Features of Subjective Well-Being and Coping Strategies in Women During Periods of Soft and Hard Social Transitivity

19

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by large-scale, overlapping, multidirectional changes throughout the world over the past few years, which create a situation of social transitivity with heterogeneous periods. The concept of social transitivity is analyzed, in which heterogeneous periods are distinguished. The aim of the work is an empirical study of the specifics of subjective well-being, psychological defenses and coping strategies in women in situations of hard and soft social transitivity. The study involved 318 women (N=318), living in different cities of Russia aged from 26 to 55 years. The study was conducted in 2022 in two stages — during periods of soft and hard transitivity. The results obtained prove the importance for subjective well-being, psychological defenses and the choice of coping strategies for experiencing a person’s current situation as a crisis. The specificity of the links between subjective well-being and psychological defenses and coping strategies has been revealed both for groups with different experiences of the current situation and for different periods of transitivity. It is shown that rigid transitivity erases almost all differences between those who assess the current situation of social transitivity as a crisis and those who for whom it is not. It has been established that the greatest contribution to the maintenance of subjective well-being is made by the psychological defense “denial”, and these connections have their own specifics in two groups for different periods of transitivity. Few links were found between coping strategies and subjective well-being, among them positive links between the coping strategy “positive reformulation and personal growth” and subjective well-being in a group of women who assess the situation as a crisis, and the number of these links decreases in a situation of rigid transitivity. The results obtained contribute to the development of the problem of the psychological well-being of an individual in a situation of social and personal transitivity.

General Information

Keywords: subjective well-being, coping strategies, social transitivity, personal transitivity, rigid transitivity, fluid transitivity

Journal rubric: Empirical and Experimental Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2023.406

Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant project no. 19-18-00516 “Transitive and virtual spaces — commonality and differences”.

Received: 29.07.2023

Accepted:

For citation: Orestova V.R. Features of Subjective Well-Being and Coping Strategies in Women During Periods of Soft and Hard Social Transitivity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 2023. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 523–536. DOI: 10.21638/spbu16.2023.406. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

Coroiu, A., Moran, C., Campbell, T., Geller, A. C. (2020). Barriers and facilitators of adherence to social distancing recommendations during COVID-19 among a large international sample of adults. PLoS ONE, 15 (10), e0239795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239795

Jovančeviс, A., Miliсeviс, N. (2020) Optimism-pessimism, conspiracy theories and general trust as factors contributing to COVID-19 related behavior — A cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110216

Kuftyak, E. V. (2018). Studying psychological defenses using the “Questionnaire of Defense Styles”: Relationship with coping and psychological well-being (on the example of adolescence). Methodological and Applied Issues of Medical (Clinical) Psychology: On the 90th anniversary of Yu. F. Polyakov: (pp. 117–127). Moscow, Sam poligrafist Publ. (In Russian)

Lazarević, L., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., Knežević, G. (2020). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles and conspiracy mentality. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cgeuv

Leontiev, D. A., Rasskazova, E. I., Taranenko, O. V., Kosheleva, N. V. (2022). Changes in subjective well-being during the pandemic: The role of coping strategies and pandemic response. In: T. L. Kryukova, M. V. Saporovskaya, S. A. Khazova (eds). Psikhologiia Stressa i Sovladaiushchego Povedeniia: Ustoichivost’ i Izmenchivost’ Otnoshenii, Lichnosti, Gruppy v Epokhu Neopredelennosti: materialy VI Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Kostroma, 22–24 sentiabria 2022 g.) (pp. 9–13). Kostroma, Kostroma State University Press. (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2020). Personal boundaries of space and time in the situation of deprivation due to COVID-19. Voprosy Psikhologii, 66 (4), 104–114. (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2021). A new methodology for studying the transitivity of the life space of a changing personality. Novye Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 1 (2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2021_01_02_02 (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D. (2022). Dynamics of psychological well-being in the situation of transitivity and pandemic. Novye Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 2 (2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2022_02_02_05 (In Russian)

Martsinkovskaya, T. D., Karpuk, V. A. (2023). Adaptation of the immersion questionnaire in virtual space: An approach to the problem. Novye Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 3 (1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.51217/npsyresearch_2023_03_01_05 (In Russian)

Pilyugina, E. R., Suleymanov, R. F. (2020). Method for measuring psychological defense. Eksperimental’naia Psikhologiia, 13 (2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130213 (In Russian)

Poleva, N. S. (2022). Psychology of transitivity: Types of space and psychological chronotope. Vestnik RGGU. Ser. Psikhologiia. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie, 4, 14–29. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-4-14-29 (In Russian)

Rasskazova, E. I., Gordeeva, T. O., Osin, E. N. (2013). Coping strategies in the structure of activity and self-regulation: Psychometric characteristics and application possibilities of the COPE questionnaire. Psikhologiia. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 10 (1), 82–118. (In Russian)

Rasskazova, E. I., Leontiev, D. A., Lebedeva, A. A. (2020). Pandemic as a challenge to subjective well-being: Anxiety and coping. Konsul’tativnaia Psikhologiia i Psikhoterapiia, 28 (2), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280205 (In Russian)

Shamionov, R. M., Beskova, T. V. (2018). Method for diagnosing subjective well-being of an individual. Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniia, 11 (60), 8. Available at: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/download/277/561/565 (accessed: 10.09.2023). (In Russian)

Zirenko, M., Kornilova, T., Qiuqi, Z., Izmailova, A. (2021). Personality regulation of decisions on physical distancing: Cross-cultural comparison (Russia, Azerbaijan, China). Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110418

Information About the Authors

Vasilisa R. Orestova, Doctor of Psychology, Head of the Department of Personality Psychology / Faculty of Psychology / L.S. Vygotsky IP, Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), Moscow, Russia, e-mail: v.r.orestova@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 54
Previous month: 14
Current month: 13

Downloads

Total: 19
Previous month: 6
Current month: 5