Role and Involvement of Parents in the Cybergrooming Process

Parents are the main protectors of the child from the dangers of the Internet, including cybergrooming. However, when faced with cybergroomers, not all parents behave optimally. The article discusses the roles that parents can play in such situations. Particular attention is paid to situations when a parent is used by a criminal to influence a child and involve him in sexual activities; the concept of «parent-mediated cybergrooming» is proposed. The empirical study is a analysis of materials from criminal cases, consisting of 33 transcripts of Internet communications between parents and cyber groomers. Typical parental behaviors are described. Three groups of parents were identified depending on their online behavior and the corresponding potential victimization of their children. The conclusion was made about the predominant desire of parents to protect their children (60.7%). However, some parents put their children at risk (15.1%) or direct danger (24.2%) of cybergrooming and other sexual abuse. Variants of prevention of involvement of minors in cybergrooming, including through communication with their parents, are proposed.

1. Berezetskaya M.I. Modern parenting in the digital world // Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya [Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology]. 2019. Vol. 4, pp. 105—112 (In Russ. abstr. in Engl.).
2. Dozortseva E.G., Medvedeva A.S. Sexual online grooming as an object of psychological research [Elektronnyi resurs] // Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2019. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 250—263. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2019090217 (Аccessed: 17.11.2020) (In Russ. abstr. in Engl.).
3. Medvedeva A.S. Reactions of children and adolescents to sexual online grooming. Psikhologiia i pravo. 2020. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 123—132. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2020100111 (Аccessed: 18.03.2021) (In Russ. abstr. in Engl.).
4. Nuсkova E.V. Girls-victims of grooming: risk groups, peculiarities of interaction with an offender, clinical and psychological consequences (DHTE 2020). In Sorokova M.G., Dozortseva E.G., Shemanov A.U. (eds.), collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation. November 19—21. 2020. Moscow: FGBOU VO MGPPU Publ., 2020. Р. 297—300 (In Russ. abstr. in Engl.)
5. Smirnova E.O., Smirnova S.Yu., Sheina E.G. Parents’ strategies to use of digital technology by children [Elektronnyi resurs] // Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology]. 2019. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 79—87. doi:10.17759/jmfp.2019080408 (Аccessed: 28.12.2020) (In Russ. abstr. in Engl.).
6. Soldatova G.U., Lvova E.N. Adolescents Encountering Online Risks: Characteristics of Parental Mediation [Elektronnyi resurs] // Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2018. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 29—41. doi:10.17759/pse.2018230303 (Аccessed: 25.03.2021) (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
7. Soldatova G.U., Rasskazova E.I. Digital Transition Outcomes: From Online Reality to Mixed Reality // Кul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-Historical Psychology], 2020. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 87—97. doi:10.17759/chp.2020160409 (In Russ. abstr. in Engl.)
8. Craven S., Brown S., Gilchrist E. Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations // Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2006. Vol. 12, pp. 287—299
9. Davidson J., Grove-Hills J., Bifulco A., Gottschalk P., Caretti V., Pham T., Webster S. Online Abuse: Literature Review and Policy Context [Elektronnyi resurs] // The European Commission Safer Internet Plus Programme. 2011. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.473.1618&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Аccessed: 19.10.2020)
10. Durkin K.F. Misuse of the Internet by pedophiles: Implications for law enforcement and probation practice // Federal Probation, 1997. Vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 14—18. doi:10.4135/9781452229454
11. Gallagher B. Internet-initiated incitement and conspiracy to commit child sexual abuse (CSA): The typology, extent and nature of known cases // Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2007. Vol. 13, no 2, pp. 101—119. doi:10.1080/13552600701521363
12. Gilad M. Virtual or reality: prosecutorial practices in cyber child pornography ring cases // Richmond Journal of Law & Technology, 2012. Vol. 18, no 2, pp. 1—66
13. Joleby M., Lunde C., Landstrom S., Jonsson L.S. «All of Me Is Completely Different»: Experiences and Consequences Among Victims of Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse // Frontiers in Psychology. 2020. Vol. 11. Р. 1—16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.606218
14. Livingstone S., Palmer T. Identifying vulnerable children online and what strategies can help them [Elektronnyi resurs] // 2012. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/052e/861b8100245db4b95702dc349995b9ec5aea.pdf (Аccessed: 19.10.2020)
15. Magiswary D., Manimekalai J., Thesigarhupani V. Building a Bright Society with Au Courant Parents: Combating Online Grooming [Elektronnyi resurs] // PACIS 2018 Proceedings. 2018. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/317 (Аccessed: 12.01.2021)
16. McAlinden A.M. «Setting 'em up»: Personal, familial and institutional groom­ing in the sexual abuse of children // Social and Legal Studies. 2006. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 339—362. doi:10.1177/0964663906066613
17. McKillop N., Reynald D.M., Rayment-McHugh S. (Re)Conceptualizing the role of guardianship in preventing child sexual abuse in the home // Crime Prevention and Community Safety. 2020. doi:10.1057/s41300-020-00105-7
18. Whittle H., Hamilton-Giachritsis C., Beech A., Collings G. A review of online grooming: Characteristics and concerns // Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2013. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 62—70
19. Whittle H., Hamilton-Giachritsis C., Beech A., Collings G. A review of young people's vulnerabilities to online grooming // Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2013. Vol. 18. Р. 135—146
20. Wolak J., Finkelhor D., Mitchell K.J., Ybarra M.L. Online «predators» and their victims: Myths, realities and implications for prevention and treatment // American Psychologist. 2008. Vol. 63. Р. 111—128