Socio-Economic Predictors of Prejudice: Psychological Perspective

366

Abstract

Objective. To analyze and summarize the results obtained in various social sciences regarding the emergence and spread of prejudice. Background. Prejudice is a complex issue, which is represented in different spheres of social science. In psychology, researchers analyze individual or group-based factors, while in economics and sociology they investigate objective indicators of the socioeconomic development at the country-level. Today the data in the mentioned fields are not integrated. Conclusions. Previous studies showed that GDP might indicate a significant factor in reducing bias, but only in countries with low social inequality or stable economic growth. Moreover, people with lower socioeconomic status are more vulnerable to the consequences of economic and socio-political changes. Psychological factors, in particularly, the perceived inequality or intergroup threat defined additional perspective in the explanation of the relationship between objective socio-economic indicators and the level of prejudice. In addition, the ideological attitudes (e.g., system justification) also influence the perceived inequality or threat, and bias. These findings are used to define future directions for research related to integration of objective socio-economic indicators and psychological variables to analyze the nature of prejudices.

General Information

Keywords: social progress, economic growth, inequality, prejudices, threat, social groups

Journal rubric: Theoretical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120401

Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation (RSF), project number 20-18-00142.

Received: 10.07.2020

Accepted:

For citation: Prusova I.S., Agadullina E.R. Socio-Economic Predictors of Prejudice: Psychological Perspective. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2021. Vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 5–19. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2021120401. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Polterovich V. Tolerantnost’, sotrudnichestvo i ekonomicheskii rost [Tolerance, collaboration, and economic growth] // Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2017. Vol. 11, pp. 33—49. DOI:10.32609/0042-8736- 2017-11-33-49 (In Russ.).
  2. Andersen R., Fetner T. Economic inequality and intolerance: Attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies // American Journal of Political Science. 2008. Vol. 52. № 4. P. 942—958. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00352.x
  3. Ashburn-Nardo L., Knowles M.L., Monteith M.J. Black Americans’ implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment // Social Cognition. 2003. Vol. 21. № 1. P. 61—87. DOI:10.1521/soco.21.1.61.21192
  4. Bahns A.J. Threat as justification of prejudice // Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2017. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 52—74. DOI:10.1177/1368430215591042
  5. Balestra C., Boarini R., Tosetto E. What matters most to people? Evidence from the OECD better life index users’ responses // Social Indicators Research. 2018. Vol. 136. № 3. P. 907—930. DOI:10.1007/s11205-016-1538-4
  6. Becker J.C., Wagner U., Christ O. Consequences of the 2008 financial crisis for intergroup relations: The role of perceived threat and causal attributions // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2011. Vol. 14. № 6. P. 871—885. DOI:10.1177/1368430211407643
  7. Bianchi E.C. American individualism rises and falls with the economy: Cross-temporal evidence that individualism declines when the economy falters // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2016. Vol. 111. № 4. P. 567—584. DOI:10.1037/pspp000011
  8. Billiet J., Meuleman B., De Witte H. The relationship between ethnic threat and economic insecurity in times of economic crisis: Analysis of European Social Survey data // Migration Studies. 2014. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 135—161. DOI:10.1093/migration/mnu023
  9. Buffel V., van de Velde S. Comparing negative attitudes toward the unemployed across European countries in 2008 and 2016: The role of the unemployment rate and job insecurity // International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 2019. Vol. 31. № 3. P. 419—440. DOI:10.1093/ ijpor/edy015
  10. Buttrick N.R., Oishi S. The psychological consequences of income inequality // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2017. Vol. 1. № 3. DOI:10.1111/spc3.12304
  11. Butz D.A., Yogeeswaran K. A new threat in the air: Macroeconomic threat increases prejudice against Asian Americans // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2011. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 22— 27. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.014
  12. Carvacho H., Zick A., Haye A., González R., Manzi J., Kocik C., Bertl M. On the relation between social class and prejudice: The roles of education, income, and ideological attitudes // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2013. Vol. 43. № 4. P. 272—285. DOI:10.1002/ejsp.1961
  13. Caselli F., Coleman W.J. On the theory of ethnic conflict // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2013. Vol. 11. № 1. P. 161—192. DOI:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01103.x
  14. Cruces G., Perez-Truglia R., Tetaz M. Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment // Journal of Public Economics. 2013. Vol. 98. P. 100—112. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009
  15. Cuddy A.J.C., Fiske S.T., Glick P. Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2008. Vol. 40. № 7. P. 61—149. DOI:10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
  16. Davidai S., Gilovich T. What Goes Up Apparently Needn’t Come Down: Asymmetric Predictions of Ascent and Descent in Rankings // Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2015. Vol. 28. № 5. P. 491—503. DOI:10.1002/bdm.1865
  17. Davidov E., Meuleman B. Explaining attitudes towards immigration policies in European countries: The role of human values // Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2012. Vol. 38. № 5. P. 757—775. DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2012.667985
  18. Deaton A. Income, health, and well-being around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2008. Vol. 22. № 2. P. 53—72.
  19. Decelles K.A., Norton M.I. Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2016. Vol. 113. № 20. P. 1—4. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1521727113
  20. Diener E., Diener M., Diener C. Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. Vol. 69. № 5. P. 851—864. DOI:10.1037/0022- 3514.69.5.851
  21. Durante F., Fiske S.T., Kervyn N., Cuddy A.J.C., Akande A.D., Adetoun B.E., Adewuyi M.F., Tserere M.M., Ramiah A.Al., Mastor K.A., Barlow F.K., Bonn G., Tafarodi R.W., Bosak J., Cairns E., Doherty C., Capozza D., Chandran A., Chryssochoou X., … Storari C.C. Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2013. Vol. 52. № 4. P. 726—746. DOI:10.1111/bjso.12005
  22. Durante F., Tablante C.B., Fiske S.T. Poor but Warm, Rich but Cold (and Competent): Social Classes in the Stereotype Content Model // Journal of Social Issues. 2017. Vol. 73. № 1. P. 138— 157. DOI:10.1111/josi.12208
  23. Engler S., Weisstanner D. The threat of social decline: income inequality and radical right support. Journal of European Public Policy. 2020. DOI:10.1080/13501763.2020.1733636
  24. Evans M.D.R., Kelley J. Prejudice Against Immigrants Symptomizes a Larger Syndrome, Is Strongly Diminished by Socioeconomic Development, and the UK Is Not an Outlier: Insights From the WVS, EVS, and EQLS Surveys // Frontiers in Sociology. 2019. Vol. 4. P. 1—21. DOI:10.3389/ fsoc.2019.00012
  25. Ezcurra R., Palacios D. Terrorism and spatial disparities: Does interregional inequality matter? // European Journal of Political Economy. 2016. Vol. 42. P. 60—74. DOI:10.1016/j. ejpoleco.2016.01.004
  26. Falk A., Kuhn A., Zweimüller J. Unemployment and Right-wing Extremist Crime // Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 2011. Vol. 113. P. 260—285. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9442.2011.01648.x
  27. Fiske S.T., Cuddy A.J.C., Glick P., Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002. Vol. 82. № 6. P. 878—902. DOI:10.4324/9781315187280
  28. Fiske S.T., Moya M., Russell A.M., Bearns C. The secret handshake: Trust in cross-class encounters // Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction. 2012. P. 234—251.
  29. Fridberg T., Ploug N. Public attitudes to Unemployment in different European Welfare regimes // Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. 2000. P. 334—351.
  30. Fritsche I., Jugert P. The consequences of economic threat for motivated social cognition and action // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 31—36. DOI:10.1016/j. copsyc.2017.07.027
  31. Gimpelson V., Treisman D. Misperceiving Inequality // Economics and Politics. 2017. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 27—54. DOI:10.1111/ecpo.12103
  32. Gordils J., Sommet N., Elliot A.J., Jamieson J.P. Racial Income Inequality, Perceptions of Competition, and Negative Interracial Outcomes // Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020. Vol. 11. № 1. P. 74—87. DOI:10.1177/1948550619837003
  33. Gonthier F. Parallel publics? Support for income redistribution in times of economic crisis // European Journal of Political Research. 2017. Vol. 56. № 1. P. 92—114. DOI:10.1111/1475- 6765.12168
  34. Gründler K., Köllner S. Determinants of governmental redistribution: Income distribution, development levels, and the role of perceptions // Journal of Comparative Economics. 2017. Vol. 45. № 4. DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2016.10.007
  35. Hainmueller J., Hiscox M.J. Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe // International Organizationю. 2007. Vol. 61. № 2. P. 399—442. DOI:10.1017/ S0020818307070142
  36. Harris A.S., Findley M.G., Nielson D.L., Noyes K.L. The Economic Roots of Anti-immigrant Prejudice in the Global South: Evidence from South Africa // Political Research Quarterly. 2018. Vol. 71. № 1. P. 228—241. DOI:10.1177/1065912917734062
  37. Harvey S.P., Bourhis R.Y. Discrimination between the rich and the poor under contrasting conditions of wealth stratification // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2013. Vol. 43. P. 351— 366. DOI:10.1111/jasp.12041
  38. Hauser O.P., Norton M.I. (Mis)perceptions of inequality // Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 18. P. 21—25. DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.024
  39. Hello E., Scheepers P., Gijsberts M. Education and ethnic prejudice in Europe: Explanations for cross-national variances in the educational effect on ethnic prejudice // Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2002. Vol. 46. № 1. P. 5—24. DOI:10.1080/00313830120115589
  40. Hodson G., MacInnis C.C., Busseri M.A. Bowing and kicking: Rediscovering the fundamental link between generalized authoritarianism and generalized prejudice // Personality and Individual Differences. 2017. Vol. 104. P. 243—251. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.018
  41. Horwitz S.R., Dovidio J.F. The rich-love them or hate them? Divergent implicit and explicit attitudes toward the wealthy // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2017. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 3—31. DOI:10.1177/1368430215596075
  42. Howell R.T., Howell C.J. The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-analysis // Psychological Bulletin. 2008. Vol. 134. № 4. P. 536—560. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.536
  43. Inglehart R. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
  44. Jetten J., Mols F., Postmes T. Relative deprivation and relative wealth enhances anti-immigrant sentiments: The vcurve re-examined // PLoS ONE. 2015. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0139156
  45. Johnston D.W., Lordan G. Racial prejudice and labour market penalties during economic downturns // European Economic Review. 2016. Vol. 84. P. 57—75. DOI:10.1016/j. euroecorev.2015.07.011
  46. Jost J.T. A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2019. Vol. 58. № 2. P. 263—314. DOI:10.1111/bjso.12297
  47. Jost J.T., Banaji M.R. The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness // British journal of social psychology. 1994. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 1—27. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
  48. Jost J.T., Banaji M.R., Nosek B.A. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo // Political psychology. 2004. Vol. 25. № 6. P. 881—919. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
  49. Kessler A.E., Freeman G.P. Public Opinion in the EU on Immigration from Outside the Community // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2005. Vol. 43. № 4. P. 825—850. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2005.00598.x
  50. Kraus M.W., Piff P.K., Mendoza-Denton R., Rheinschmidt M.L., Keltner D. Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor // Psychological Review. 2012. Vol. 119. № 3. P. 546. DOI:10.1037/a0028756
  51. Krys K., Capaldi C.A., Zelenski J.M., Park J., Nader M., Kocimska-Zych A., Kwiatkowska A., Michalski P., Uchida Y. Family well-being is valued more than personal well-being: A four-country study // Current Psychology. 2019. P. 1—12. DOI:10.1007/s12144-019-00249-2
  52. Kunovich R.M. Social structural position and prejudice: An exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes // Social Science Research. 2004. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 20—44. DOI:10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00037-1
  53. Kuppens T., Spears R., Manstead A.S.R., Spruyt B., Easterbrook M.J. Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: Negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018. Vol. 76. P. 1—19. DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.001
  54. Li W., Yang Y., Wu J., Kou Y. Testing the Status-Legitimacy Hypothesis in China: Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status Divergently Predict System Justification // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2020. Vol. 19. DOI:10.1177/0146167219893997
  55. Manstead A.S.R. The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behavior // British Journal of Social Psychology. 2018. Vol. 57. № 2. P. 267—291. DOI:10.1111/bjso.12251
  56. Meeusen C., Kern A. The relation between societal factors and different forms of prejudice: A cross-national approach on target-specific and generalized prejudice // Social Science Research. 2016. Vol. 55. P. 1—15. DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.009
  57. Mikucka M., Sarracino F., Dubrow J.K. When Does Economic Growth Improve Life Satisfaction? Multilevel Analysis of the Roles of Social Trust and Income Inequality in 46 Countries, 1981—2012 // World Development. 2017. Vol. 93. P. 447—459. DOI:10.1016/j. worlddev.2017.01.002
  58. Newheiser A.K., Dunham Y., Merrill A., Hoosain L., Olson K.R. Preference for high status predicts implicit outgroup bias among children from low-status groups // Developmental Psychology. 2014. Vol. 50. № 526. P. 1081. DOI:10.1037/a0035054
  59. Nishi A., Shirado H., Rand D.G., Christakis N.A. Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks // Nature. 2015. Vol. 526. № 7573. P. 426—429. DOI:10.1038/nature15392
  60. Norton M.I., Ariely D. American’s desire for less wealth inequality does not depend on how you ask them // Judgment and Decision Making. 2013. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 393—394.
  61. Oishi S., Kesebir S., Diener E. Income inequality and happiness // Psychological science. 2011. Vol. 22. № 9. P. 1095—1100. DOI:10.1177/0956797611417262
  62. Parrillo V.N., Donoghue C. The national social distance study: Ten years later // Sociological Forum. 2013. Vol. 28. № 3. P. 597—614. DOI:10.1111/socf.12039
  63. Pickett K.E., Wilkinson R.G. Recalibrating Rambotti: Disentangling concepts of poverty and inequality // Social Science and Medicine. 2015. Vol. 139. P. 132—134. DOI:10.1016/j. socscimed.2015.07.005
  64. Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes // Journal of personality and social psychology. 1994. Vol. 67. № 4. P. 741. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
  65. Reynolds K.J., Turner J.C. Individuality and the prejudiced personality // European Review of Social Psychology. 2006. Vol. 17. P. 233—270. DOI:10.1080/10463280601050880
  66. Riek B.M., Mania E.W., Gaertner S.L. Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta- Analytic Review // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2006. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 336—353. DOI:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4
  67. Rudman L.A., Feinberg J., Fairchild K. Minority members’ implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status // Social Cognition. 2002. Vol. 20. № 4. P. 294—320. DOI:10.1521/ soco.20.4.294.19908
  68. Sacchi S., Castano E., Brauer M. Perceiving one’s nation: Entitativity, agency and security in the international arena // International Journal of Psychology. 2009. Vol. 44. № 5. P. 321—332. DOI:10.1080/00207590802236233
  69. Sánchez-Rodríguez A., Willis G.B., Rodríguez-Bailón R. Economic and social distance: Perceived income inequality negatively predicts an interdependent self-construal // International Journal of Psychology. 2019. Vol. 54. № 1. P. 117—125. DOI:10.1002/ijop.12437
  70. Schiefer D. Cultural Values and Group-Related Attitudes: A Comparison of Individuals With and Without Migration Background Across 24 Countries // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2013. Vol. 44. № 2. P. 245—262. DOI:10.1177/0022022112444898
  71. Schröder M. Is Income Inequality Related to Tolerance for Inequality? // Social Justice Research. 2017. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 23—47. DOI:10.1007/s11211-016-0276-8
  72. Schwarzenthal M., Schachner M.K., van de Vijver F.J.R., Juang L.P. Equal but different: Effects of equality/inclusion and cultural pluralism on intergroup outcomes in multiethnic classrooms // Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. 2018. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 260—271. DOI:10.1037/ cdp0000173
  73. Sibley C.G., Duckitt J. Personality and prejudice: a meta-analysis and theoretical review // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2008. Vol. 12. № 1954. P. 248—279. DOI:10.1177/1088868308319226
  74. Social Progress Index. 2019 [Electronic resource]. URL: // (Accessed 18.06.2020).
  75. Sorokowski P., Groyecka A., Kowal M., Sorokowska A., Bialek M., Lebuda I., … Karwowski M. Can Information about Pandemics Increase Negative Attitudes toward Foreign Groups? A Case of COVID-19 Outbreak // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. № 12. P. 4912. DOI:10.3390/su1212491
  76. Stephan W.G., Renfro C.L., Esses V.M., Stephan C.W., Martin T. The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2005. Vol. 29. № 1. P. 1—19. DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011
  77. Stephan C.W., Stephan W.G. The measurement of racial and ethnic identity // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2000. Vol. 24. № 5. P. 541—552. DOI:10.1016/s0147- 1767(00)00016-x
  78. Stephan W.G., Ybarra O., Rios Morrison K. Intergroup threat theory // Handbook of prejudice. 2015. P. 255—278.
  79. Stephany F. Who are Your Joneses? Socio-Specific Income Inequality and Trust // Social Indicators Research. 2017. Vol. 134. № 3. P. 877—898. DOI:10.1007/s11205-016-1460-9
  80. Strabac Z., Listhaug O. Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries // Social Science Research. 2008. Vol. 37. № 1. P. 268-286. DOI:10.1016/j. ssresearch.2007.02.004
  81. Toorn J., Jost J.T., Kay A.C., Tyler T.R., Willer R., Wilmuth C. A Sense of Powerlessness Fosters System Justification: Implications for the Legitimation of Authority, Hierarchy and Government // Political Psychology. 2015. Vol. 36. № 1. P. 93-110. DOI:10.1111/pops.12183
  82. van Oorschot W. Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states // Journal of European Social Policy. 2006. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 23— 42. DOI:10.1177/0958928706059829
  83. Vogt Isaksen J. The impact of the financial crisis on European attitudes toward immigration // Comparative Migration Studies. 2019. Vol. 24. № 7. DOI:10.1186/s40878-019-0127-5h
  84. Wilkinson R.G., Pickett K.E. The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2017. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 11—24. DOI:10.1002/ ejsp.2275
  85. Yamshchikova T.N., Skobliakova I.V., Zhuravleva T.A., Lukyanchikova T.L., Semenova E.M. Theory and Reality of Social Inequality // Growth Poles of the Global Economy: Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives. 2020. P. 1177—1186.
  86. Zagefka H., Nigbur D., Gonzalez R., Tip L. Why does ingroup essentialism increase prejudice against minority members? // International Journal of Psychology. 2013. Vol. 48. № 1. P. 60—68. DOI:10.1080/00207594.2012.729841
  87. Zárate M.A., Garcia B., Garza A.A., Hitlan R.T. Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as dual predictors of prejudice // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004. Vol. 40. № 1. P. 99—105. DOI:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00067-2

Information About the Authors

Irina S. Prusova, PhD in Psychology, Head of Laboratory for Psychology of Social Inequality, HSE University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9298-2408, e-mail: iprusova@hse.ru

Elena R. Agadullina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1505-1412, e-mail: eagadullina@hse.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 797
Previous month: 22
Current month: 12

Downloads

Total: 366
Previous month: 5
Current month: 5