Why People Justify Violence: The Role of Motivational Foundations in Rape Myths Acceptance



The purpose of this study was to examine the role of existential, epistemic, and relational motivational foundations in the enactment of rape myths. The online study empirically tested a model in which motivational foundations were included as predictors, rape myth acceptance as dependent variables, socio-demographic characteristics (gender, education, and income level) - control variables. A total of 739 Russian residents (381 men and 358 women) aged 18 to 79 years (M=36.8, SD=11.5) participated in the online study. Participants were asked to complete questionnaires to measure need for cognitive closure, belief in a dangerous and competitive world, fear of death, shared reality, and acceptance of rape myths. Structural equation modeling showed that the most significant contribution in the support of the rape myth is made by the need for order (epistemic motivational foundations) and belief in a competitive world (existential motivational foundations). The current research shed light on the main motivational foundations of the rape myth acceptance that might be used in the social programs to reduce tolerance towards violence.

General Information

Keywords: rape myths, belief in a competitive world, need for cognitive closure, belief in a dangerous world, fear of death, gender-based violence

Journal rubric: Methodological Problems of Legal Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140101

Funding. The study was implemented in the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University) in 2024.

Received: 01.09.2023


For citation: Ananyeva O.A., Prusova I.S., Zakharova S.A. Why People Justify Violence: The Role of Motivational Foundations in Rape Myths Acceptance [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2024. Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2024140101. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)


  1. Gulevich O.A., Anikeenok O.A., Bezmenova I.K. Sotsial’nye verovaniya: adaptatsiya metodik Dzh. Dakkita [Social Beliefs: Adaptation of J. Duckitt’s Scales]. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014. Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 68–89. (In Russ.).
  2. Sostoyanie prestupnosti [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ministerstvo vnutrennikh del Rossiiskoi Federatsii = The Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. URL: https://xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/reports/1/ (Accessed 15.07.2023). (In Russ.).
  3. Khudoi mir — ili dobraya ssora? [Elektronnyi resurs]. VTsIOM Novosti = Russian Public Opinion Research Center (JSC “VCIOM”). URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/khudoj-mir-ili-dobraya-ssora (Accessed 15.07.2023). (In Russ.).
  4. Khukhlaev O.E., Pavlova O.S. “Mne izvestno, chto mne nichego ne izvestno”. Sotsial’no-kognitivnye predposylki podderzhki radikal’nykh vzglyadov [“I Know that I don’t Know Anything”. Socio-Cognitive Antecedents of the Radicalization] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2021. Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 87–102. doi:10.17759/sps.2021120307 (In Russ.).
  5. Chistopolskaya K.A., Mitina O.V., Enikolopov S.N., Nikolaev E.L., Semikin G.I., Ozol S.N., Chubina S.A. Sozdanie kratkikh russkoyazychnykh versii oprosnikov “Otnoshenie k smerti” i “Strakh lichnoi smerti” [Construction of short Russian versions of death attitude profile-revised and fear of personal death scale]. Suitsidologiya = Suicidology, Vol. 8, no. 4 (29), pp. 43–55. (In Russ.).
  6. Baldner C., Pierro A. The Trials of Women Leaders in the Workforce: How a Need for Cognitive Closure can Influence Acceptance of Harmful Gender Stereotypes. Sex Roles, 2019. Vol. 80, no. 9-10, pp. 565–577. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0953-1
  7. Balezina M., Zakharova S. Measuring attitudes towards rape in Russia: translation and validation of the Illinois rape myths acceptance scale. Current Psychology, 2023, pp. 1—11. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04666-2
  8. Canto J.M., San Martín J., Perles F., Vallejo M. Persons Who Fear Freedom and Equality Are the Ones Who Most Blame Women Who are Victims of Acquaintance Rape. Violence Against Women, Vol. 27, no. 6-7, pp. 731–747.
  9. Cooke E.M., Lewis R.H., Hayes B.E., Bouffard L.A., Boisvert D.L., Wells J., Kavish N., Woeckene M., Armstrong T.A. Examining the Relationship Between Victimization, Psychopathy, and the Acceptance of Rape Myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2022. Vol. 37, no. 9-10, pp. NP6384–NP6404. doi:10.1177/0886260520966669
  10. Dar-Nimrod I. Death Awareness and Terror Management Theory. In Menzies R.G., Menzies R.E., Dingle G.A. (eds.). Existential Concerns and Cognitive-Behavioral Procedures: An Integrative Approach to Mental Health. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 35–55. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06932-1_3
  11. Duckitt J., Wagner C., Du Plessis I., Birum I. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002. Vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 75–93. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75
  12. Gantman A.P., Paluck E.L. What is the psychological appeal of the serial rapist model? Worldviews predicting endorsement. Behavioural Public Policy, 2022, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1017/bpp.2022.28
  13. Gøtzsche-Astrup O. Pathways to violence: do uncertainty and dark world perceptions increase intentions to engage in political violence? Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 2021. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 142–159. doi:10.1080/19434472.2020.1714693
  14. Hennes E.P., Nam H.H., Stern C., Jost J.T. Not All Ideologies are Created Equal: Epistemic, Existential, and Relational Needs Predict System-Justifying Attitudes. Social Cognition, Vol.30, no. 6, pp. 669–688. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
  15. Higgins E.T. Shared reality: what makes us strong and tears us apart. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2019. 336 p. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190948054.001.0001
  16. Hulin C., Netemeyer R.G., Cudeck R. Can a reliability coefficient be too high? Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–58. doi:10.2307/1480474
  17. Jost J.T. Left and right: the psychological significance of a political distinction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2021. 397 p.
  18. Kay A.C., Jost J.T., Young S. Victim Derogation and Victim Enhancement as Alternate Routes to System Justification. Psychological Science, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 240–246. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x
  19. Kazmi S.M.A., Tarar A.H., Nasir A., Iftikhar R. Victim blaming, prior history to sexual victimization, support for sexually assaulted friends, and rape myths acceptance as predictors of attitudes towards rape victims in the general population of Pakistan. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10. doi:10.1186/s41935-023-00340-7
  20. Łyś A.E., Studzińska A., Bargiel-Matusiewicz K., Nyúl B., Folkierska-Żukowska M. Myths Concerning Sexual Violence Toward Women in Poland, Hungary, and Norway in the Context of System Justification Theory: The Role of Beliefs in the Biological Origins of Gender Differences and Ambivalent Sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2022. Vol. 37, no. 17-18, pp. NP16647–NP16669. doi:10.1177/08862605211023487
  21. Łyś A.E., Bargiel-Matusiewicz K., Krasuski T., Studzińska A. Psychometric properties of the polish updated Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Current Psychology, 2023. Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 445–459. doi:10.2147/PPA.S101904
  22. Murray C., Calderón C., Bahamondes J. Modern Rape Myths: Justifying Victim and Perpetrator Blame in Sexual Violence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1663. doi:10.3390/ijerph20031663
  23. Oliver A., Navarro-Perez J.J., Tomás J.M., Rodrigo M.F. Cognitive and personality variables as predictors of sexism against women in Spanish adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2023. Vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1645–1669. doi:10.1177/02654075221133062
  24. Payne D.L., Lonsway K.A., Fitzgerald L.F. Rape Myth Acceptance: Exploration of Its Structure and Its Measurement Using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 1999. Vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 27–68. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
  25. Polaschek D.L.L., Gannon T.A. The Implicit Theories of Rapists: What Convicted Offenders Tell Us. Sexual Abuse, Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 299–314. doi:10.1177/107906320401600404
  26. Roets A., Van Hiel A. Allport’s Prejudiced Personality Today: Need for Closure as the Motivated Cognitive Basis of Prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011. Vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 349–354. doi:10.1177/0963721411424894
  27. Roets A., Van Hiel A., Dhont K. Is Sexism a Gender Issue? A Motivated Social Cognition Perspective on Men’s and Women’s Sexist Attitudes toward Own and Other Gender. European Journal of Personality, 2012. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 350–359. doi:10.1002/per.843
  28. Rosseel Y. Iavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012. Vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  29. Sankaran S., Kossowska M., Von Hecker U. When do they push the right buttons? Need for closure and the role of perceived control in situations of uncertainty. Personality and Individual Differences, 2023. Vol. 213, no. 5, pp. 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112316
  30. Schreiber J.B., Nora A., Stage F.K., Barlow E.A., King J. Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research, 2006. Vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
  31. Sibley C.G., Wilson M.S., Duckitt J. Antecedents of Men’s Hostile and Benevolent Sexism: The Dual Roles of Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007. Vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 160–172. doi:10.1177/0146167206294745
  32. Sibley C.G., Wilson M.S., Duckitt J. Effects of Dangerous and Competitive Worldviews on Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation over a Five‐Month Period. Political Psychology, Vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 357–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00572.x
  33. Webber D., Kruglanski A., Molinario E., Jasko K. Ideologies that justify political violence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 2020. Vol. 34, pp. 107–111. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.004
  34. Wong P.T. R., Reker G.T., Gesser G. Death Attitude Profile-Revised: A multidimensional measure of attitudes toward death. In R.A. Neimeyer (ed.). Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application. Taylor & Francis, 2015, pp. 121–148.
  35. Xue J., Lin K. Chinese University Students’ Attitudes Toward Rape Myth Acceptance: The Role of Gender, Sexual Stereotypes, and Adversarial Sexual Beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2022. Vol. 37, no. 5-6, pp. 2467–2486. doi:10.1177/0886260520938507

Information About the Authors

Olga A. Ananyeva, Graduate Student, Research Intern, Laboratory for Psychology of Social Inequality, HSE University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-6935, e-mail: oananyeva@hse.ru

Irina S. Prusova, PhD in Psychology, Head of Laboratory for Psychology of Social Inequality, HSE University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-2408, e-mail: iprusova@hse.ru

Sofia A. Zakharova, Research Intern, Laboratory for Psychology of Social Inequality, HSE University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5439-5250, e-mail: s.zakharova9600@gmail.com



Total: 41
Previous month: 0
Current month: 41


Total: 23
Previous month: 0
Current month: 23