Otium post negotium?



This detailed review of the book by N.A. Khrenov “The Playful Human in Russian Culture” focuses on the most interesting moments of the book. The author equals play with leisure, reviewing the latter from two points of view: spiritual (cultural) and material (civilizational). He considers leisure a specific cultural phenomenon that has its own history and certain socio-cultural functions. The aim of leisure activity is to develop human personality, whereas leisure provides conditions for freedom. The author analyzes cultural functions of leisure using Russian nobility of 18–19th centuries as an example. He also analyzes present-day leisure and shows that modern culture turns back to archaic forms of play that are typical of culture before the Modern period N.A. Khrenov describes the processes of institutionalizing leisure values. The authors of the review not only set forth N.A. Khrenov's position, but also dispute with him.

General Information

Keywords: culture, civilization, leisure, freedom of personality

Journal rubric: Criticism and Bibliography

Article type: review

For citation: Ivanchenko G.V., Ryzhov Y.V. Otium post negotium?. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2006. Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 117–122. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

Information About the Authors

Galina V. Ivanchenko, Doctor of Philosophy, Head of the General Sociology Department, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics., Moscow, Russia

Yuri V. Ryzhov, PhD in Engineering, Associate Professor at the State Pedagogical University of Taganrog, Taganrog, Russia



Total: 4536
Previous month: 64
Current month: 32


Total: 1070
Previous month: 2
Current month: 10