Gender Differences in Attribution of Guilt to the Participants of Typical and Atypical Marital Violence Scenarios

 
Audio is AI-generated
607

Abstract

Objectives. Analysis of gender differences in attribution of guilt to the aggressor and the victim of spousal violence, depending on the victim’ and the aggressor’ gender. Background. Studies of spousal aggression show that a man’s aggression towards a woman is perceived as typical aggression, attribution of guilt to the victim-wife is directly related to the faith in a just world and the aggressor-husband is attributed more guilt than the aggressor-wife. The connection of the attribution of guilt to the victim-husband with faith in a just world and the correlation between the attribution of guilt to the victim-husband and the attribution of guilt to the victim-wife, depending on the gender of the respondents, has not been sufficiently studied. Study design. We evaluated 1) correlation of attribution of guilt to participants in a typical and atypical situation of violence through the sample as a whole and separately for men and women, and 2) differences in the level of attribution of guilt to participants in their own and opposite gender group using the method of variance analysis. Participants. 1,157 people, including 679 women, aged 18 to 66. Measurements. The questionnaire included a survey form «Faith in a just world» (Dalbert C.) and a vignette describing the situation of marital violence in different-sex couples, the gender of the victim varied. Results. The attribution of guilt to the victim-wife is directly related to faith in a just world only among women; the connection of the victim-wife’s guilt with faith in a just world is reversed among men. Much guilt for a representative of its gender group is only shown when assessing the typical victim and aggressor. Conclusions. The results suggest that attribution of guilt to the victim and gender favoritism are only shown in case of the possibility of identification with the victim’s position.

General Information

Keywords: belief in a just world, gender favoritism, marital violence, attribution of guilt to the victim, attribution of guilt to the aggressor

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

OpenAlex citations: 2

OpenAlex topics: Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse, Intimate Partner and Family Violence, Social and Intergroup Psychology

Information about the work in OpenAlex

Number of citations: 2

Topics

Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

This cluster of papers focuses on the phenomenon of maternal filicide and infanticide, exploring topics such as the characteristics of perpetrators, risk factors including mental illness and denial of pregnancy, gender differences, and strategies for prevention. The research also delves into the epidemiology of child homicide, particularly in the context of homicide-suicide events.

Number of works: 46453  |  Total number of citations: 200054

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Intimate Partner and Family Violence

This cluster of papers focuses on the prevalence, health consequences, risk factors, and interventions related to intimate partner violence. It covers topics such as mental and physical health effects, gender-based violence, HIV infection, adolescent dating violence, and the impact of child exposure to domestic violence.

Number of works: 103633  |  Total number of citations: 1436463

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Social and Intergroup Psychology

This cluster of papers explores intergroup relations, social identity theories, implicit biases, stereotype threat, prejudice reduction, power dynamics, system justification, morality and justice, attitude change, and group dynamics in various social contexts.

Number of works: 70772  |  Total number of citations: 2735950

Topic detailsв OpenAlex

Work details in OpenAlex

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110304

Published

For citation: Ulybina, E.V., Abbasova, S.E. (2020). Gender Differences in Attribution of Guilt to the Participants of Typical and Atypical Marital Violence Scenarios. Social Psychology and Society, 11(3), 51–69. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110304

© Ulybina E.V., Abbasova S.E., 2020

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

References

1. Gorshkova I.D., Shurygina I.I. Nasilie nad zhenami v rossiiskikh sem’yakh [Violence against

Information About the Authors

Elena V. Ulybina, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the Department of General Psychology, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, Lecturer at the Faculty of Practical Psychology at the Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-9006, e-mail: evulbn@gmail.com

Sara E. Abbasova, PhD Student, Chair of Psychology, Department of General Psychology, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1252-9986, e-mail: sara.abbasova09@gmail.com

Metrics

 Web Views

Whole time: 1368
Previous month: 22
Current month: 0

 PDF Downloads

Whole time: 607
Previous month: 10
Current month: 0

 Total

Whole time: 1975
Previous month: 32
Current month: 0