Problematique Issues of Motivation for Law-Abiding Behavior in Convicts Serving Their Sentences Under Strict Conditions of Detention

233

Abstract

The article discusses the issues of psychological work with convicts who are malicious violators of the sentence serving regime. It is emphasized that this group of persons presents a particular problem for the correction process given it counteracts the normal functioning of the correctional institution. Based on the analysis of interview data (20 convicted men in a detachment with strict conditions for serving sentences, 15 employees whose activities are directly related to convicts of this category), the major categories of convicts serving sentences in strict conditions are identified. The assumption was confirmed that the majority of persistent violators are ideological follower of the prison subculture, but at the same time they seek to justify their behavior with adverse life circumstances. The measures necessary for working with this group of convicts are discussed, with the aim of activation of the law-abiding attitude.

General Information

Keywords: convicted, mode, malicious offender, strict conditions of serving a sentence, deformation of justice, prison subculture.

Journal rubric: Penitentiary Psychology and Penal Practice

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090417

For citation: Suchkova E., Shtefan E.F. Problematique Issues of Motivation for Law-Abiding Behavior in Convicts Serving Their Sentences Under Strict Conditions of Detention [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 236–248. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2019090417. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Antonyan Yu.M. Osnovnye motivy povedeniya osuzhdennykh [Basic motives of prisoners’ behavior]. // Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie [Man: crime and punishment], 2009. no. 1. pp.9—19.
  2. Babayan S.L. O tselesoobraznosti glubokoi differentsiatsii uslovii otbyvaniya nakazaniya v ispravitel'nykh koloniyakh [On the feasibility of deep differentiation of conditions of serving of punishment in correctional colonies]. // Mezhdunarodnyi penitentsiarnyi zhurnal [International penitentiary journal], 2016. no. 4. pp. 6—9. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  3. Debol'skii M.G. Vozmozhnosti psikhologicheskoi sluzhby ugolovno-ispolnitel'noi sistemy v realizatsii tselei nakazaniya [Capabilities of psychological service of penal system in realization of the punishment goals]. // Razvitie lichnosti [Personal Development], 2012. no. 3. pp. 231— 242. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  4. Drozdov A.I. Penitentsiarnaya otvetstvennost' osuzhdennykh, sozdayushchikh ugrozu bezopasnosti ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdenii [The prison responsibility of convicted prisoners creating threat of the security of corrective establishments]. // Vestnik instituta: Prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie [Bulletin of Institute: crime, punishment, correction], 2011. no.2. pp.25—29. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  5. Kurbatova G.V., Kutyakin S.A., Ivanova O.V. Zlostnyi narushitel' rezhima v ispravitel'nykh uchrezhdeniyakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Repeat violator of the regime in correctional institutions of Russian Federation]. // Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya [Applied legal psychology], 2017. no.4. pp.97—100. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  6. Suchkova E.L. Psikhologiya pravosoznaniya osuzhdennykh [Psychology of group legal conscience of convicts]. Vologda: VIPE FSIN Rossii, 2017. 183 p.
  7. Suchkova E.L. Kontseptsiya issledovaniya psikhologii gruppovogo pravosoznaniya osuzhdennykh [Elektronnyy resurs] [The study concept of the psychology of group legal conscience of convicts]. Psikhologiya i pravo [Psychologiâ and law], 2018. vol.8 no. 2. pp. 101—112. doi. 10.17759/psylaw.2018080208. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  8. Suchkova E.L. Napravleniya raboty po korrektsii soderzhaniya psikhologii gruppovogo pravosoznaniya osuzhdennykh [Elektronnyi resurs] [Activity areas on the correction of the psychology content of the convict’s group sense of justice]. // Psikhologiâ i pravo [Psychology and law], 2019. vol. 9. no. 1. pp. 132—143. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2019090110. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  9. Cullen Francis.T. et al. Prisons Do Not Reduce Recidivism. The High Cost of Ignoring Science. The Prison Journal, 2011. vol. 91 (3). pp. 489-659. doi.org/10.1177/0032885511415224
  10. Day Jacob.C. et al. Coercion and Social Support Behand Bars Testing an Integrated Theory of Misconduct and Resistance in U.S. Prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2015. vol. 42(2). pp. 133-155. doi.org/10.1177/0093854814546352

Information About the Authors

Elizaveta Suchkova, PhD in Psychology, associate professor, Department of Organization of Psychological Service in Penal System, Vologda Institute of Law and Economics of the Federal Penal Service of Russia, Vologda, Russia, e-mail: elizavetasuchkova@yandex.ru

Evgeny F. Shtefan, PhD in Psychology, Senior Lecturer, Vologda Institute of Law and Economics of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, Vologda, Russia, e-mail: evg-shtefan@yandex.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1424
Previous month: 17
Current month: 15

Downloads

Total: 233
Previous month: 2
Current month: 8