The effect of work exprrience on the social sphere professionals’ resilience

The relevance of research of social sphere professionals’ resilience in order to identify the major resources of adaptation and development of people who are affected by risk factors in their work is discussed. The determination of the working conditions influencing on the professionals’ resilience is presented. It was shown that some of struc- tural components of the professionals’ resilience with different work experience allow to state that they have specific resources which help them to support their resilience in the work with orphans during the initial period of their operation, and in the period from 2 to 5 years. The interrelations of working conditions and resilience of the profes- sionals who are working in the social sector for over 6 years are discussed. The factor "work experience" affect such components of professionals’ resilience as internal locus of control and perseverance that allows to conclude that the resilience support actions should be carried out during the first 5 years of operation. The research was conducted with the financial support from Russian Foundation for Humanities. Project “Socio-psychological factors of the formation of professional’s resilience” № 16-06-00702.

1. Abul’hanova-Slavskaja K.A. Princip sub#ekta v filosofsko-psihologicheskoj koncepcii S.L. Rubinshtejna [The principle of the subject in the philosophical-psychological con- cept of S.L. Rubinstein]. S.L. Rubinshtejn. Ocherki. Vospominanija. Materialy [S.L. Ru- binstein. Essays. Memories. Materials.]. Moscow: Nauka, 1989, pp. 10—61.
2. Vodop’janova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Sindrom vygoranija: diagnostika i profilaktika [The burnout syndrome: diagnostics and prevention]. Saint- Petersburg: Piter, 2005. 336 p.
3. Dikaja L.G., Krylova G. Ju. Social’no-psihologicheskie aspekty professional’noj adap- tacii v stressogennyh uslovijah dejatel’nosti [Socio-psychological aspects of professional adaptation in stress conditions]. In L.G. Dikaja, A.L. Zhuravlev (ed.). Psihologija adaptacii i social’naja sreda: sovremennye podhody problemy, perspektivy [Psychology adaptation and social environment: modern approaches, problems, prospects]. Moscow: Publ. PerSe, 2007, pp. 483—505.
4. Il’in E.P. Psihologija voli [Psychology will]. 2-e izd. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2009. 368 p.
5. Karandashev V.N. Metodika Shvarca dlja izuchenija cennostej lichnosti: koncepcija i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo [Schwartz technique for studying personality values: con- cept and methodological guidance]. Saint- Petersburg: Rech’, 2004. 70 p.
6. Klimov E.A. Psihologija professional’nogo samoopredelenija [Psychology of profes- sional self-determination]: ucheb. posobie dlja stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij. 4-e izd., ster Moscow: Publ. Cenr “Akademija”, 2004. 304 p.
7. Krjukova T.L. O metodologii issledovanija i adaptacii oprosnika diagnostiki sovlada- jushhego (koping) povedenija [About the research methodology and adaptation of the questionnaire diagnosis of coping (coping) behavior]. In V.A. Solov’eva (ed.). Psihologija i praktika [Psychology and practice]: Sb. nauchn. trudov. Vyp. 1. Kostroma: Publ. KGU imeni N.A. Nekrasova, 2001, pp. 70—82.
8. Laktionova A.I. Strukturno-urovnevaya organizaciya zhiznesposobnosti cheloveka: metasistemnyj podhod [Structural-level organization resilience: a metasystem approach]. Lichnost’ professionala v sovremennom mire [Personality of a professional in the modern world]. In L.G. Dikaya, A.L. ZHuravlyov (ed.). Moscow: Publ. “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2013. pp. 109-126.
9. Leont’ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestojkosti [The test of hardiness]. Moscow: Smysl, 2006. 64 p.
10. Lotareva T.Ju. Sub#ektnost’ v strukture zhiznesposobnosti professionalov social’noj sfery  [Subjectivity  in  the  structure  of  social  sphere  professionals’  resilience].  In Z.I. Rjabikinoj, V.V. Znakova. (ed.). Lichnost’ i bytie: sub#ektnyj podhod (k 80-letiju so dnja rozhdenija A.V. Brushlinskogo): materialy VI Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (s inostran- nym uchastiem) [Personality and life: the subjective approach (to the 80 anniversary from the birthday of A.V. Brushlinsky): Proceedings of the VI All-Russia. scientific-practical. conf. (with foreign participation). Moscow; Krasnodar: Kubanskij gos. un-t, 2013, pp. 162—164.
11. Maljarchuk N.N. Puti profilaktiki i preodolenija sindroma professional’nogo vygo- ranija [Ways of preventing and overcoming professional burnout syndrome]. Aktual’nye problemy professional’nogo razvitija pedagogov v sisteme professional’nogo obrazovanija: teorija i praktika. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. [Actual problems of professional development of teachers in vocational education: theory and prac- tice. Proceedings of All-Russian scientific-practical conference]. Tjumen’: Publ. Tjumen- skogo gos. un-ta, 2005, pp. 76—81.
12. Mahnach A.V. Zhiznesposobnost’ cheloveka i sem’i: social’no-psihologicheskaja par- adigm [Resilience of person and family: social-psychological paradigm]. Moscow: Publ. “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. 459 p.
13. Mahnach A.V. Sociokul’turnyj jekologicheskij podhod v issledovanii zhiznesposob- nosti cheloveka i sem’I [Socio-cultural ecological approach to the study of resilience and family]. Social’nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal’nem Vostoke [Social and human Sciences in the far East], 2014, no. 3 (43), pp. 67—75.
14. Mahnach A.V., Prihozhan A.M., Tolstyh N.N. Psihologicheskaja diagnostika kandi- datov v zameshhajushhie roditeli: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Psychological diagnosis of candidates in adoptive parents: a practical guide]. Moscow: Publ. “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2013. 219 p.
15. Orel V.E. Issledovanie professional’noj deformacii lichnosti na urovne predstavlenij o professii [A study of professional deformation of the individual-level perceptions of the profession]. Aktual’nye problemy estestvennyh i gumanitarnyh nauk: Psihologija: Tezisy ju- bilejnoj konferencii. [Actual problems of natural and humanitarian Sciences: Psychology: Abstracts of the anniversary conference]. Jaroslavl’, 1995, pp. 43—46.
16. Prihozhan A.M., Tolstyh N.N. Psihologija sirotstva [Psychology of orphanhood]. 2-e izd. Saint- Petersburg: Piter, 2005. 628 p.
17. Problemnost’ v professional’noj dejatel’nosti: teorija i metody psihologicheskogo analiza [Problematic professional activities: theory and methods of psychological analy- sis]. In L.G. Dikaja (ed.). Moscow: Publ. “Institut psihologii RAN”, 1999. 358 p.
18. Psihologicheskie issledovanija nravstvennosti [Psychological study of morality]. In A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Jurevich (ed.). Moscow: Publ. “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2013. 413 p.
19. Fetiskin N.P., Kozlov V.V., Manujlov G.M. Social’no-psihologicheskaja diagnostika razvitija lichnosti i malyh grupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality develop- ment and small group]. Moscow: Publ. Instituta psihoterapii, 2005. 490 p.
20. Shvarcer R., Erusalem M., Romek V.G. Russkaja versija shkaly obshhej samojeffek- tivnosti R. Shvarcera i M. Erusalema [Russian version of the General self-efficacy scale by R. Schwarzer and M. erusalem]. Inostrannaja psihologija [ Foreign psychology], 1996, no. 7, pp. 71—77.
21. Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (ed.). Encyclopedia of human behav- ior. New York: Academic Press, 1994. Vol. 4, pp. 71—81.
22. Barth R.E., Christopher L., Sharon L.C., Mimi V.Ch., Nancy S.D. Child welfare work- er characteristics and job satisfaction: A national study. Social Work. 2008. Vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 199—209.
23. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives.  Developmental Psychology, 1986.  Vol.  22 (6), pp.  723—742. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
24. Collins S. Social workers, resilience, positive emotions and optimism. Practice: Social Work in Action, 2008. Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 255—269.
25. Getz L. Trauma-informed social work education. Social Work Today, 2013. Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 18.
26. Grant L., Kinman G. Enhancing wellbeing in social work students: building resilience in the next generation. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 2012. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 605—621. doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.590931
27. Irizarry S. Reclaiming stolen identities: resilience and social justice in mid-life. Social Work in Mental Health, 2008. Vol. 7 (1—3), pp. 226—240.
28. Kinman G., Grant L. Exploring stress resilience in trainee social workers: The role of emotional and social competencies. British Journal of Social Work. 2011. Vol. 41, pp. 261— 275. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2015.1087996.
29. Leiter M.P., Harvie P., Frizzell C. The correspondence of patient satisfaction and nurse burnout. Social Science & Medicine, 1998. Vol. 47, pp. 1611—1617. doi: 10.1016/ S0277-9536(98)00207-X
30. Masten A.S., Tellegen A. Resilience in developmental psychopathology: Contri- butions. Development and Psychopathology, 2012. Vol. 24, pp. 345—361. doi:10.1017/ S095457941200003X
31. Morrison T. Emotional intelligence, emotion and social work: context, characteristics complications and contribution. British Journal of Social Work, 2007. Vol. 37, pp. 245— 263. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl016
32. Rotter J.B. Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a vari- able. American Psychologist, 1990. Vol. 45 (4), pp. 489—493.
33. Zimet G.D., Dahlem N.W., Zimet S.G., Farley G.K. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1988. Vol. 52, pp. 30—41.