Previous issue (2020. Vol. 11, no. 3)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
|
|
Trust as a factor of psychological security in interethnic interaction 792
Dontsov A.I.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Department of social psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University , Moscow, Russia
e-mail: kcp@psy.msu.ru Perelygina E.B.
Doctor of Psychology, Dean of Social Psychology department of Liberal Arts, Head of Social Psychology chair, University for Humanities (LAU), Ekaterinburg, Russia
e-mail: elena_sutkina@mail.ru Zotova O.Y.
Doctor of Psychology, Professor at General and Applied Psychology chair of Social Psychology department, Liberal Arts University-University for Humanities (Yekaterinburg), Ekaterinburg, Russia
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-6317
e-mail: oiambusheva@mail.ru Mostikov S.V.
Post-Graduate Student, Liberal Arts University-University for Humanities (LAU), Ekaterinburg, Russia
e-mail: smostikov@ya.ru
The direction and role of trust as a factor of psychological security in social interac- tion is the subject of research attention of Russian and foreign scientists. Confidence appears as a generalized socio-psychological phenomenon, conditioned by the history and experience of previous interpersonal and socio-institutional interactions, features of national cultures and traditions, moral norms and values, attitudes and stereotypes. In the interethnic interaction, a large share in the content of trust relations acquires the experience of interethnic relations, ethno-cultural competence, the lack of intragroup and inter-group aggression, the unity of vectors and perceptions of the security of indi- vidual. To identify indicators of a sense of security, a study was conducted comparing respondents’ perception (N = 514) of themselves in danger, in safety and in an actual state. Factorial-analytical processing allowed to reveal the structure of the personal safety of respondents, where as the significant are five factors. The leading factor (explained variance of 25.653%) is trust, which gives grounds to consider the possibil- ity of providing trust as one of the main indicators of psychological security. Studies conducted in polyethnic groups of students also showed that the phenomenon of trust is an important factor in their psychological security.
-
Akkieva S.I. Doverie kak faktor sohraneniya
mezhnacional’noj stabil’nosti na Severnom Kavkaze v usloviyah globalizacii
[Trust as a factor of maintaining interethnic stability in the North Caucasus
in the context of globalization]. Uspekhi sovremennoj nauki [The successes
of modern science], 2016. Vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 166—169.
-
Veraksa A.N., Rikel’ A.M. Psihologiya bezopasnosti kak
postneklassicheskoe prostranstvo simvolov [Psychology of security as a
post-nonclassical space of symbols]. Mezhdisciplinarnye issledovaniya v
psihologii bezopasnosti i ih sovremennoe sostoyanie: materialy VIII
Mezhregional’nogo simpoziuma s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Interdisciplinary
research in the psychology of security and their current state: Proceedings of
the VIII Interregional Symposium with International Participation]. In E.B.
Perelygina (ed.). Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyj universitet, 2017. pp.
28—31.
-
Gushchina T.V. Doverie kak vazhnaya storona
sovladayushchego povedeniya v kontekste mezhkul’turnoj kommunikacii [Trust as
an important aspect of coping behavior in the context of intercultural
communication]. Psihologiya obshcheniya i doveriya: teoriya i praktika: sb.
materialov Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii URAO, PI RAO, MGU (6—7 noyabrya 2014 g.)
[Psychology of communication and trust: theory and practice: a collection of
materials of the International Conference URAO, PI RAO, MSU (November 6-7,
2014)]. In T.P. Skripkina (ed.). Moscow: Universitet RAO, 2014, рр.
611—613.
-
Dontsov A.I., Zinchenko Yu.P., Zotova O.Yu., Perelygina
E.B. Psihologiya bezopasnosti [Psychology of safety]. Moscow: Yurajt, 2018. 276
р.
-
Kazydub N.N. Beskonfliktnyj diskurs: ritual’noe povedenie
ili otvetstvennyj postupok? [Conflict discourse: ritual behavior or responsible
action?] Vestnik MGLU EALI [Bulletin of MGLU EALI],
2015, no. 3(714), рр. 62—71.
-
-
Koulman Dzh. Kapital social’nyj i chelovecheskij [Capital
is social and human]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’
[Social sciences and modernity], 2001,
no. 3, pp. 121—139.
-
Kuchenkova A.V. Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v rossijskom
obshchestve [Interpersonal Confidence in Russian Society ]. Sociologicheskie
issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 2016, no. 1, pp. 26—36.
-
Magomedov M.G. Social’noe doverie v rossijskom obshchestve
[Social trust in Russian society]. Moscow: Social’no gumanitarnye znaniya,
2008. 260 p.
-
Malahov V. Kul’turnye razlichiya i politicheskie granicy v
ehpohu global’nyh migracij [Cultural differences and political boundaries in
the era of global migration]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie; Institut
filosofii RAN, 2014. 232 p.
-
Mukomel’ V.I., Ryzhova S.V. Doverie i nedoverie v
mezhnacional’nyh otnosheniyah [Confidence and distrust in interethnic
relations]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research],
2017, no. 1, pp. 37—46.
-
Pibodi D., Shmelev A.G., Andreeva M.K., Gramenickij A.E.
Psihosemanticheskij analiz stereotipov russkogo haraktera [Psychosemantic
analysis of stereotypes of the Russian character]. Voprosy psihologii
[Questions of psychology], 1993, no. 3, pp. 101—111.
-
Sasaki M., Davydenko V.A., Romashkina G.F., Voronov V.V.
Sravnitel’nyj analiz doveriya v razlichnyh stranah [Comparative analysis of
trust in various countries]. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological
research], 2013, no. 3, pp. 60—73.
-
Bar-Tal D., Kruglanski A.W. The social psychology of
knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 416 p.
-
Flick U., Foster J. Social representations. In C. Willig,
W.S. Rogers (ed.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research in
psychology. L.: Sage, 2008, pp. 195—214.
-
Kassebaum U.B. Interpersonelles Vertrauen: Entwicklung
eines Inventars zur Erfassung spezifischer Aspekte des Konstrukts [Elektronnyi
resurs]. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hamburg. Hamburg, 2004. URL
http://www.sub.uni-hamburg.de/opus/volltexte/2004/2125
(Accessed: 06.04.2018).
-
Pettigrew T.F. The ultimate attribution error: Extending
Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 1979. Vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 461—476. doi:
10.1177/014616727900500407
-
Rotter J.B. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal
trust. American Psychologist, 1971. Vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 443—452.
doi: 10.1037/h0031464
|
|
