Psychology and Law
2016. Vol. 6, no. 1, 9–17
doi:10.17759/psylaw.2016060102
ISSN: 2222-5196 (online)
Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments
Abstract
The article presents objections to the arguments set out in article «Revisiting an issue of mandatory assignment of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of legal capability: pro arguments» by P.Yu. Kantor in favor of legislative recognition of mandatory complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination of legal capability in the case of adjudge a citizen incapable due to mental disorder. From the point of view of the theory and methodology of complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination, the authors inappropriately constrict competence limits of forensic psychiatrists and ignore the possibility and the need to integrate medical and psychological knowledge in forensics. P. Yu. Kantor’s theses about the total dominance of psychiatric examinations in civil proceedings and a painful and humiliating for subject forensic psychiatric examination in Russia are objectionable. The present paper shows negative organizational and legal consequences of this legal norm and proposes a wide interdisciplinary discussion on the problem.
General Information
Keywords: limited dispositive legal capacity, legal incapacitation, complex forensic psychological and psychiatric examination, forensic psychiatric examination in litigation proceedings, mandatory legal enquiry.
Journal rubric: Critics and Bibliography
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2016060102
For citation: Safuanov F.S., Shishkov S.N. Commenting the article by P.Y. Kantor: сounter-arguments [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2016. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–17. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2016060102. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 4199
Previous month: 11
Current month: 1
Downloads
Total: 785
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0