On destructive effects in the digital environment in the publications of modern foreign psychologists

 
Audio is AI-generated
1

Abstract

Context and relevance. The article is devoted to the analysis of foreign publications from 2020-2025 on the study and provision of information security for humans and society in the context of growing cyber threats, radicalization and disinformation. Goal. To identify, based on a comparative analysis of foreign publications, trends in the broadened areas of scientific activity in the field of research on destructive influences in the digital environment. Hypothesis. The accumulated body of research should lead to the expansion of generalizations and the justification of comprehensive countermeasures that take into account modern digital trends and their impact on the lives of various groups of people. Methods and materials. The tools of a comparative approach to analyzing the results of foreign publications were used as the main research method. Results. Based on the study of the content of 67 studies published by scientists from 23 foreign countries, accents have been identified that allow us to navigate foreign approaches to the following issues: hybrid wars and the psychotechnologies used in them; the impact of negative information from the media and the Internet on people's perception, experiences and behavior; information security of employees in the workplace and psychologically sound measures. to increase it; destructive effects on employees of law enforcement agencies and law enforcement agencies; radicalization of youth under the influence of influences from social networks, as well as the influence of the digital environment on deviant and criminal behavior. Conclusions. The generalizations made on comparative analysis record the main trends, contradictions and further research prospects related to the problems of studying and countering destructive influences in the digital environment.

General Information

Keywords: aggression, security, deviance, digital vulnerability, information and psychological warfare, destructive effects and counteractions, intense stress, cybercrime, radicalization of youth; digital environment

Journal rubric: Methodological Problems of Legal Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150401

Received 20.09.2025

Revised 20.11.2025

Accepted

Published

For citation: Kokurin, A.V., Pozdnyakov, V.M. (2025). On destructive effects in the digital environment in the publications of modern foreign psychologists. Psychology and Law, 15(4), 2–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2025150401

© Kokurin A.V., Pozdnyakov V.M., 2025

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

  1. Voiskounsky, A.E. (2017). The Internet as a space of knowledge: psychological aspects of hypertext structures. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 6(4), 7— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2017060401
  2. Volkova, E.N., Volkova, I.V., Golubovskaya, A.S. (2019). A review of foreign studies on the problem of cyberbullying among adolescents and young people. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 12(2), 71— (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41139651(viewed 10.09.2025).
  3. Deineka, O.S., Dukhanina, L.N., Maksimenko, A.A. (2020). Cyberbullying and victimization: a review of foreign publications. Perspectives of Science and Education, 5(47), 273—292. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.5.19(viewed: 10.09.2025).
  4. Galyashina, E.I., Bogatyrev, K.M., Antonyan, E.A., Kokurin, A.V. (2024). Media security in the digital environment: the role of knowledgeable individuals: A monograph. Moscow: Prospekt Publ. (InRuss.).
  5. Soldatova, G.U., Rasskazova, E.I., Chigarkova, S.V. (2020). Types of cyber aggression: the experience of teenagers and young people. National Psychological Journal, 2(38), 3— (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2020.0201
  6. Ağirkan, M., Haspolat, N.K., Çelik, O. (2024). Exploring different technology addiction types in young adults: a latent profile analysis. Current Psychology, 43,27225—27238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06372-z
  7. Ansary,N.S. (2020). Cyberbullying: Concepts, theories, and correlates informing evidence-based best practices for prevention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, Article, 101343. https://doi.org/1016/j.avb.2019.101343
  8. Camerini, A.L., Marciano, L., Carrara, A., Schulz, P. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49,Article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101362
  9. Casale, S., Musicò, A., Schimmenti, A. (2021). Beyond internalizing and externalizing symptoms: The association between body disconnection and the symptoms of Internet gaming disorder. Addictive Behaviors, 123, Article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107043
  10. Chen, L., Xie, Z., Zhen, J., Dong, K. (2022). The Impact of Challenge Information Security Stress on Information Security Policy Compliance: The Mediating Roles of Emotions. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 1177—1191. https://doi.org/2147/PRBM.S359277
  11. Crilley, R., Chatterje-Doody, P.N. (2021). Government disinformation in war and conflict. Howard Tumber, Silvio Waisbord. In: The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism (pp. 242—252). Taylor & Francis.https://doi.org/4324/9781003004431-27
  12. Danyk, Y., Briggs, C. (2023). Modern Cognitive Operations and Hybrid Warfare. Journal of Strategic Security,16(1), 35— https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.16.1.2032
  13. Deppe, C. (2023). Disinformation in Cognitive Warfare, Foreign Information Manipulation and Inter-ference, And Hybrid Threats. The Defence Horizon Journal, October17. https://doi.org/5281/zenodo.10005172
  14. Devilly, G.J., Drummond, A., Sauer, J.D., Copenhaver, A., Kneer, J., Ferguson, C.J. (2023). Directional is the new null? A comment on Bushman and Anderson (2021). Psychology of Popular Media, 12(3), 364—372. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000447
  15. Di Pietro, R., Raponi, S., Caprolu, M., Cresci, S. (2021). New Dimensions of Information Warfare. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/1007/978-3-030-60618-3
  16. Edmondson, A., Bransby, D. (2022). Psychological Safety Comes of Age: Observed Themes in an Established Literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,10, 55—78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
  17. Ettinger, K., Cohen, A. (2020). Patterns of multitasking behaviours of adolescents in digital environments. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 623—645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09982-4
  18. Farshadkhah, S., Van Slyke, C., Fuller, J. (2021). Onlooker effect and affective responses in information security violation mitigation. Computers & Security,100, Article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.102082
  19. Garcia, S., Ferguson, C., Wang, J. (2022). Prosocial Video Game Content, Empathy and Cognitive Ability in a Large Sample of Youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,51, 62—73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01512-1
  20. Gorzka, R.-J., Herzberg, P., Lorei, C., Hanssen, N. (2024).Träningsmanual Avseende Resilienstrategin För Fältjägare Military Police (MP). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft
  21. Ho, S.M., Kao, D., Chiu-Huang, M.-J., Li, W., Lai, Ch.-J. (2020). Detecting Cyberbullying «Hotspots» on Twitter: A Predictive Analytics Approach. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation,32(S), Article 300906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2020.300906
  22. Horn, J.M. (2023). Accident, scandal, disaster: the media framing of corporate crime. Crime, Law and Social Change, 81,203—229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-023-10111-z
  23. Hung, T-C., Hung, T-W. (2022). How China's Cognitive Warfare Works: A Frontline Perspective of Taiwan's Anti-Disinformation Wars. Journal of Global Security Studies, 7(4), Article ogac016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogac016
  24. Jiménez, I., Moyano, M., Muelas, L.R., Trujillo, M. H. (2022). Evidence of Psychological Manipulation in the Process of Violent Radicalization: An Investigation of the 17-A Cell. Frontiers in Psychiatry,13, Article  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.789051
  25. Kaakinen, M., Sirola, A., Savolaine, I., Oksanen A. (2020). Shared Identity and Shared Information in Social Media: Development and Validation of the Identity Bubble Reinforcement Scale. Media Psychology, 23(1),25—51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1544910
  26. Karaköse, T., Yıldırım, B., Tulubas, T., Kardaş, A. (2023). A comprehensive review on emerging trends in the dynamic evolution of digital addiction and depression. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1126815
  27. Krongard, S., Tsay-Vogel, M. (2020). Online original TV series: Examining portrayals of violence in popular binge-watched programs and social reality perceptions. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(2), 155—164. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000224
  28. Lacko, D., Machackova, H., Smahel, D. (2024). Does violence in video games impact aggression and empathy? A longitudinal study of Czech adolescents to differentiate within-and between-person effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, Article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108341
  29. Liu, J., Wu, G. (2023). Procedural Fairness and Fear of Crime: Extending the Procedural Justice Theoretical Model Under the Chinese Context. Crime & Delinquency,71(4), 1264—1292. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287221150422
  30. MacDonald, A., Ratcliffe R. (2023). Cognitive Warfare: Maneuvering in the Human Dimension. Proceedings, 149(4/1). URL: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2023/april/cognitive-warfare-maneuvering-human-dimension (viewed: 10.09.2025).
  31. Maftei, A., Dănilă, O., Măirean, C. (2022). The war next-door — A pilot study on Romanian adolescents’ psychological reactions to potentially traumatic experiences generated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Frontiers in Psychology,13, Article https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051152
  32. Mariatou, (2023). Book review: Duskaeva, Lilia (ed) (2021). The Ethics of Humour in Online Slavic Media Communication. Routledge. European Journal of Humour Research, 11(4), 135—139. URL: https://europeanjournalofhumour.org/ejhr/article/view/885 (viewed: 10.09.2025).
  33. Martin, J., Whelan, C. (2023). Ransomware through the lens of state crime: Conceptualizing ransomware groups as cyber proxies, pirates, and privateers. State Crime Journal,12(1), 4—28. https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.12.1.0001
  34. Miller, S. (2023). Cognitive warfare: an ethical analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 25, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09717-7
  35. Miller-Idriss, C. (2023). Extremist Recruitment and Extremist Sentiment Normalization. The Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 5(3), 164—168. https://doi.org/21810/jicw.v5i3.5190
  36. Mitchell, C., Dorian, E. (2020). Consultation in police and public safety psychology. In:Consultation in psychology: A competency-based approach (pp. 279—299). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000153-016
  37. Odigie, I., Irenoa, K., Sawyerr-George, O. (2022). Identifying Digital Aggression in Information Dissemination on Social Media: A Network Analytical Study. Information Impact Journal of Information and Knowledge Management,13(2), 98—112. https://doi.org/10.4314/iijikm.v13i2.8
  38. Oksanen, A., Oksa, R., Savela, N., Kaakinen, M., Ellonen, N. (2020). Cyberbullying victimization at work: Social media identity bubble approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 109(4), Article https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106363
  39. Popławska, A., Szumowska, E., Kuś, J. (2021). Why Do We Need Media Multitasking? A Self-Regulatory Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12,Article https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624649
  40. Potegal, M., Li, S., Kim, M. (2025). What Dyadic Internet Street Fight Videos Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Ethological, Game Theoretic, and Sex-Differentiated Phenomenology of Human Physical Aggression. AggressiveBehavior, 51(1), Article e70017. https://doi.org/1002/ab.70017
  41. Quansah, J.E., Gagnon, J. (2023). Toward an Integrative Approach to the Study of Positive-Affect-Related Aggression. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 20(2),357—370. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231200421
  42. Sánchez-Medina, A., Galván-Sánchez, I., Fernández-Monroy, M. (2020). Applying artificial intelligence to explore sexual cyberbullying behaviour. Heliyon, 6(1), Article e03218.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03218
  43. Sheinov, V. (2021). Social Media Addiction and Personality: A Review of Research. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 18(3), 607—630.https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2021-18-3-607-630
  44. Simoes, E., Sokolov, A.N., Hahn, M., Fallgatter, A.J., Brucker, S.Y., Wallwiener, D., Pavlova, M.A. (2021). How Negative Is Negative Information. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, Article https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.742576
  45. Spears, R. (2020). Social Influence and Group Identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 367—390.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-070620-111818
  46. Stacey, P., Taylor, R., Olowosule, O., Spanaki, K. (2021). Emotional reactions and coping responses of employees to a cyber-attack: A case study. InternationalJournal of Information Management, 58, Article 102298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102298
  47. Steinfeld, N. (2022). The disinformation warfare: how users use every means possible in the political battlefield on social media. Online Information Review, 46(7), 1313—1334. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0197
  48. Stogner, J., Miller, B., Mclean, K. (2020). Police Stress, Mental Health, and Resiliency during the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 718—730.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09548-y
  49. Weisburd, D., Savona, E.U., Hasisi, B., Calderoni, F. (2020). Understanding Recruitment to Organized Crime and Terrorism. Cham: Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36639-1
  50. Workman-Stark, A. (2023). ‘Me’ versus ‘We’: exploring the personal and professional identity-threatening experiences of police officers and the factors that contribute to them. Police Practice and Research, 24(2), 147— https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2022.2119971
  51. Wright, M.F., Wachs, S. (2020). Adolescents’ Cyber Victimization: The Influence of Technologies, Gender, and Gender Stereotype Traits. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,17(4), Article https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041293
  52. Zhen, J., Xie, Z., Dong, K. (2020). Positive emotions and employees’ protection-motivated behaviours: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(5), 1466—1485. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.13169
  53. Zhen, J., Xie, Z., Dong, K., Chen, L. (2022). Impact of negative emotions on violations of information security policy and possible mitigations. Behaviour& Information Technology, 41(11), 2342—2354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1921029
  54. Zhou, Y., Deng, L. (2023). A systematic review of media multitasking in educational contexts: trends, gaps, and antecedents. InteractiveLearning Environments, 31(10), 6279—6294. https://doi.org/1080/10494820.2022.2032760

Information About the Authors

Alexey V. Kokurin, Candidate of Science (Psychology), Associate Professor, Professor of the Chair of the Scientific Bases of Extreme Psychology, Faculty of Extreme Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Associate Professor at the Department of Criminology and Criminal Executive Law, Moscow State University of Law, named after O.E. Kutafin, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-1691, e-mail: kokurin1@bk.ru

Vyacheslav M. Pozdnyakov, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor, Chair of Scientific Foundations of Extreme Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9487-4435, e-mail: pozdnyakov53@mail.ru

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 2
Previous month: 0
Current month: 2

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 1
Previous month: 0
Current month: 1

 Total

Whole time: 3
Previous month: 0
Current month: 3