The problem of the differentiation of expert attitudes of emotional states and affect

989

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study of trust between employees of a penal colony (inspectors and employees of the production zone), and women who are serving sentences for the crimes of 1) small and moderate, 2) such grave and particularly grave crimes. There were used a modification of the methods of assessment of trust/distrust by A. B. Kupreychenko, M. Rosenberg's Faith in People Scale, Acceptance of Others Scale by William F. Fey and J. Campbell’s Benevolence Scale. The fact of greater confidence on the part of employees of the production department to the women who are serving a sentence for a grave or especially grave crime was fixed, it was explained the specifics of their interaction in the work. The general trend to exercise greater trust by inmates to employees of the penal system was detected than their response reaction that appear of a greater degree of distrust.

General Information

Keywords: psychological setting, simulate, affect.

Journal rubric: Forensic and Clinical Psychology in Legal Context

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2017070114

For citation: Morozova M., Savina O. The problem of the differentiation of expert attitudes of emotional states and affect [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2017. Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 169–181. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2017070114. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Kudryavtsev I. A., Lavrinovich A. N., Moskalenko E. P., Safuanov F. S. Osobennosti patopsychologicteskoj kvalifikaxcii resultatov eksperimentalno-psychologitceskogo issledovanija v uslovijach sudebno-psychiatritceskoj expertizy [Peculiarities of pathopsychological qualification of the results of experimental-psychological research in the conditions of judicial-psychiatric examination]. М., 1985. 27 p.
  2. Kudryavtsev I. A., Safuanov F. S. Patopsychologitceskie simtomokomplexy narushenij poznavatelnoj dejatelnosti pri psichitceskich zabolevanijach: faktornaja struktura i diagnostitceskaja informativnost [Pathopsychological symptom of disorders of cognitive activity in mental illness: the factor structure and diagnostic informativeness] // Jurnal nevropatologii i psichiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 1989. no. 6. pp. 86-92.
  3. Kudryavtsev I. A., Morozova M. V., Savina O. F. Principy sbora i analiza expertnoj informacii // Metoditceskoe posobie [Principles of obtaining and analyzing expert information : Handbook] // Sbornik metoditceskich rekomendacij i posobij dlja vratcej pod red. T.B. Dmitrievoj / О sovremennych vidach i metodach komplexnych sudebno-psyhiatritceskich exspertnych issledovanij. Мoscow: Publ. RIO FGU «GNCSSP Roszdrava», 2008. pp. 81-130.
  4. Morozova M. V., Savina O. F., Safuanov F. S., Tkachenko A. A. K voprosu differenciacii i expertnoj ocenki emocionalnych sostojanij [The question of differentiation and forensic evaluation of emotional States] // Ros. Psychiatr. jurn. 2014. no. 5. pp. 38-46.
  5. Pelipas V. E. Simulyatcija psychitceskich rasstrojstv i ejo raspoznavanie pri sudebno-psyhiatritceskoj exspertize [Simulation of mental disorders and its recognition in the forensic psychiatric examination: methodological guidance] // pod nautcnym rukovodstvom Shostakovicha B.V. Мoscow, 1983. 26 p.
  6. Rubinstein S. J. Experimentalnyje methodiki pathopsychologii i opyt primeneniya ich v klinike (praktitceskoe rukovodstvo) [Experimental methods of pathopsychology and experience of their application in the clinic (a practical guide). Мoscow: Publ. Aprel-Press, izd-vo Instituta psichoterapii, 2004. 222 p.
  7. Safuanov F. S. Affekt: sudebno-psichologitceskij expertologitceskij analis [Affect: forensic psychological expertology analysis] // Psichologitceskij jurnal. 2001. no.3. pp.15-25.
  8. Safuanov F. S., Dozortseva E. G., Pechernikova T. P., Shishkov S. N., Sulimovskiy E. I. Sudebno-psichologitceskije expertnyje kriterii diagnostiki affekta u obvinjaemogo: Posobie dlja vratcej i psichologov [Forensic psychological expert diagnostic criteria affect the accused : a Manual for physicians and psychologists] // Pod red. T. B. Dmitrievoy, E. V. Matushkina. М., 2007. 43 p.
  9. Safuanov F.S. Sudebno-psichologitceskaja expertiza. Utcebnik. [Forensic psychiatric examination. Tutorial.]. // Мoscow: Publ. Yurajt., 2014. 421 p.
  10. Safuanov F. S., Savina O. F., Morozova M. V., Isaeva I. V. Kriterii sudebno-psichologitceskoj expertnoj otcenki yuriditceski relevantnych sostojanij u obvinjaemych : Metoditceskie rekomendacii. [Criteria for psychological expert assessment of legally relevant emotional state of the accused : guidelines.]. Мoscow: Publ. FGBU «FMICPN im. V.P. Serbskogo» Minzdrava Rossii. 2016. 28 p.
  11. Tkachenko A. A. Simulatcija i dissimulatcija psichitceskich rasstrojstv [Simulation and dissimulate mental disorders.] // Rukovodstvo po sudebnoj psichiatrii : Prakt. posobiye / pod red. Tkachenko A. A. – 2-е izd., pererab. i dop. Мoscow : Publ. Yurajt, 2013. pp.448-509.

Information About the Authors

Marina Morozova, PhD in Psychology, senior Researcher Laboratory of Psychology, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-209X, e-mail: ekspertiza21@mail.ru

Olga Savina, PhD in Psychology, Leading Researcher Laboratory of Psychology, V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7548-5239, e-mail: psyhol1@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3103
Previous month: 24
Current month: 27

Downloads

Total: 989
Previous month: 2
Current month: 1