Social Psychology and Society
2020. Vol. 11, no. 4, 151–164
doi:10.17759/sps.2020110411
ISSN: 2221-1527 / 2311-7052 (online)
Psychological Readiness for Organizational Change and its Socio-Psychological Predictors
Abstract
General Information
Keywords: readiness for organizational changes, organizational identification, identification with a unit, injective group norms, descriptive group norms
Journal rubric: Empirical Research
Article type: scientific article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2020110411
Funding. The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-013-00393.
For citation: Naumtseva E.A., Stroh W.A. Psychological Readiness for Organizational Change and its Socio-Psychological Predictors. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society, 2020. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 151–164. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2020110411. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)
References
1. Naumtseva Е.А. Analiz psikhometricheskikh svoistv russkoyazychnoi versii oprosnika D.Kholta “Gotovnost’ k organizatsionnym izmeneniyam” [Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Russian version of the D. Holt questionnaire “Readiness for organizational change”]. Organizatsionnaya psihologiya = Organizational psychology, 2016, no. 4, pp. 104—117. (In Russ.).
2. Nesmeyanova Р.К. Sub”ektivnoe predstavlenie o korporativnoi kul’ture i organizatsionnaya identifikatsiya: osobennosti vzaimosvyazi [The subjective representation of corporate culture and organizational identification: features of the relationship]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psihologiya = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology], 2017, no. 1, pp. 88— 104. (In Russ.).
3. Onuchin А.N. Perezhivanie sotsial’nykh i organizatsionnykh izmenenii [Experiencing social and organizational change]. In Stefanenko T.G (eds.). Kollektivnie perezhivaniya socialnih problem [Collective experiences of social problems]. Moscow: Smisl, 2015. 240 p. (In Russ.).
4. Sanzhaeva R.D. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy formirovaniya gotovnosti cheloveka k deyatel’nosti. Diss. dokt. psikhol. nauk. [Psychological mechanisms of the formation of human readiness for performance. Dr. Sci. (Psychology) diss.]. Novosibirsk, 1997. 354 p. (In Russ.).
5. Sidorenkov А.V., Salnikova Е.S., Stroh V.А. Identichnost’ i vklad rabotnikov v deyatel’nost’ maloi proizvodstvennoi gruppy [The identity and contribution of workers to the activities of a small production group]. Psihologiya. Zhurnal Vishei shkoli ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2019, no. 16(3), pp. 551—561. (In Russ.).
6. Faerman M.I. Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie innovatsionnoi deyatel’nosti organizatsii: metodicheskie ukazaniya [Psychological support of the organization’s innovative activity: guidelines]. Yaroslavl, 2008. 76 p. (In Russ.).
7. Armenakis A.A., Harris S.G., Mossholder K.W. Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 1993, no. 46, pp. 681—703.
8. Bartels J., Pruyn A., De Jong M., Joustra I. Multiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 173—190.
9. Borsari B., Carey K.B. Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 2001, no. 13, pp. 391—424.
10. Cialdini R. B., Kallgren C. A., Reno R. R. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in experimental social psychology, 1991, no. 24, pp. 201—234.
11. Dick van R., Wagner U., Stellmacher J., Christ O., Tissington P. To Be(long) or Not to Be(long): Social Identification in Organizational Contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 2005. Vol. 131, no. 3. pp. 189—218.
12. Drzensky F., Egold N., van Dick R. Ready for a Change? A Longitudinal Study of Antecedents, Consequences and Contingencies of Readiness for Change. Journal of Change Management, 2012. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 95—111.
13. Ellemers N. Identity, culture, and change in organizations: a social identity analysis and three illustrative cases. In Haslam S.A., van Knippenberg D., Platow M.J., Ellemers N. (eds.). Social Identity at Work: Developing Theory for Organizational Practice, 2003, no. 191—203.
14. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press, 2010. 538 p.
15. Goode C., Balzarini R., Smith H. Positive peer pressure: Priming member prototypicality can decrease undergraduate drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2014, no. 44, pp. 567.
16. Hekman D., Steensma K., Bigley G., Hereford J. Effects of Organizational and Professional Identification on the Relationship Between Administrat’rs’ Social Influence and Professional Employes’ Adoption of New Work Behavior. The Journal of applied psychology, 2009, no. 94, pp. 1325.
17. Holt D.T., Armenakis A.A., Field H.S., Harris S.G. Readiness for organizational change: the systematic development of a scale. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2007, no. 43 (2), pp. 232— 255.
18. Janssen O., Huang X. Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members’ citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management, 2008, no. 34(1), pp. 69—88.
19. Jones R.A., Jimmieson N.L., Griffiths A. The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: The mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies, 2005, no. 42 (2), pp. 361—386.
20. Lewis N. Norms and observability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2013, no. 43, pp. E97— E108.
21. Lipponen J. Organizational identifications: Antecedents and consequences of identifications in a shipyard context. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2001. 129 pp.
22. Mael F., Ashforth B.E. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1992, no. 13 (2), pp. 103—123.
23. Miscenko D., Day D. Identity and identification at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 2016, no. 6(3), pp. 215—247.
24. Olkkonen M., Lipponen J. Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group—related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006, no. 100(2), pp. 202—215.
25. Porck J., van Knippenberg D., Tarakci M, Ates N., Groenen P., de Haas M. Do Group and Organizational Identification Help or Hurt Intergroup Strategic Consensus? Journal of Management. Advance online publication, 2018, pp. 1—27.
26. Riketta M. Organizational identification: A meta—analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2005, no. 66 (2), pp. 358—384.
27. Rimal R., Real K. Understanding the Influence of Perceived Norms on Behaviors. Communication Theory, 2013, no. 13(2), pp. 184—203.
28. Schepers J., Wetzels M. A meta—analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information, Management, 2007, no. 44, pp. 90—103.
29. Stangor C., Sechrist G.B., Jost J.T. Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2001, no. 27(4), pp. 486—496.
Information About the Authors
Metrics
Views
Total: 936
Previous month: 14
Current month: 17
Downloads
Total: 773
Previous month: 13
Current month: 14