Strategic Approach to Measuring Digitalization of Human Resource Management Systems: Example of Russian Companies

Objective. Development and empirical approbation of a strategic approach for evaluating digitalization of human resource management systems (HRM).
Background. The electronic HRM (e-HRM) system has reached a transformational level of development, attracting increased attention from researchers and practitioners. However, the concept of e-HRM is still in its early stage of development. This paper contributes to the discussion about operationalizing this phenomenon by proposing an original e-HRM scale based on stakeholder theory and the Harvard strategic model of HRM. Study design. The paper investigated a model of strategic approach to measuring digitalization of HRM, namely how stakeholders' interests are related to e-HRM processes and outcomes. The proposed scales' reliability and validity were tested using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, while hierarchical regression analysis was used to check the presence and nature of the relationship.
Participants. The study used a random sample of respondents from 449 companies in Russia from 16 industries located in cities with a population of more than 800 thousand people and having more than 50 employees.
Measurements. The authors' scales include e-HRM, stakeholder interests, and e-HRM results.
Results The research introduces systematic approach for evaluating the processes related to digital transformation of HRM in Russian companies, which allows assessing the results of e-HRM from the strategic perspective. The proposed scales demonstrate a high level of validity and reliability. The research showed that strategic perspective to e-HRM, being based on interests of stakeholders, affect both e-HRM (β = 0,379) and e-HRM results (β = 0,455).
Conclusions. The strategic approach based on stakeholder theory and the Harvard HRM model has proven to be an effective methodology for assessing e-HRM: the higher the degree of orientation of the company's HRM department's activities towards stakeholder goals, the higher the level and effectiveness of digitalization. The evaluation methodology includes a 5-factor model for analyzing e-HRM according to the following criteria: 1. the degree of implementation of digitalization in the implementation of modern HRM programs and practices; 2. the efficiency of the organization of HRM digitalization processes; 3. the practical value of the implementation of digitalization processes in relation to the achievement of key HRM objectives in the company.

1. Bordunos A.K., Kosheleva S.V. Evolyutsiya strategicheskogo podkhoda k upravleniyu chelovecheskimi resursami s pozitsii sistem organizatsii truda [Evolution of strategic human resource management through the lens of High Performance Work Systems]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Menedzhment = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, 2016, no. 3, pp. 30–53. (In Russ.).
2. Kolosnitsyna M., Finkel'shtein G. HR v tsifrovuyu epokhu [Elektronnyi resurs] [HR in the digital age]. HRTimes, 2016. Vol. 30, no. 5. URL: https://www.ecopsy.ru/insights/hr-v-tsifrovuyu-epokhu/?sphrase_id=760496 (Accessed 01.08.2023). (In Russ.).
3. Alvesson M. The triumph of emptiness: Consumption, higher education, and work organization. OUP Oxford, 2013. 243 p.
4. Beer M., Boselie P., Brewster C. Back to the future: Implications for the field of HRM of the multistakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago // Human Resource Management. 2015. Vol. 54. № 3. P. 427–438.
5. Bondarouk T.V., Ruël H.J.M. Electronic Human Resource Management: challenges in the digital era // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2009. Vol. 20. № 3. P. 505–514.
6. Bondarouk T., Brewster C. Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research // The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2016. Vol. 27. № 21. P. 2652–2671.
7. Bondarouk T., Parry E., Furtmueller E. Electronic HRM: four decades of research on adoption and consequences // The International Journal of human resource management. 2017. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 98–131.
8. Dixit R. HRM to e-HRM: Concept, application & applicability // IITM Journal of Information Technology. 2015. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 78–88.
9. Hicks R., Tingley D. Causal mediation analysis // The Stata Journal. 2011. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 605–619.
10. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives // Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 1–55.
11. Huselid M.A., Becker B.E. The strategic impact of high performance work systems // Academy of Management annual meeting. 1995. P. 1–27.
12. Huselid M., Minbaeva D. Big data and human resource management // Sage handbook of human resource management. 2019. P. 494–507.
13. Jackson S.E., Schuler R.S., Jiang K. An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management // Academy of Management Annals. 2014. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 1–56.
14. Kovach K.A., Hughes A.A., Fagan P., Maggitti P.G. Administrative and strategic advantages of HRIS // Employment Relations Today. 2002. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 43–48.
15. Lawler III E.E. High-Involvement Management. Participative Strategies for Improving Organizational Performance. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, 1986. 252 p.
16. Lepak D.P., Snell S.A. Virtual HR: Strategic human resource management in the 21st century // Human resource management review. 1998. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 215–234.
17. Posthuma R.A. et al. A high performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research // Journal of management. 2013. Vol. 39. № 5. P. 1184–1220.
18. Ruël H., Bondarouk T., Looise J.K. E-HRM: Innovation or irritation. An explorative empirical study in five large companies on web-based HRM // Management revue. 2004. P. 364–380.
19. Ulrich D., Dulebohn J.H. Are we there yet? What's next for HR? // Human Resource Management Review. 2015. Vol. 25. № 2. P. 188–204.