Study of Stress Tolerance and Resilience of Employees of Penal System

837

Abstract

The article presents the results of a psychological survey of 90 employees, who determined the level of organizational stress and a degree of development of two professionally important qualities - stress tolerance and resilience. Three psychodiagnostic methods were used: 1) K. McLean scale of organizational stress in N. Vodopyanova's adaptation; 2) the method of studying stress tolerance as a socio-psychological quality of a person; 3) S. Muddy test of resilience. It was found that about 75% of employees deferred by a low overall level of organizational stress and at the same time they had a high level of stress tolerance and resilience; 17% of employees demonstrated a high level of organizational stress, 6% of which was characterized by a low level of stress tolerance. The consistent patterns are established as a result of the correlation analysis: the more active and productive an employee is, the higher his resilience and vice versa; the older the employee, the lower his control indicator; with increasing work experience, flexibility in employee behavior increases. The results of a comparative analysis by gender mark significant differences in the overall level of stress tolerance (higher among women) and the ability of self-knowledge (more developed among men). The psychological conditions for increasing stress tolerance and resilience on an individual level, as well as social and psychological conditions for reducing organizational stress are described.

General Information

Keywords: penal system, employees, organizational stress, stress tolerance, resilience, gender comparative analysis, psychological and pedagogical work with employees, professional burnout.

Journal rubric: Psychology of Professional Activity

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090208

For citation: Tsvetkova N.A., Kulakova S.V. Study of Stress Tolerance and Resilience of Employees of Penal System [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 112–129. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2019090208. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Aleksandrova L.A. K osmysleniyu ponyatiya «zhiznestoikost' lichnosti» v kontekste problematiki psikhologii sposobnostei [To understand the concept of "viability of personality" in the context of the problematic of the psychology of abilities]. Psikhologiya sposobnostei: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovanii: Materialy nauch. konf. [Psychology of abilities: Current state and prospects of research: Materials of scientific. conf] Moscow: IP RAN, 2005, pp. 16—21.
  2. Alekseeva O.S., Nilova L.A., Tsvetkova N.A. Sravnitel'nyi analiz lichnostnykh kharakteristik sotrudnikov ugolovno-ispolnitel'noi sistemy v zavisimosti ot urovnya ekspertnoi otsenki ikh lichnosti [Comparative analysis of the personal characteristics of the staff of the penitentiary system, depending on the level of peer review]. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya. [Applied legal psychology] 2017, no. 4(41), pp. 32—42.
  3. Buly`gina V.G., Shport S.V., Dubinskij A.A., Vasil`chenko A.S. Psikhologicheskie i psikhovegetativny`e tekhnologii diagnostiki i korrekczii povedeniya speczialistov, rabotayushhikh v e`kstremal`ny`kh usloviyakh (sostoyanie problemy` i perspektivny`e issledovaniya) [Psychological and psychovegetative technologies of diagnostics and correction of behavior of the specialists working in extreme conditions (a condition of a problem and perspective researches)]// Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and law]. 2016. Tom 6, no 3, pp. 14—29. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2016060302.
  4. Vodop'yanova N.E. Psikhodiagnostika stressa. [Psychodiagnostics of stress] St. Petersburg.: Piter [Peter], 2009, 336 p.
  5. Gryaznov S.A. Analiz sistem podgotovki rabotnikov ugolovno-ispolnitel'noi sistemy: Rossiiskii i zarubezhnyi opyt [Analysis of the training systems of the penitentiary system employees: Russian and foreign experience]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Izvestiya of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2015, no. 1, pp. 27—30.
  6. Dmitrieva M.G. Osobennosti professional'no vazhnykh kachestv sotrudnikov FSIN Rossii [Features of professionally important qualities of the staff of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia]. Vestnik ChGPU [Bulletin of the CSPU]. 2014, no. 2, pp. 100—105.
  7. Kulakova S.V., Tsvetkova N.A. Suitsidal'noe povedenie sotrudnikov ugolovno-ispolnitel'noi sistemy kak aktual'naya problema [Suicidal behavior of the penitentiary system staff as an actual problem]. Suitsidologiya [Suicidology]. 2017, T. 8, no. 4 (29), pp. 91—98.
  8. Kulakova S.V. Speczifika proyavlenij sindroma professional`nogo vy`goraniya u praktikuyushhikh psikhologov [The specificity of manifestations of the syndrome of professional burnout in practicing psychologists] [E`lektronny`j resurs] // Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and law] 2015. Tom 5, no 1, pp. 80—89. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2015/n1/76155.shtml (data obrashheniya: 14.12.2018).
  9. Nikolaeva N.V., Konopleva I.N. Vy`razhennost` stressovogo napryazheniya i rabotosposobnost` sotrudnikov pravookhranitel`ny`kh organov [The intensity of stress and efficiency of law enforcement officers] [E`lektronny`j resurs] // Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychology and law] 2014. no 2. pp. 87—100. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyandlaw/2014/n2/69869.shtml (data obrashheniya: 14.01.2019).
  10. Lebedeva A.D. Professional'naya podgotovka i perepodgotovka rabotnikov ugolovno-ispolnitel'noi sistemy — vazhneishee napravlenie optimizatsii kadrovogo obespecheniya v usloviyakh reformirovaniya UIS [Professional training and retraining of the penitentiary system staff is the most important direction in the optimization of personnel provision in the context of the MIS reforming]. Obshchestvo: politika, ekonomika, pravo [Society: politics, economics, law]. 2016, no. 3, pp. 118—120.
  11. Leont'ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestoikosti. Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo po novoi metodike psikhologicheskoi diagnostiki lichnosti s shirokoi oblast'yu primeneniya [Test of resilience. Methodical guidance on the new method of psychological diagnosis of a person with a wide range of applications]. Moscow.: Smysl [Meaning], 2006, 63 p.
  12. Loginova M.V. Zhiznestoikost' kak vnutrennii klyuchevoi resurs lichnosti [Viability as an internal key resource of the individual]. Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2009, no. 6, p.p. 19—22.
  13. Mamchenko A.M. Sostoyanie beznadezhnosti i uroven' zhiznestoikosti u zaklyuchennykh pod strazhu v SIZO [Hopelessness and the level of resilience in custody in jail]. Uchenye zapiski RGSU [Scientific notes of the RSSU]. 2017, no. 4 (143), pp. 39—48.
  14. Mamchenko A.M., Tsvetkova N.A. Issledovanie svyazi zhiznestoikosti s urovnem suitsidal'nogo riska u podsledstvennykh, soderzhashchikhsya v sledstvennom izolyatore [Investigation of the connection of viability with the level of suicidal risk in the persons under investigation in the remand center]. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya [Applied legal psychology]. 2017, no. 3 (40), pp. 41—49.
  15. Nalivaiko T.V. Issledovanie zhiznestoikosti i ee svyazei so svoistvami lichnosti Dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Investigation of resilience and its connections with personality traits. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Chelyabinsk, 2006. 175 p.
  16. Permyakova A.S., Popova L.V. Petrov S.B. Vliyanie urovnya trevozhnosti i stressoustoichivosti na kachestvo zhizni u sotrudnikov silovykh struktur RF [Influence of the level of anxiety and stress resistance on the quality of life among employees of the Russian law enforcement agencies]. Vyatskii meditsinskii vestnik [Vyatsky medical bulletin]. 2015, no. 4 (48), pp. 40—43.
  17. Fominova A.N. Proyavlenie zhiznestoikosti lichnosti v usloviyakh sotsial'noi stratifikatsii obshchestva [Elektronnyi resurs] [Manifestation of a person's vitality in conditions of social stratification of society]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education]. 2012, no. 5, Available at: http://science-education.ru/ru/article /view?id= 7259 (Accessed: 04.08.2018). (In Russ., Abstr. in Engl.).
  18. Khachaturova M.R. Sovladayushchii repertuar lichnosti: obzor zarubezhnykh issledovanii [A co-ordinating repertoire of personality: an overview of foreign research]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics]. 2013, T.10, no. 3, pp. 160—169.
  19. Tserkovskii A.L. Sovremennye vzglyady na problemu stressoustoichivosti [Modern views on the problem of stress resistance]. Vestnik VGMU [Bulletin of VSMU]. 2011, no. 1, pp. 6—19.
  20. Finney C., Stergiopoulos E., Hensel J., Bonato S., Dewa C.S. (2013). Organizational stressors associated with job stress and burnout in correctional officers: a systematic review // BMC Public Health. 2013. no. 13. 82 p.
  21. Hartley D.J., Davila M.A., Marquart J.W, Mullings J.L. Fear is a Disease: The Impact of Fear and Exposure to Infectious Disease on Correctional Officer Job Stress and Satisfaction // Am J Crim Justice. 2013, no. 38(2). pp. 323—340.
  22. Harvey J. Perceived Physical Health, Psychological Distress, and Social Support Among Prison Officers // Prison J. 2014, Vol. 94(2). R. 242-259.
  23. Khoshaba D. & Maddi S. Early Antecedents of Hardiness // Consulting Psychology Journal. Spring. 1999. Vol. 51. no. 2. pp. 106—117.
  24. Lazarus R. S., Folkman, S. Cognitive theories of stress and the issue of circularity // The Plenum series on stress and coping. Dynamics of stress: Physiological, psychological, and social perspectives. NY., US: Plenum Press, 1986, pp. 63—80.
  25. Misis M., Kim B., Cheeseman K., Hogan N., Lambert E. The impact of correctional officer perceptions of inmates on job stress. // SAGE Open. 2013, no. 3(2), pp. 1—13.
  26. Rumin C., Barros G., Cardozo W., Cavalhero R., Atelli R. O sofrimento Psíquico no trabalho de vigilância em prisões // Psicol Ciênc Prof. 2011, no. 31(1), pp. 188—199.
  27. Tschiedel R.M., Monteiro J.K. Prazer e sofrimento no tra-balho das agentes de segurançapenitenciária // EstudPsicol Natal. 2013, no. 18(3). pp. 527—535.

Information About the Authors

Nadezhda A. Tsvetkova, Doctor of Psychology, associate professor, professor of the Department of Social, General and Clinical Psychology, Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-205X, e-mail: TsvetkovaNA@yandex.ru

Svetlana V. Kulakova, PhD in Education, Senior Researcher, Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8688-2021, e-mail: centr2nii@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 5151
Previous month: 57
Current month: 49

Downloads

Total: 837
Previous month: 12
Current month: 1