Psychology and Law
2026. Vol. 16, no. 3, 259–272
https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2026160314
ISSN: 2222-5196 (online)
Approaches to the study of intergenerational conflicts in organizations and their classification
Abstract
Context and relevance. The simultaneous presence of three to five age cohorts within a single organizational space makes intergenerational tension in contemporary organizations increasingly systemic, raising the need for a theoretical understanding of the nature and mechanisms of intergenerational conflicts. Objective. The article aims to provide a theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of intergenerational conflicts in modern organizations. Methods and materials. The study is based on methods of conceptual analysis, generalization and a systems approach to understanding theoretical concepts of intergenerational conflicts. Results. A multidimensional classification of types of intergenerational conflict is proposed, based on five criteria. In addition, the determinants of such conflicts are systematized across three levels of analysis: macrosocial, organizational-managerial, and socio-psychological. Conclusions. The findings are of practical relevance for the development of HR tools aimed at diagnosing and managing generational heterogeneity in contemporary organizations.
General Information
Keywords: intergenerational conflict, organization, generational theory, value-oriented approach, social identity theory, ageism, generational heterogeneity, socio-psychological determinants, HR practices
Journal rubric: Interdisciplinary Studies
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2026160314
Received 11.07.2026
Revised 16.08.2026
Accepted
Published
For citation: Latypov, A.F. (2026). Approaches to the study of intergenerational conflicts in organizations and their classification. Psychology and Law, 16(3), 259–272. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2026160314
© Latypov A.F., 2026
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
References
- Aminova, D.K., Eziev, A.M. (2019). Psychological aspects of intergenerational conflicts as a subject of scientific reflection. International Journal of Medicine and Psychology, 2(1), 33—41 (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/yyedkp (viewed: 01.07.2026).
- Glozman, Z.M., Naumova, A.A., Naumova, V.A. (2022). Generations Attitudes from the Point of View of a Modern Primary School Age Child. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 18(1), 90—104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180109
- Grigoryeva, M.V., Shamionov, R.M., Abutalipova, V.K. (2026). Discriminatory attitudes and their value predictors among representatives of different generations. Social Psychology and Society, 17(1), 60—76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2026170104
- Lisovsky, V.T., Ikonnikova, S.N., Ermoshkina, M.A., Skorodumov, A.A. (2000). The Spiritual World and Value Orientations of Russian Youth: A Tutorial. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg University of Humanities and Trade Unions. (In Russ.). URL: https://elibrary.ru/tpmjsv (viewed: 07.2026).
- Mironova, O.I., Golenkov, A.A. (2025). Classification of forced contacts in adolescents prone to addictive behavior who are in social rehabilitation. Psychology and Law, 15(1), 244— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150116
- Mironova, O.I., Kovalevskaia, E.A. (2026). Approaches to studying the development of codependency in family members. Psychology and Law, 16(1), 266— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2026160116
- Mironova, O.I., Rogovaya, O.S. (2026). Developing coping strategies based on an assessment of the difficulties of interacting with codependents. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 19(1), 119— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2026190108
- Postnikova, M.I., Miklyaeva, A.V., Sivrikova, N.V., Regush, L.A. (2022). Changes in the Hardiness of Generationsʼ Representatives of Russians at the Beginning of the XXI Century. Social Psychology and Society, 13(1), 87—103. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130106
- Saporovskaya, M.V. (2020). Intergenerational conflict and psychological well-being of family. Vestnik of Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics, 26(4), 48—54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34216/2073-1426-2020-26-4-48-54
- Appelbaum, S.H., Bhatt, D., Shapiro, B.T., Egan, R. (2022). A study of generational conflicts in the workplace. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(2), 7—15. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2022.7.2.1311
- Butler, R.N. (1969). Age-Ism: Another Form of Bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9(4-1), 243—246.
https://doi.org/1093/geront/9.4_part_1.243 - Cennamo, L., Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891—906. https://doi.org/1108/02683940810904385
- Coser, L. (1956). The Functions of Social Conflict.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
- Costanza, D.P., Badger, J.M., Fraser, R.L., Severt, J.B., Gade, P.A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375—394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9259-4
- Costanza, D.P., Finkelstein, L.M. (2015). Generationally Based Differences in the Workplace: Is There a There There? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(3), 308—323. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.15
- Dencker, J.C., Joshi, A., Martocchio, J.J. (2007). Employee benefits as context for intergenerational conflict. Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 208—220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.04.002
- Hansen, J.C., Leuty, M.E. (2012). Work Values Across Generations. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(1), 34—52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711417163
- Jehn, K.A., Chatman, J.A. (2000). The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(1), 56—73. https://doi.org/1108/eb022835
- Mannheim, K. (1952). The Problem of Generations. In: K. MannheimEssays on the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276—322). London: Routledge & K. Paul.
- Parry, E., Urwin, P. (2011). Generational Differences in Work Values: A Review of Theory and Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79—96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x
- Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A. (2022). Organizational Behavior (18th updated ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
- Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68—78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Schein, E.H. (1978). Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organizational Needs.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Schein, E.H. (1990). Career Anchors: Discovering Your Real Values.San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer & Company.
- Smola, K.W., Sutton, C.D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 363—382. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.147
- Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations(pp. 33—47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Twenge, J.M., Campbell, S.M., Hoffman, B.J., Lance, C.E. (2010). Generational Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117—1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246
- Urick, M.J., Hollensbe, E.C., Fairhurst, G.T. (2017). Understanding and managing intergenerational conflict: An examination of influences and strategies. Work, Agingand Retirement, 3(2), 166—185. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw009
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Web Views
Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0
PDF Downloads
Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0
Total
Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0