Skip to Main Content

Social Psychology and Society
2014. Vol. 5, no. 1, 16–30
ISSN: 2221-1527 / 2311-7052 (online)

Modern Approaches to the Study of Prejudices in Foreign Social Psychology

660

N. Kosmodamianskiy

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper gives a review of the foreign works on the issue of prejudice that have been published in the previous five years in various international social psychology journals. The following problems seem to be of special interest to the researchers: the relationship between prejudice and other components of intergroup interactions; changes in prejudices occurring in various groups; the discovery of new factors refer- ring to prejudice; and, finally, the assessment of the effectiveness of various prejudice reduction programs.

General Information

Keywords: intergroup interaction, ingroup, outgroup, prejudice, adaptation, minorities, race, ethnos

Journal rubric: Theoretical Research

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Kosmodamianskiy N. Modern Approaches to the Study of Prejudices in Foreign Social Psychology. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2014. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–30. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Тодд Н. Психология предубеждений. Секреты шаблонов мышления, восприятия и поведения. СПб., 2003. [Todd N. Psihologija predubezhdenij. Sekrety shablonov mysh) lenija, vosprijatija i povedenija. SPb., 2003].
  2. Brauer M. Describing a group in positive terms reduces prejudice less effectively than describing it in positive and negative terms // Journ of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012. № 48 (3).
  3. Brauer M. Increasing perceived variability reduces prejudice and discrimination // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. № 47(5).
  4. Brown T.N., Akiyama M.K., White I.K., Anderson E., Epstein Jayaratne T. Differentiating Contemporary Racial Prejudice from Old)Fashioned Racial Prejudice // Race and Social Problems. 2009. № 1 (2).
  5. Butz D.A. A new threat in the air: Macroeconomic threat increases prejudice against Asian Americans // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. № 47 (1).
  6. Charles-Toussaint G.C., Crowson H.M. Prejudice against international students: the role of threat perceptions and authoritarian dispositions in U.S. students. // The Journ. of Psychology. 2010. № 144 (5).
  7. Chatard A. Performance boosts in the classroom: Stereotype endorsement and prejudice moderate stereotype lift // Journ. Of Experimental Social Psychology. 2008. № 44 (5).
  8. Columb C., Plant E.A. Revisiting the Obama Effect: Exposure to Obama reduces implic) it prejudice // Journ. оf Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. № 47 (2).
  9. Crisp R.J., Turner R.N. Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact // The American Psycholyst. 2009. № 64 (4).
  10. Croft A., Schmader T. The feedback withholding bias: Minority students do not receive critical feedback from evaluators concerned about appearing racist // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2012. № 48 (5).
  11. Das E. How terrorism news reports increase prejudice against outgroups: A terror management account // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009. № 45 (3).
  12. Dermer S.B., Smith S.D., Barto K.K. Identifying and Correctly Labeling Sexual Prejudice, Discrimination, and Oppression // Journ. of Counseling & Development. 2010. 88 (3).
  13. Devine P.G. Long)term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit)breaking intervention // Journ. оf Experimental Social Psychology. 2012. № 48. (6).
  14. Falomir-Pichastor J.M. The dark side of heterogeneous ingroup identities: National identification, perceived threat, and prejudice against immigrants // Journ of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013. № 49 (1).
  15. Gailliot M.T., Peruche B M., Plant E.A. Stereotypes and prejudice in the blood: Sucrose drinks reduce prejudice and stereotyping // Journ of Experimental Social Psychology. 2009. № 45 (1).
  16. Hehman E., Gaertner S.L. Evaluations of presidential performance: Race, preju) dice, and perceptions of Americanism // Journ of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. № 47 (2).
  17. Hutchings B., Haddock G. Look Black in anger: The role of implicit prejudice in the categorization and perceived emotional intensity of racially ambiguous faces // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2008. № 44 (5).
  18. Kaiser C.R., Pratt-Hyatt J.S. Distributing Prejudice Unequally: Do Whites Direct Their Prejudice Toward Strongly Identified Minorities // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. № 96 (2).
  19. Knowles E.D. Racial prejudice predicts opposition to Obama and his health care reform plan // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2010. № 46 (2).
  20. Lehmiller J.J. The effect of self)affirmation on sexual prejudice // Journ. of Experimen) tal Social Psychology. 2010. № 46 (2).
  21. Lennox C. Racial integration, ethnic diversity, and prejudice: empirical evidence from a study of the British National Party // Oxford Economic Papers 2012. № 64 (3).
  22. Miller S.L, Maner J.K., Becker D.V. Self)protective biases in group categorization: threat cues shape the psychological boundary between "us" and "them" // Journ. оf Perso) nality and Social Psychology. 2010. № 99 (1).
  23. Morrison K.R., Chung A.H. "White" or "European American"? Self)identifying labels influence majority group members' interethnic attitudes //Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. № 47 (1).
  24. Newheiser A.K., Tausch N. Entitativity and prejudice: Examining their relationship and the moderating effect of attitude certainty // Journ. of Experimental Social Psycho) logy. 2009. № 45 (4).
  25. Paluck E.L. Reducing Intergroup Prejudice and Conflict Using the Media: A Field Experiment in Rwanda // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009. № 96 (3).
  26. Paluck E.L. Peer pressure against prejudice: A high school field experiment examining social network change Original Research Article // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. № 47 (2).
  27. Payne B.K. Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential elec) tion // Journ. оf Experimental Social Psychology. 2010. № 46 (2).
  28. Phelan J.C., Link B.G, Dovidio J.F. Stigma and prejudice: One animal or two? // Social Science and Medicine. 2008. № 67.
  29. Phills C.E. Reducing implicit prejudice: Matching approach/avoidance strategies to contextual valence and regulatory focus // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. № 47 (5).
  30. Rocio G.R., Esther L.Z. Prejudice against Women in Male)congenial Environments: Perceptions of Gender Role Congruity in Leadership // Sex Roles. 2006. № 55.
  31. Rudman L.A. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology 2012. № 48 (1).
  32. Sassenberg K. The carry)over effect of competition: The impact of competition on prej) udice towards uninvolved outgroups // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2007. № 43 (4).
  33. Zitek E.M. The role of social norm clarity in the influenced expression of prejudice over time // Journ. of Experimental Social Psychology. 2007. № 43 (6).

Information About the Authors

Nikita Kosmodamianskiy, PhD student at the Chair of of Ethnopsychology and Psychological Problems in Multicultural Education, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, e-mail: Nik_kosmo@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 1966
Previous month: 7
Current month: 3

Downloads

Total: 660
Previous month: 1
Current month: 1