Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology
2026. Vol. 16, no. 2, 226–249
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2026.203
ISSN: 2658-3607 / 2658-6010 (online)
Adaptation and modification of the Russian version of the Job Constructing Questionnaire (JCQ) by G. Slamp and D. Vella-Broderick
Abstract
Modern transformations in the labor sphere, including the rise of hybrid forms of employment and the high variability of working conditions, necessitate the development and validation of tools for assessing employees' proactive behavior. One such tool is the Job Crafting Questionnaire (JCQ), developed by G. Slemp and D. Vella-Brodrick. The aim of the present study was to adapt the Russian version of the JCQ and to modify it by introducing a new domain—a subscale of environmental crafting—followed by an examination of its factor structure, reliability, and construct validity.
Two samples participated in the study: 800 respondents in 2023 and 300 respondents (modified version) in 2024. The methodology included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA), reliability assessment (Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ω), and item discrimination analysis (GRM). The results supported the original three-factor structure of the JCQ (task, cognitive, and relational crafting), and a four-factor structure when the new subscale of environmental crafting was added. The total explained variance in the four-factor model was 62%, with α values > 0,85 and ω values > 0,88. Most items demonstrated high discrimination (a > 1.5). Construct validity was confirmed through positive correlations with the previously validated Russian version of the Job Crafting Scale (JCS) by M. Tims, A. B. Bakker, and D. Derks (r = 0,40–0,65) and the PAS scale (r ≈ .45). These findings confirm the reliability and validity of the Russian JCQ, including its modified version.
General Information
Keywords: job crafting, task crafting, cognitive crafting, relational crafting, environmental crafting, proactive work behavior
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2026.203
Funding. The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 22-18-00452 (Extension) “Psychosocial design of the work environment as a factor of employees’ subjective well-being and the organization’s innovative potential”.
Received 15.05.2025
Accepted
Published
For citation: Yakukhnova, A.S., Mararitsa, L.V., Gurieva, S.D. (2026). Adaptation and modification of the Russian version of the Job Constructing Questionnaire (JCQ) by G. Slamp and D. Vella-Broderick. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 16(2), 226–249. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2026.203
References
Asrori, A. (2024). Examining the influence of organizational change management strategies on employee resistance and adaptation. Management Studies and Business Journal (PRODUCTIVITY), 1 (3), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.62207/x65khh38
Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory, 2nd ed. College Park, ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
Bekhter, A. A. (2022). Primary adaptation and validation of R. Schwarzer’s Proactive Attitudes Scale in a non-clinical sample: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Eksperimental’naia psikhologiia, 15 (2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150215 (In Russian)
Bratus’, B. S. (1988). Personal meaning and the structure of motivation. In: B. S. Bratus’ (ed.). Anormal’naia lichnost’ (pp. 33–76). Moscow, Moscow University Press. (In Russian)
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long (eds). Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). New York, Sage.
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X. 55.1.68
Embretson, S. E., Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605269
Hu L., Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed. New York, Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2015.44023
Leont’ev, A. N. (1975). Activity as the basis for the formation and development of the psyche. In: A. N. Leont’ev (ed.). Deiatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ (pp. 87–135). Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russian)
Li C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48 (3), 936–949. https://doi. org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Li, Yu. (2023). Research on psychological adaptation strategies of employees in enterprise change management. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 12 (1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v12i1.13621
Manichev, S. A., Lepekhin, N. N., Ilyina, O. N. (2022). Russian version of the core Self-Evaluation Scale: Psychometric validation and prospects for use. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 12 (3), 285–308. (In Russian)
Manichev, S. A., Miletich, M. P., Lepekhin, N. N., Ilyina, O. N., Pogrebitskaya, V. E. (2023). Russian version of the Job Crafting Scale: Psychometric evaluation, validation, and prospects for use. Organizatsionnaia psikhologiia, 13 (1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-1-92-116
Noviyanti, I., Asmalah, L., Fitria, J. R. (2025). The influence of motivation and physical work environment on employee performance at CV. Putra Abadi Jaya, Tangerang Regency. International Journal of Management and Economic, 4 (1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.56127/ijme.v4i1.1862
Nassledov, A. D. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics 20 i AMOS: Professional’nyi statisticheskii analiz dannykh. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ. (In Russian)
Petrovskii, V. A. (2010). Subject activity of personality. In: V. A. Petrovskii (ed.). Lichnost’ v psikhologii: Paradigma sub”ektnosti (pp. 115–158). Moscow, Smysl Publ. (In Russian)
Rahman, R. S., Nurdiansyah, H., Sidharta, I., Purana, R. D., Hendiky, F. (2024). Increasing employee performance through physical work environment and work motivation. Journal of Economics, Management, and Entrepreneurship, 2 (1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.55208/jeme.v2i1.158
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika, 34 (1), 1–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372160
Schwarzer, R. (2000). Proactive attitude: A general disposition toward goal-setting and goal pursuit. Psychologische Beitrage, 42, 191–204.
Slemp, G. R., Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The job crafting questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3 (2), 126–146. Available at: https://www.internationaljournalofwellbeing.org/index.php/ijow/article/view/217 (accessed: 10.05.2025).
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80 (1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011
Yu, C.-Yu. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes, Dr. Sci. Thesis. Los Angeles.
Yumkina, E. A., Gurieva, S. D., Postanina, A. V. (2024). Adaptation of the Russian version of the Job Crafting Questionnaire: Psychometric analysis. In: V. V. Kozlov, A. V. Karpov, V. A. Mazilov, V. F. Petrenko (eds).
Metodologiia sovremennoi psikhologii, iss. 22 (pp. 334–340). Moscow; Yaroslavl, Yaroslavl State University Press; Laboratory of Clinical Research and Integrative Intelligence Systems of the RAS Press; International Academy of Psychological Sciences Press. (In Russian)
Zhang, F., Parker, S. K. (2019). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104 (5), 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000372
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Web Views
Whole time: 1
Previous month: 0
Current month: 1
PDF Downloads
Whole time: 0
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0
Total
Whole time: 1
Previous month: 0
Current month: 1