Previous issue (2020. Vol. 11, no. 1)
Included in Web of Science СС (ESCI)
Use of various strategies of mixed methods research in organizational culture diagnosis 462
PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Chair of Social Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Differences between quantitative and qualitative methods at various levels are described. The advantages and disadvantages of these groups of methods are analyzed in relation to the process of studying the culture of the organization, it is concluded that the separate use of only one class of methods in the diagnosis of organizational culture can lead to the construction of an inadequate picture. The emergence of a strategy of “mixed methods” is quite natural phenomenon. However, the joint use of different methods in one study involves solving a number of methodological problems of their interrelation. We consider a variant of the theoretical justification that guides such studies, proposed by J. Green and her colleagues, based on which three strategies for mixing quantitative and qualitative methods in diagnosing the culture of an organization are described: triangulation, addition, and development. It is supposed that these strategies can be combined in the process of an organizational culture diagnosis in order to obtain a more complete, reliable and most relevant result.
Lipatov S.A. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya diagnostika
organizatsionnoi kul’tury: Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk. [Social psychological
diagnostics of organizational culture. Ph.D. (Psychology) diss.]. Moscow, 1999.
Lipatov S.A. Modeli i metody organizatsionnoi
diagnostiki. In Zhukov Yu.M. (ed.) Metody prakticheskoi sotsial’noi
psikhologii: Diagnostika. Konsul’tirovanie. Trening [Methods of
Practicing Social Psychology: Diagnostics. Consulting. Training].
Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2004, pp. 48—68.
Polukhina E.V., Prosyanyuk D.V. Issledovanie so
smeshannymi metodami (mixed methods research): Integratsiya kolichestvennogo i
kachestvennogo podkhodov [Mixed methods research: integration of quantitative
and qualitative approaches]. METOD: Moskovskii ezhegodnik trudov iz
obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin: Sb.nauch.tr. Vyp. 5 [METHOD: Moscow
Yearbook of works from social sciences disciplines]. Moscow: INION RAN,
2015, pp. 309—318.
Savinskaya O.B., Istomina A.G., Larkina T.Yu., Kruglova
K.D. Kontseptual’nye predstavleniya o strategiyakh «smeshivaniya metodov»
(mixed methods research): etapy razvitiya i sovremennye diskussii.
Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Conceptual ideas of mixed methods research:
stages of development and current debates]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
[Sociological Studies], 2016, no. 8, pp. 21—29.
Tolstova Yu.N., Maslennikov E.V. Kachestvennaya i
kolichestvennaya strategii: Empiricheskoe issledovanie kak izmerenie v shirokom
smysle [Qualitative and quantitative strategies. Empirical investigation as
measurement in a broad sense]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological
Studies], 2000, no. 10, pp. 101—109.
Shein E.Kh. Organizatsionnaya kul’tura i liderstvo: per. s
angl. [Organizational Culture and Leadership]. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2013.
352 p. (In Russ.).
Bryman A., Bell E. Business Research Methods. 3rd ed.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 806 p.
Cresswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. Designing and Conducting
Mixed Method Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2011. 488 p.
Di Pofi J.A. Organizational diagnostics: integrating
qualitative and quantitative methodology. Journal of Organizational Change
Management, 2002. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 156—168.
Green J.C., Caracelli V.J., Graham W.F. Towards a
conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989. Vol. 11, no. 3, pр. 255—274.
Morgan D. Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative
Methods: A Pragmatic Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014. 260 p.
Yauch C.A., Steudel H.J. Complementary use of qualitative
and quantitative cultural assessment methods. Organizational Research
Methods, 2003. Vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 465—481.