Models of knowledge management in Russian institutions: social and psychological analysis



The paper presents socio-psychological analysis of five knowledge management models used in Russian institutions: knowledge management in projects, virtual expert groups, competence centers, knowledge management via organization development and open innovations. Special attention is given to the consequences of transition to network-based knowledge management.

General Information

Keywords: social psychology of knowledge, knowledge management psychology; crowdsourcing; organization learning; group dynamics; social influence

Publication rubric: Psychology in social management, human resources, organizational development

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Nestik T.A. Models of knowledge management in Russian institutions: social and psychological analysis [Elektronnyi resurs]. Socio-economic and psychological problems of management,


  1. Zhuravlev A.L., Nestik T.A. Psikhologiya upravleniya sovmestnoy deyatel'nost'yu: Novye napravleniya issledovaniy. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2010.
  2. Nestik T.A. Psikhologicheskie aspekty upravleniya znaniyami // Innovatsionnoe razvitie. Ekonomika, intellektual'nye resursy, upravlenie znaniyami / pod red. B.Z. Mil'nera. M.: INFRA-M, 2009. S. 590-611.
  3. Almirall E., Casadesus–Masanell R. Open versus closed innovation: a model of discovery and divergence // Academy of Management Review. 2010. V. 35, Issue 1. R. 27–47.
  4. Brabham D.C. Motivations for Participation in a Crowdsourcing Application to Improve Public Engagement in Transit Planning // Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2012. Vol. 40. Issue 3. P. 307-328.
  5. Gast A., Zanini M. The social side of strategy // McKinsey Quarterly. 2012. Issue 2. P. 82-93.
  6. Haichao Zh, Dahui L., Wenhua H. Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests // International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2011. Vol. 15. Issue 4. P. 57-88.
  7. Hansen M.T., Nohria N., Tierney T. What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? // Harvard Business Review. 1999. Vol. 77, Iss. 2. P. 106-117.
  8. Howe J. The Rise of Crowdsourcing // Wired, 2006. Issue 14.06, June.
  9. Lever- aging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition / Leimeister J. M., Huber M., Bretschneider U., Krcmar H. // Journal of management Information Systems. 2009. Vol. 26, Iss. 1. P. 197-224.
  10. How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect / Lorenz J., Rauhut H., Schweitzer F., Helbing D. // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011. Vol. 108. Iss. 22. P. 9020-9025.
  11. Roman D. Crowdsourcing and the Question of ExpertiseCommunications of the ACM. 2009. Vol. 52. No. 12. P. 14.
  12. Intuitive Biases in Choice versus Estimation: Implications for the Wisdom of Crowds / Simmons J.P.., Nelson L.D., Galak J., Frederick Sh. // Journal of Consumer Research. 2011. Vol. 38. Iss. 1. P. 1-15.

Information About the Authors

Timofey A. Nestik, Doctor of Psychology, professor, Head of the Laboratory of Social and Economic Psychology, Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Senior Researcher, Department of Personality Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID:, e-mail:



Total: 17
Previous month: 1
Current month: 0


Total: 4
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0