Interpersonal conflict between a child and a parent as a ground for restricting parental rights

 
Audio is AI-generated
27

Abstract

Context and relevance. The Family Code of the Russian Federation establishes parents have the preferential right to the upbringing and education of their children; parental rights may not be exercised in conflict with the child’s interests and lead to harm the physical and mental health of children, their moral development. Through a comparative analysis of legal norms, the author of the article concludes there are two grounds for restricting a citizen’s parental rights: the danger of leaving a child with a parent due to circumstances independent of his / her behavior and due to circumstances depending on him/her. Objective. The main purpose of the article is to formulate special provisions for processing civil cases on restricting citizen’s parental rights on such grounds as the danger of leaving a child with a parent due to an interpersonal conflict between them. Methods and materials. In the study, the author used general and special scientific methods: analytical, inductive, comparative legal, formal legal methods, methods of description, comparison and study of cases. Results and conclusions. Based on own professional activity as a judge, the author found the ground for restricting of parental rights was the danger of leaving the child with the parent due to the child’s long-term negative attitude towards the parent (interpersonal conflict between the child and the parent) and the parent’s innocent behavior in the form of improper performance of his / her duties towards the child. The author draws attention to the legally significant facts that must be verified by the court when resolving disputes of this type. Also the author suggests ways to improve the legislation in this area.

General Information

Keywords: restricting parental rights, interpersonal conflict between child and parent, parenthood, dispute about children, child, parent, proceedings

Journal rubric: Interdisciplinary Studies

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150313

Received 30.10.2024

Revised 03.12.2024

Accepted

Published

For citation: Andreyanova, M.S. (2025). Interpersonal conflict between a child and a parent as a ground for restricting parental rights. Psychology and Law, 15(3), 193–205. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150313

© Andreyanova M.S., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

 

  1. Bespalov, Yu.F.(2014). Family law liability and restrictions of family rights. Journal of Russian Law, 2(206), 45— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/2236
  2. Vorozheikin, E.M. (1970). Guilt as a subjective basis of responsibility in family law. Soviet Justice, 20,13— (In Russ.).
  3. Voronina, S.V., Kuzevanova, O.O. (2017). Features of Responsibility for Family Offenses Against Minors. Izvestiya of Altai State University, 3(95), 82—85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2017)3-14
  4. Ovcharova, R.V. (2006). Parenthood as a psychological phenomenon: A textbook. Moscow: MPSI Publ. (In Russ.).
  5. Ordinartsev, I.I. (2012). Restriction of parental rights as an institution of family law of the Russian Federation: Extended abstr. Cand. of Juridical Sci.: 12.00.03 — civil law; business law; family law; private international law. (In Russ.). URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01005019897 (viewed: 01.10.2024).
  6. Savina, O.F., Safuanov, F.S. (2024). Forensic Psychological Expert Assessment Conflict of Loyalties of the Child in Court Disputes between Parents about his Upbringing. Psychology and Law, 14(3), 39—49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2024140304
  7. Safuanov, F.S. (2024). Comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination: Textbook for universities (4th  and add. ed.). Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.).
  8. Safuanov, F.S., Savina, O.F., Morozova, M., Kalashnikova, A., Kulakov, S., Perepravina, J.O., Zabezhinskaya, I., Malinovskaya, M., Soldatova, K.M., Bodrova, O. (2022). Parent-Child Interaction: Forensic and Psychological Expert Evaluations. Psychology and Law, 12(1), 115–132. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120110
  9. Sitkova, O.Yu. (2013). Guilt as the element of family offence. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 1(90), 85— (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20375923 (viewed: 01.10.2024).
  10. Sitkova, O.Yu. (2014). Sanction in family law: protection measures and responsibility measures. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 2(97), 132— (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22014952 (viewed: 01.10.2024).
  11. Smirnovskaya, S.I. (2007). Restriction of parental rights under the family legislation of the Russian Federation: Extended abstr. Cand. of Juridical Sci.: 12.00.03 — civil law; business law; family law; private international law. (In Russ.). URL: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01003066872 (viewed: 01.10.2024).

Information About the Authors

Maria S. Andreyanova, Candidate of Science (Law), Docent, Assistant Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activity, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8220-8312, e-mail: marykam79@rambler.ru

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The article doesn’t contain any materials to be considered by an Ethical committee.

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 98
Previous month: 32
Current month: 15

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 27
Previous month: 5
Current month: 2

 Total

Whole time: 125
Previous month: 37
Current month: 17