Principles of Model Construction of Psychological Analysis of Interests for Solving Problems of Algorithmization of Law Enforcement (on the Example of Family Law Disputes)

The article outlines the principles of building a model designed for the legal practice of judicial review of disputes based on a psychologically oriented approach. The idea of using such a model in the context of digitalization of law enforcement activities is substantiated. The novelty and peculiarity of the proposed approach will make it possible to identify the interests of the parties to the dispute in a situation of legal uncertainty. In cases where the court is forced to understand interests subjectively due to the lack of guiding principles in legislation and legal doctrine. In the circle of scientific concepts of psychological science, it is proposed to introduce the concept of interest in the meaning necessary for the dispute resolution procedure, a working version of the definition of the concept of interest is formulated. A typology of levels and degrees of interests and a method for determining interests providing additional resources for the peaceful resolution of a family legal dispute have been developed. The possibilities of work are shown by the example of family legal relations in which, by virtue of the law, it is required to identify and justify the interests of the child or the interests of the spouse.

1. Meshcheryakov B.G., Zinchenko V.P. (eds.). Bol’shoi psikhologicheskii slovar’. Moscow: AST, 2009. 811 p. (In Russ.).
2. Zenin S.S., Kuteinikov D.L., Izhaev O.A., Yapryntsev I.M. Pravotvorchestvo v usloviyakh algoritmizatsii prava [Law Making in the Conditions of Algorithmization of Law] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Lex russica, 2020. Vol. 73, no. 7, pp 97–104. doi:10.17803/1729-5920.2020.164.7.097-104 (In Russ.).
3. Krasnova T.V., Kuchinskaya L.A. Prakticheskoe znachenie kategorii «interes» v pravootnosheniyakh roditelei i detei: material’nyi i protsessual’nyi aspekty [Elektronnyi resurs]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, 2016, no. 10, pp. 1318–1322. doi:10.7256/1811-9018.2016.10.20392 (In Russ.).
4. Mukhina V.S. Vozrastnaya psikhologiya. Fenomenologiya razvitiya. Moscow: Akademiya, 2006. 608 p. (In Russ.).
5. Obzor sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii N 3 (2019) (utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda RF 27.11.2019) [Elektronnyi resurs]. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_338859/ (Accessed 08.08.2021). (In Russ.).
6. Osipova N.Yu. Strukturno-semioticheskii podkhod kak aspekt metodologii gumanitarnogo znaniya [Application of Structural Semiotic Methodology in the Humanities]. Kul’turologicheskii zhurnal = Journal of Cultural Research, 2011, no. 3 (5) (In Russ.).
7. Pashentsev D.A. Osobennosti pravoprimeneniya v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obshchestvennykh otnoshenii [Features of law enforcement in the conditions of digitalization of social relations] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo. = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 2020, no. 1, pp. 35–49. doi:10.21638/spbu14.2020.103 (In Russ.).
8. Safuanov F.S., Kharitonova N.K., Rusakovskaya O.A. Psikhologo-psikhiatricheskaya e`kspertiza po sudebny`m sporam mezhdu roditelyami o vospitanii i meste zhitel`stva rebenka. Moscow: Genezis, 2012. 192 p. (In Russ.).
9. Sorokin V.V. Pravovaya psikhologiya v sisteme deistviya prava [Legal Psychology in the System of Law] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2019. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 111–121. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2019090108 (In Russ.).
10. Spektorsky E.V. Filosofiya i yurisprudentsiya. Yuridicheskii vestnik = Legal Bulletin. Moscow, 1913. Kn. II, pp. 60–92 (In Russ.).
11. Stepanyan A.S. Perspektivy primeneniya iskusstvennogo intellekta v semeinykh pravootnosheniyakh: problemy teorii i praktiki [Prospects of Artificial Intelligence Application in Family Relationships: Issues of Theory and Practice]. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo = Family and Housing Law, 2021, no. 3, pp. 26–29. doi:10.18572/1999-477X-2021-3-26-29 (In Russ.).
12. Talapina E.V. Algoritmy i iskusstvennyi intellekt skvoz’ prizmu prav cheloveka [Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in the Human Rights Context] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 10, pp. 25–39. doi:10.12737/jrl.2020.118 (In Russ.).
13. Terekhina S.A. Psikhologicheskiye aspekty ponyatiya “interesy rebenka” [Psychological aspects of the concept “the interests of the child”] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies, 2013, no. 3, pp. 202–209. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2013/n3/62511.shtml (Accessed 08.08.2021). (In Russ.).
14. Terekhina S.A., Pimonov V.A. Problemy zashchity interesov nesovershennoletnikh v sudebnykh delakh po semeinym sporam pri razvode [The problems of defending the interests of juveniles in legal cases of domestic disputes during the divorce] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2016. Vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 91–104. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2016060108 (In Russ.).
15. Tekhnika vedeniya peregovorov notariusami: Prakticheskoe posobie. Moscow: Volters Kluver, 2005. 200 p. (In Russ.).
16. Harari Y.N. Homo Deus: Kratkaya istoriya budushchego [Homo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow]. Moscow: Sindbad, 2018. 520 p. (In Russ.).
17. Chasovskikh K.V. Algoritmizatsiya pravoprimeneniya v sfere zashchity personal’nykh dannykh [Algorithmization of enforcement in the field of personal data protection]. Gaudeamus Igitur, 2018, no. 2, pp. 26–27 (In Russ.).
18. Eko U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu. Saint Petersburg: Petropolis, 1998. 432 p. (In Russ.).
19. 1.       Entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ F.A. Brokgauza i I.A. Efrona. Moscow: Eksmo, 2010. 960 p. (In Russ.).
20. Cappuccio M., Sandova E., Mubin O., Velonaki M. Can Robots Make Us Better Humans? International Journal of Social Robotics, 2021, no. 13, pp. 7–22. doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00700-6

PlumX

article metrics