Consolidation of the social capital among different generational cohorts: organizational and subcultural facets

566

Abstract

The aim of this article is to consider the consolidation of social capital in two Russian state organizations under the context of different generational cohorts, namely, Baby Boomers, Generation X and Y, and the features of their organizational behavior. Consolidation of social capital is based on the integrated semantic area that could include the estimation of organizational culture, employees’ commitment to company goals and values as well as strong organizational identification. Extensively, consolidation of social capital is determined by organizational, generational and subcultural peculiarities of staff. Altogether, 250 employees participated in this study and filled in three questionnaires to estimate organizational culture, commitment and four dimensions of identification. The data collected in two sample groups (90 and 160 people) in St. Petersburg and Petrozavodsk respectively demonstrated the significant differences among generational cohorts both in the organization and between them. The most hardships in the consolidation of social capital undergo generation X whose formative years had been within Perestroika span and strong social changes in Russia. All that is reflected at their level of organizational identification and contradictions while perceiving current and preferred organizational cultures.

General Information

Keywords: consolidation of organizational social capital, identification, commitment, organizational culture, generational cohorts, subcultural differences

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2019100210

Funding. The work was supported by a grant from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 19-013-00560 “Methodology and socio- psychological research methods of social capital of an organization”.

For citation: Volkova N.V., Chiker V.A., Pochebut L.G. Consolidation of the social capital among different generational cohorts: organizational and subcultural facets. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2019. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 127–145. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2019100210. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Artjuhina L.V. Zhiznennye i professional’nye cennosti pokolenij — osnova korporativnoj kul’tury kompanii v uslovijah krizisov i konkurencii [Life and professional values generations — the basis of corporate culture in the conditions of crisis and competition]. Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovanija [Modern Humanities research], 2015, no. 5, pp. 179—183. (In Russ.).
  2. Burmistrova O.N. Organizacionnaja identifikacija i ocenka sotrudnikami jeffektivnosti dejatel’nosti rukovoditelja. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk [Organizational identification and evaluation by employees the operational efficiency of a supervisor. PhD (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 2010.183p.
  3. Verna V.V. Prakticheskie aspekty upravlenija personalom s uchetom polozhenij teorii pokolenij [Practical aspects of personnel management taking into account the provisions of the theory of generations]. Materialy V mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Sovremennye tehnologii upravlenija personalom» (Simferopol’, 27— 28 sentjabrja 2018 g) [Proceedings of the Fifth International conference “Contemporary approaches of human resource management”]. Simferopol’: Izdatel’stvo «Tipografija «Arial» 2018,pp. 38—43.
  4. Volkova N.V., Chiker V.A. Adaptacija personala v rossijskih organizacijah: razlichie professional’noj motivacii i urovnja samomonitoringa predstavitelej treh pokolenij (na materiale kompanij g. Sankt-Peterburga) [On-boarding in Russian organizations: Career motivation and self-monitoring differences across three generations (case study of organizations in Saint-Petersburg)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14: Psihologicheskie nauki [Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psychology], 2015, no. 4, pp. 21—38. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  5. Volkova N.V., Chiker V.A. Osobennosti kar’ernoj motivacii v kontekste teorii pokolenij: rezul’taty jempiricheskogo issledovanija [Features of Career Choices through the Generation Theory: The Results of Empirical Research]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Serija 8: Management [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Seriya 8: Management], 2016, no. 4, pp. 79—105. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  6. Glotov M.B. Pokolenie kak kategorija sociologii [Generation as a category in sociology]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija [Sociological studies], 2004, no. 10, pp. 42—48. (In Russ.).
  7. Dominyak V.I. Organizacionnaja lojal’nost’: model’ realizacii ozhidanij rabotnika otsvoej organizacii. Diss. kand. psikhol. nauk [Organizational commitment: the model of employee expectation from the organization. PhD (Psychology) diss]. St. Petersburg. 2006. 281 p.
  8. Kon I.S. Rebenok i obshhestvo [The child and the society]. Moscow: Akademija, 2003. 336p.
  9. Cameron K.S., Quinn R.E. Diagnostika i izmenenie organizacionnoj kul’tury [Diagnosing and changing organizational culture]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publishing, 2001. 311 p.
  10. Lizovskaja V.V. Cennostnye i sociokul’turnye aspekty vosprijatija cenovyh i motivacionnyh stimulov v razreze teorii pokolenij [Valuable and sociocultural aspects to perceive price and motivational incentives in the context of the generational theory]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Molodezhnaja politika Rossii v kontekste global’nyh mirovyh peremen» (Sankt-Peterburg, 22—24 nojabrja 2018 g.) [Proceedings of the International scientific conference “Youth policy in Russia under the context of global changes”]. SPb: SPbGUPTD, 2018, pp. 223—226.
  11. Parygin B.D. Social’naya psihologiya. Problemy metodologii, istorii i teorii [Social psychology. Problems of methodology, history and theory]. SPb: IGUP. 1999. 592 p.
  12. Pishchik V.I. Generations: Socio-Psychological Analysis of Mentality. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2011. no. 2, pp. 80—88. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  13. Pishchik V.I., Koroleva N.V. Situational analysis of conflict interaction of employees belonging to generations X and Y. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2018. Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 78—89. doi:10.17759/sps.2018090106. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  14. Postnikova M.I. Psihologija otnoshenij mezhdu pokolenijami v sovremennoj Rossii [Psychology of intergenerational relations in modern Russia]. Saint-Petersburg: Russian State Pedagogical University, 2011, 44 p.
  15. Pochebut L.G., Chiker V.A., Volkova N.V. Social’no-psihologicheskaja model’ kognitivnogo social’nogo kapitala organizacii: koncepcija i aspekty issledovanija [Conceptual framework of cognitive social capital in organizations from a social psychology perspective]. Organizacionnaja psihologija [Organizational psychology], 2018. Vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 47—71. (In Russ., abstr. In Engl.). URL: https://orgpsyjournal.hse.ru/ en/2018-8-2/221052223.html (Accessed: 05.05.2019).
  16. Pochebut L.G., Svencickij A.L., Mararica O.V., Kazanceva T.V., Kuznecova I.V. Social’nyj capital lichnosti [Social capital of individuality]. Moscow: Infra-M, 2014, 250 p.
  17. Radaev V.V. Millenialy na fone predshestvuyushchih pokolenij: Empiricheskij analiz [Millennials compared to previous generations: an empirical study]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2018, no. 3, pp. 15—33. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  18. Snizhenie bezraboticy ne pomoglo Karelii podnjat’sja so «dna» rejtinga regionov RF [Elektronnyi resurs] [Decreasing of the unemployment rate has not allowed Karelia to rise from the lowest rate among other Russian regions]. «Vesti Karelija» [Vesti of Karelia]. 18 marta 2019g. URL: https://vestikarelii.ru/news/snizhenie-bezrabotitsy-ne-pomoglo-karelii-podnjatsja-so-dna-rejtinga-regionov-rf/ (accessed 20.03.2019).
  19. Starceva A.A. Sravnitel’nyj analiz cennostej raznyh pokolenij (H, Y, Z) I ih aktualizacija v upravlenii personalom [Comparative analysis of the values of different generations (X, Y, Z) and their actualization in human resource management]. Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnyh nauchno-prakticheskih konferencij po problemam social’noj psihologii, upravlenija personalom, menedzhmenta i marketinga (Moskva, 30 nojabrja 2017 g.) [Proceedings of international conferences in social psychology, human resource management and marketing]. Reutov: OOOSVIVT, 2018, pp. 158—166.
  20. Tregubenko I.A. Psihologicheskaja diagnostika istoricheskoj pamjati [Psychological Diagnostics of the Historical Memory]. Nauchnye Trudy [Scholarly works], 2011, no. 19, pp. 106—121.
  21. Fedotova V.A. Values and Attitudes towards Innovation among Different Generations of Russian People. Sotsial’naia psikhologiia i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2016. Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 82—92. doi:10.17759/sps.2016070206. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
  22. Chernikov B.V. Differenciacija trudovyh cennostej sredi pokolenij sovremennyh rabotnikov [The differences in work values among generations of modern workers]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal], 2014, no. 385, pp. 153—158. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
  23. Shamis E. Teorija pokolenij. Neobyknovennyj Iks [Generational theory. Exceptional X]. Moscow: Un-t Sinergija: Shkola Biznesa. 2017. 138 p.
  24. Shamis E., Antipov A. Teorija pokolenij [The theory of generation]. Marketing. Menedzhment [Marketing. Management]. 2007, no. 6. pp. 42-46.
  25. Kreiner G.E., Ashforth B.E. Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1—27.
  26. Lyons S.T., Kuron L.K.J. Generational differences in the workplace: A review of evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, no. 35, pp. 139—157.
  27. Lub X.D., Ba P.M., Blomme R.J., Schalk R. Why do generational differences in psychological contracts exist? In E. Parry (Ed.). Generational diversity at work: New research perspectives. Oxon: Routledge, 2015, pp. 37—51.
  28. 28.               Marcus J., Leiter M.P. Generational Differences: Effects of Job and Organizational Context. Age Diversity in the Workplace. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017, pp. 65—94.
  29. Mowday R.R., Steers R.M. and Porter L.W. The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1979. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 224—247.
  30. Porter L.W., Steers R.M., Mowday R.T., BoulianP.V. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974. Vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 603—609.
  31. Strauss W., Howe N. Generations: the history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: Quill William Morrow, 1991.
  32. Srauss W., Howe N. Millennials Rising: The next great generation (vintage original). New York, 2009.
  33. Volkova N., Chiker V. On-boarding in Russian organization: differences of cognitive and social attitudes across three generations. 5th Annual Conference on Cognitive and Behavioral Psychology (GBR, 2016, Singapur), pp. 18—24.

Information About the Authors

Natalia V. Volkova, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Chair of Management, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-4393, e-mail: nv.volkova@hse.ru

Vera A. Chiker, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Chair of Social Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7444-6898, e-mail: vchiker@yandex.ru

Ludmila G. Pochebut, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the Chair of Social Psychology,, Saint Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-1442, e-mail: Ludmila.pochebut@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 1331
Previous month: 15
Current month: 18

Downloads

Total: 566
Previous month: 4
Current month: 5