Information Support as a Tool of Social Reforms’ Correction

Objectives. To get a deeper knowledge of the informative accompaniment being a tool to get social reforms adopted. Background. Sociocultural dynamics as for the fluctuations of modernity in a new fashion pose the problems of government democratization, public control over it, being some part of the citizens commissioned. The appearance of modern informative and communicative technologies gives an opportunity to complete certain ways of social management using the new communicative formats and some types of social activity implying the transition to the subjects of the society being self-organized on the basis of jointly constructed public opinion. Methodology. A synergistic approach is used within the framework of which the society is regarded as a text constructed by a collective author on the basis of a sociocultural project it has. It made social reforms possible like some corrections of this project proposed by one of the subjects of the society being grouped. Conclusions. The informative accompaniment of the reforms is analyzed in a dual context: it is a necessary component of the process to get reforms adopted which become a part of some processes the society is being modernized as it turns out. It has led to an expansion of its interpretations when in addition to spreading of some information about the reforms and organizing some communications with a potential audience being interested in reforms’ promoting, the informative accompaniment becomes a part of some processes the society to be self-organized. In this case, it’s a feedback tool allowing different subjects to introduce some changes into proposed projects of the modernized society. The expansion of the informative accompaniment has been traced meaning its path from the tool of the customer, adapted for the solution of its goals, to the tool of the collective participant of social reforms, attracted with the perspectives of their application becoming a tool for the self-development of the society, allowing all the subjects of the society to be involved into this process.

 

1. Batalov E.Ya. Sovremennye global’nye trendy i novoe soznanie [Modern global trends and new consciousness]. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International processes], 2012. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 4—17.
2. Boltanski L., K’yapello E. Novyi dukh kapitalizma [New spirit of capitalism]. Moscow: NLO, 2011. 976 p. (In Russ.).
3. Bortnik R., Spiridonov N., Gaevskii D., Semenov M. Reforma obrazovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Education reform]. URL: https://uiamp.org.ua/cref/reforma-obrazovaniya (Accessed 09.04.2020).
4. Gavra D.P. Osnovy teorii kommunikatsii [Basics of communication theory]. Saint- Petersburg: Piter, 2011. 285 p.
5. Dzyaloshinskii I.M. Kommunikatsionnoe soprovozhdenie versus PR [Communication support versus PR?]? In Dzyaloshinskaya M.I. (ed.). Informatsionnoe soprovozhdenie sotsial’nykh proektov v sovremennom obshchestve [Information support of social projects in modern society]. Moscow: ID ATISO, 2010, pp. 164—174.
6. Dzyaloshinskaya M.I., Dzyaloshinskii I.M. Ot informatsionnogo soprovozhdeniya k informatsionnomu partnerstvu [From information support to information partnership]. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki [Questions of the theory and practice of journalism], 2015. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 349—365.
7. Devis E. Tekhnognozis: mif, magiya i mistitsizm v informatsionnuyu epokhu [Technognosis: Myth, Magic and Mysticism in the Information Age]. Ekaterinburg, Ul’tra. Kul’tura, 2008. 480 p. (In Russ.).
8. Innovatsionnaya slozhnost’ [Innovative complexity]. In Knyazeva E.N. (ed.). Saint- Petersburg: Aleteiya, 2016. 608 p.
9. Keiner S., Lind L., Toldi K., Fisk S., Berger D. Rukovodstvo fasilitatora: kak privesti gruppu k prinyatiyu sovmestnogo resheniya [Facilitator’s Guide: How to lead a group to make a joint decision]. Moscow: Publ. Dmitriya Lazareva, 2013. 344 p. (In Russ.).
10. 10.    Latur B. Peresborka sotsial’nogo: vvedenie v aktorno—setevuyu teoriyu [Rebuilding the social: an introduction to actor-network theory]. Moscow: Publ. NIU VShE, 2014. 384 p. (In Russ.).
11. 11.    Lepskii V.E. Tekhnologii upravleniya v informatsionnykh voinakh (ot klassiki k postneklassike) [Management technologies in information wars (from classics to post-non-classics)]. Moscow: «Kogito—Tsentr», 2016. 160 p.
12. Lukov Val.A. Sotsial’noe proektirovanie [Social engineering]. Moscow: Flinta: Sotsium, 2003. 240 p.
13. Lukov Val.A. Tezaurusnaya kontseptsiya sotsial’nogo proektirovaniya [Elektronnyi resurs] [Thesaurus Concept of Social Design]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. 2007, no. 3. URL: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/gumtech/ projection/articles/2007/Lukov/3/ (Accessed 09.04.2020).
14. Manoilo A.V. Gosudarstvennaya informatsionnaya politika v osobykh usloviyakh [State information policy in special conditions]. Moscow: MIFI, 2003. 388 p.
15. Mel’nikova O.T., Khoroshilov D.A. Predislovie redaktorov tematicheskogo vypuska [Preface editors of thematic edition]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2018. Vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 7—9. DOI:10.17759/sps.2018090301 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
16. Modernіzatsіinі protsesi v osvіtі ta suspіl’stvі: psikhotekhnologії suprovodu [Modernization processes in education and society: psychology of support]. In Frolov P.D. (ed.). Kіrovograd: Іmeks—LTD, 2013. 312 p.
17. Moskalev I.E. Metodologiya i metodika gosudarstvennogo upravleniya innovatsionnymi sotsial’nymi protsessami [Methodology and methods of state management of innovative social processes]. Obrazovanie i obshchestvo [Education and society], 2007, no. 5, pp. 62—69.
18. Natsіonal’na dopovіd’ pro stan і perspektivi rozvitku osvіti v Ukraїnі [National report on the state and prospects of education development in Ukraine]. In Kremen V.G. (eds.). Kiїv: Pedagogіchna dumka, 2016. 448 p.
19. Nestik T.A. Kollektivnyi obraz budushchego: sotsial’no—psikhologicheskie aspekty prognozirovaniya [The collective image of the future: social psychological aspects of prognostication]. Voprosy psikhologii [Psychology issues], 2014, no. 1, pp. 3—13.
20. Noel’-Noiman E. Obshchestvennoe mnenie: otkrytie spirali molchaniya [Public Opinion: Opening the Spiral of Silence]. Moscow: Progress-Akademiya, Ves’ Mir, 1996. 352 p. (In Russ.).
21. Pliushch A.N. Konstruiruemyi tekst identichnosti [Identity as a constructed text]. Voprosy psikhologii [Psychology issues], 2018, no. 1, pp. 28—39. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
22. Plyushch A.N. Sinergeticheskaya model’ organizatsii obshchestva [A synergetic model of society organization]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 2014, no. 10, pp. 14—22.
23. Plyushch A.N. Sotsial’no—psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy informatsionnogo vliyaniya [Socio-psychological Mechanisms of Information Influence]. Nezhin: Aspekt-Polіgraf, 2017. 244 p.
24. Reanimatsiinyi paket reform [Elektronnyi resurs] [Resuscitation reform package]. URL: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Реанімаційний_пакет_реформ (Accessed 09.04.2020).
25. Reformi v Ukraїnі: chi znayut’, chi vіryat’, chi pіdtrimuyut’ [Reforms in Ukraine: Do they know if they believe or support]. Gromads’ka dumka [Public Opinion], 2018, no. 32, pp. 2—15.
26. Rіven’ poіnformovanostі naselennya Ukraїni pro reformi, otsіnka vplivu reform na osobiste stanovishche gromadyan [Elektronnyi resurs] [Awareness of the population of Ukraine about reforms, assessment of the impact of reforms on the personal situation of citizens]. URL: http://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni-doslidzhennia/riven-poinformovanosti-naselennia-ukrainy-pro-reformy-otsinka-vplyvu-reform-na-osobyste-stanovyshche-hromadian (Accessed 09.04.2020).
27. Semenenko I.S. Politika identichnosti i identichnost’ v politike: etnonatsional’nye rakursy, evropeiskii kontekst [Identity politics and identity in politics: ethnonational perspectives, the European context]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2016, no. 4, pp. 8—28. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.04.03 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
28. Solov’ev A.I. Gosudarstvo kak proizvoditel’ politiki [The State as Manufacturer of Policy]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2016, no. 2, pp. 90— 108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.02.08 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
29. Solov’ev A.I. Prinyatie gosudarstvennykh reshenii [Government decision making]. Moscow: KNORUS, 2006. 344 p.
30. Suspіl’no—polіtichnі nastroї zhitelіv Ukraїni: cherven’ 2018 roku [Elektronnyi resurs] [Public-political mood of the inhabitants of Ukraine: June 2018]. URL: http:// www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=767&page=1&y=2018&m=6 (Accessed 09.04.2020).
31. Toshchenko Zh.T. Sotsiologiya. Obshchii kurs [Sociology. General course]. Moscow: Prometei: Yurait—M, 2001. 511 p.
32. Khabermas Yu. Filosofskii diskurs o modern [The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity]. Moscow: Ves’ mir, 2003. 416 p. (In Russ.).
33. Shishkina M.A. Pablik rileishnz v sisteme sotsial’nogo upravleniya [Public relations in the social management system]. Moscow: Pallada—media, 2002. 444 p.
34. Yanitskii O.N. Sotsial’nye izmeneniya i upravlenie [Social change and governance]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies], 2016, no. 5, pp. 134—143. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.05.11 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
35. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor—Network—Theory. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2005. 301 p.