vospominanij // Uchenye zapiski kafedry obshhej psihologii Moskovskogo universiteta. Vyp. 2 / Pod red. B.S. Bratusja, E.E. Sokolovoj. M.: Smysl, 2006. S. 160–177.
  3. Nourkova V.V. Doverchivaja pamjat': Kak informacija vkljuchaetsja v sistemu avtobiograficheskih znanij // Kognitivnye issledovanija: sb. nauchnyh trudov. T. 2 / Pod red. V.D. Solov'eva i T.V. Chernigovskoj. M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2008. S. 87–102.
  4. Nourkova V.V., Vasilenko D.A. Formirovanie variativnogo repertuara samoopredeljajushhih vospominanij kak sredstvo razvitija samoidentichnosti // Vestnik Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Serija Psihologicheskie nauki. 2013. № 18(119). S. 11–30.
  5. Nourkova V.V. Problema netochnosti vospominanij v perspektive mnogokomponentnoj modeli pamjati // Mir psihologii [v pech.].
  6. Cima M., Nijman H., Meckelbach H., Kremer K. & Hollnack S. Сlaims of crime-related amnesia in forensic patients // International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2004. Vol. 27. P. 215–221.
  7. Culhane S. E., Hosch H. M. Changed alibis: Current law enforcement, future law enforcement and layperson reactions // Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2012. Vol.39. P. 958–977. doi: 10.1177/0093854812438185
  8. Frenda S.J, Nichols R.M. & Loftus E.F. Current issues and advances in misinformation research // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011. Vol. P.20–23.
  9. Lindsay D.S., Johnson M.K. False memories and the source monitoring framework: Reply to Reyna and Lloyd (1997) // Learning and Individual Differences. 2000. Vol. 12(2). P.145–161.
  10. Olson E.A., Charman S.D. «But can you prove it?» Examining the quality of innocent suspects’ alibis // Psychology, Crime, and Law. 2012. Vol. 18. P. 453–471. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.505567
  11. Oorsouw K.V., Merckelbach H. Simulating amnesia and memories of a mock crime // Psychology, Crime & Law. 2006. Vol. 12:3. P. 261–271.
  12. Polage D.C. Fabrication deflation? The mixed effects of lying on subsequent memory // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2004. Vol. 18. P. 455–465.
  13. Polage D.C. Liar, Liar, Memory on Fire // Symposium of University Research and Creative Expression (SOURCE). 2013, May 16. Paper 93. URL: http://digitalcommons.cwu.edu/source/2013/oral presentations/93.
  14. Polage D. Fabrication inflation increases as source monitoring ability decreases // Acta Psychologica. 2012. Vol. 139(2). P. 335–342. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.007
  15. Strange D., Dysart J., Loftus E.F. Why errors in alibies are not necessarily evidence of guilt // Zeitschrift fur Psychologie. 2014. Vol. 222(2). P.82–89.

Information About the Authors

Veronika V. Nurkova, Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leading researcher at the School of Anthropology of the Future, Institute of Social Sciences of the Russian National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (RANEPA), Associate Professor of the Faculty of the Effective Academy of Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3117-3081, e-mail: vernur@yahoo.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 4891
Previous month: 29
Current month: 22

Downloads

Total: 1047
Previous month: 1
Current month: 6