Previous issue (2020. Vol. 25, no. 5)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Self-Perception of Giftedness in Adolescents Selected for Gifted Education Programmes 164
Volkova E.N.
Doctor of Psychology, Leading Researcher, Institute of Psychology, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9667-4752
e-mail: envolkova@yandex.ru Miklyaeva A.V.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor Department of Human Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8389-2275
e-mail: a.miklyaeva@gmail.com Kosheleva A.N.
PhD in Psychology, Assistant Professor, Institute of Psychology, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2497-6414
e-mail: alkosh@inbox.ru Khoroshikh V.V.
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology of Professional Activity, The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St.Petersburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7116-0042
e-mail: VKhoroshikh@gmail.com
Specialized support for gifted children and adolescents should be based on the specifics of their social situation of development which is largely determined by the fact of identifying a person as gifted. ‘Labeling giftedness’ has a significant impact on the system of interpersonal relationships and self-attitude of children and adolescents. However, there is no holistic construct of the phenomenon of ‘self-perception of giftedness’ in psychology today, therefore, we defined the theoretical and empirical development of this construct as the goal of our study. The paper presents the results of this study which describes the construct of ‘self-perception of giftedness’ basing on the survey of 422 adolescents aged 15—17 years who had been selected for gifted education programmes. Using factor analysis we identify the main dimensions of the construct typical for late adolescence: giftedness resources/risks assessment; environment of risks and resources manifestation (internal/external); localization of conditions for high achievement (internal — external).Basing on the analysis of the significance of differences, we outline the perspectives of using the construct to reveal gender specifics of self-perception of giftedness in older adolescents enrolled in gifted education programmes.
The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-013-00729.
-
Volkova E.N., Miklyaeva A.V., Khoroshikh V.V.Kriterii
identifikatsii detskoi i podrostkovoi odarennosti kak osnovanie dlya
formirovaniya vyborok pri provedenii psikhologicheskikh issledovanii [Criteria
of identification of children’s and adolescent giftedness as a basis for
forming samples when planning psychological research].Teoreticheskaya i
eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Theoretical and experimental
psychology, 2019, Vol.12, no.1, pp.69—78.(In Russ.).
-
Vygotskiш L.S.Pedologiнa podrostka [Teenager’s
Pedology].In Pavlova M.K.(ed.), Psihologicheskie teorii podrostkovogo
vozrasta: hrestomatija = Psychological Theories of Adolescence: A Reading
Book.Moscow: ANO PJeB, 2008, pp.284—324.(In Russ.).
-
Meshkova N.V.Zarubezhnye issledovaniya odarennosti:
sotsial’no-psikhologicheskii aspekt [Elektronnyi resurs] [Research of academic
giftedness in foreign studies: socio-psychological aspect].Sovremennaya
zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology,
2015.Vol.4, no 1, pp.26—44.URL: https://psyjournals.ru/
jmfp/2015/n1/76175.shtml (In Russ.).
-
Pantileev S.R.Samootnoshenie kak
emotsional’no-otsenochnaya Sistema [Self-attitude as an emotional-evaluation
system].Moscow: Publ.MGU, 1991.100 p.(In Russ.).
-
Sardzhveladze N.I.Struktura samootnosheniya lichnosti i
sotsiogennye potrebnosti [The structure of the individual’s self-attitude and
sociogenic needs].In Sardzhveladze N.I., Chkhartishvili Sh.N.(eds.),
Problemy formirovaniya sotsiogennykh potrebnostei = Problems of
sociogenic needs forming.Tbilisi: «Mitsniereba», 1974, pp.103—107.(In
Russ.).
-
Stolin V.V.Samosoznanie lichnosti [Self-identity].Moscow:
Publ.MGU, 1983.288p.(In Russ.).
-
Shcheblanova E.I., Petrova S.O.Obshchaya i akademicheskaya
ya-kontseptsii odarennykh uchashchikhsya srednei shkoly [General and academic
self-concepts of gifted secondary school students].Psikhologicheskie
Issledovaniya = Psychological studies, 2014.Vol.7, no.38, p.7.URL:
http://psystudy.ru (Accessed: 20.02.2020).(In Russ.).
-
Yalom I.Ekzistentsial’naya psikhoterapiya [Existential
psychotherapy].Moscow: Publ Klass, 2019.576 p.(In Russ.).
-
Assouline S., Colangelo N., Ihrig D., Forstadt
L.Аttributional Choices for Academic Success and Failure by Intellectually
Gifted Students.Gifted Child Quarterly, 2006.Vol.50, no.4,
pp.283—294.DOI:10.1177 / 001698620605000402
-
Bain Sh.K., Bell Sh.M.Social Self-Concept, Social
Attributions, and Peer Relationships in Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Graders Who
Are Gifted Compared to High Achievers.Gifted Child Quarterly,
2004.Vol.48, no.3, рр.167—178.DOI:10.1177/001698620404800302
-
Barab S.A., Plucker J.A.Smart people or smart contexts?
Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to
knowing and learning.Educational Psychologist, 2002.Vol.37, pp.
165—182.
-
Brighton C.M.The effects of middle school teachers’
beliefs on classroom practices.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,
2003.Vol.27, no.2/3, pp. 177—206.
-
Butler J.The Psychic Life of Power.California: Stanford
University Press, 1997.230 р.
-
Coleman L., Cross T.Is being gifted a social handicap?
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1988.Vol.11, pp.41—56.
-
Comerford Boyes L., Reid I., Brain K., Wilson,
J.Accelerated learning: A literature survey.Unpublished report, Department for
Education and Skills, London, 2004.
-
Cornel D.G.Gifted children: The impact of positive
labeling on the family system. American Journal of
Orthopsychiatry, 1983.Vol.53, pp.322—335.
-
Cornell D.G., Grossberg I.N.Parent use of the term
“gifted”: Correlates with family environment and child adjustment.Journal
for the Education of the Gifted, 1989.Vol.12, pp.218—230.
-
Cross T., Colemean L., Stewart.R.The Social cognition of
gifted adolescence: An exploration of the stigma of giftedness
paradigm.Roeper Review, 1993.Vol.16, no.1, pp.37—40.
-
19. Ellen J.It’s All a Matter of Perspective: Student
Perceptions on the Impact of Being Labeled Gifted and Talented.Roeper
Review, 2009.Vol.31, pp. 217—223.DOI:10.1080/02783190903177580
-
Freeman J.Giftedness in the Long Term.Journal for the
Education of the Gifted, 2006.Vol.29, no.4, pp. 384—403.
-
Geake J.G., Gross U.M.Teachers’ negative affect toward
academically gifted students: an evolutionary psychological study.Gifted
Child Quarterly, 2008.Vol. 52, no.3, pp.217—231.
-
Hewitt D.Gifted and talented mathematics.Proceedings of
the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 2010.Vol.25,
no.3.URL: http:// www.bsrim.org.uk
-
Howard-Hamilton M., Franks B.A.Gifted adolescents:
Psychological behaviors, values, and developmental implications.Roeper
Review, 1995.Vol. 17, no.3, pp.186—191.
-
Jenkins-Friedman R., Murphy D.L.The Mary Poppins Effect:
Relationships between Gifted Students’ Self Concept and Adjustment.Roeper
Review, 1988.Vol.11, no.1, pp.26—30.
-
Juriševič M., Žerak U.Attitudes Towards Gifted Students
and Their Education in the Slovenian Context.Educational psychology from a
contemporary perspective, 2019.Vol.12, no.4,
pp.101—117.DOI:10.11621/pir.2019.0406
-
Kerr B., Colangelo N., Gaeth J.Gifted adolescents’
attitudes toward their giftedness.Gifted Child Quarterly, 1988.Vol.32,
no 2, pp.245—247.
-
Levine E., Tucker S.Emotional needs of gifted children: A
preliminary phenomenological view.The Creative Child and Adult
Quarterly, 1986.Vol.11, pp. 156—165.
-
Marsh H.W., Parker J.W.Determinants of student
self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even
if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 1984.Vol.47, no.1, pp.213—231.DOI:10.1037/0022-
3514.47.1.213
-
Marsh H.W., Morin A.J., Parker P.D.Physical self-concept
changes in a selective sport high school: a longitudinal cohort-sequence
analysis of the big-fish-little-pond effect.Journal of Sport and Exercise
Psychology, 2015.Vol.37, no.2, pp.150—163.DOI:10.1123/jsep.2014-0224
-
O’Connor J.Is It Good to be Gifted? The Social
Construction of the Gifted Child.Сhildren and society,
2012.Vol.26, pp.293—303.DOI:10.1111/j.1099- 0860.2010.00341.x
-
Patchett R.F., Gauthier Y.Parent and teacher perceptions
of giftedness and a program for the gifted.BC Journal of Special Education
(British Columbia), 1991.Vol.15, no.1, pp.25—38.
-
Salchegge S.Selective school systems and academic
self-concept: How explicit and implicit school-level tracking relate to the
big-fish-little-pond effect across cultures.Journal of Educational
Psychology, 2016.Vol.108, no.3, pp.405—423.DOI:10.1037/edu0000063
-
Striley K.The Stigma of Excellence and the Dialectic of
(Perceived) Superiority and Inferiority: Exploring Intellectually Gifted
Adolescents’ Experiences of Stigma.Communication Studies, 2014.Vol.65,
issue 2, pp.139—153.DOI:10.1080/10510974.2013.851726
-
Swiatek M.А., Dorr R.M.Revision of the social coping
questionnaire: Replication and extension of previous findings.Journal of
Secondary Gifted Education, 1998.Vol.10, issue 1, p.252.
-
Tannenbaum A.J.Gifted Children.New York:
MacMillan.1983.466 p.
|
|
