Skip to Main Content

Cultural-Historical Psychology
2007. Vol. 3, no. 4, 19–31
doi:10.17759/chp.2007030403
ISSN: 1816-5435 / 2224-8935 (online)

The Phenomenon of Time Perspective across Different Cultures: Review of Researches Using ZTPI Scale

3675

A. Sircova, O.V. Mitina, J. Boyd, I.S. Davydova, P.G. Zimbardo, T.L. Nepryaho, E.A. Nikitina, N.S. Semyonova, N. Fieulaine, V.A. Yasnaya

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

One's preference for certain time orientations is influenced by many factors including culture. The aim of this research was to describe the phenomenon of time perspective in different cultures. The authors carried out re-evaluation of reliability and validity of the Russian version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) scale and compared the findings with the original scale as well as with its adapted versions (French and others). The sample consisted of 1136 people aged 14 to 81 from eighteen Russian cities and was divided into seven age groups. As a result, the five factor structure of the ZTPI was replicated on the Russian sample (reliability and validity proved to be quite high), although certain changes had been made to the test keys because of cultural differences. The five factors of the ZTPI that are similar both in Russian and French samples make it possible to carry out cross-cultural comparisons using this scale. It was also found that women have higher orientation to Past Positive and Present Fatalistic than men. People living in large cities score higher on Present Hedonistic and lower on Future that people living in small towns.

General Information

Keywords: time perspective, time orientations, Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, confirmatory factor analysis

Journal rubric: Empirical Research

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2007030403

For citation: Sircova A., Mitina O.V., Boyd J., Davydova I.S., Zimbardo P.G., Nepryaho T.L., Nikitina E.A., Semyonova N.S., Fieulaine N., Yasnaya V.A. The Phenomenon of Time Perspective across Different Cultures: Review of Researches Using ZTPI Scale. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2007. Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 19–31. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2007030403. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Bespalov B.I., Leonov S.V. Vzaimosvyaz' vosproizvedeniya vremennyh i prostranstvennyh intervalov //Psihologiya pered vyzovom budushego. Materialy nauchnoi konferencii, priurochennoi k 40letnemu yubileyu fakul'teta psihologii MGU, 23 - 24 noyabrya, 2006.
  2. Ershova R.V. Issledovanie osobennostei vremennoi perspektivy u starshih podrostkov i yunoshei // Sbornik materialov V mezhdunarodnoi nauchno prakticheskoi konferencii «Psihologiya obrazovaniya 21 veka — problemy i perspektivy». Kolomna, 2006.
  3. Levin K. Teoriya polya v social'nyh naukah. SPb., 2000.
  4. Leont'ev D.A., Mandrikova E.Yu., Osin E.N., Plotnikova A.V., Rasskazova E.I. Opyt strukturnoi diagnostiki lichnostnogo potenciala // Psihologicheskaya diagnostika.2007. № 1.
  5. Materialy dokladov XIV Mezhdunarodnoi konferencii studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchenyh «Lomonosov» / Otv.red. I.A. Aleshkovskii, P.N. Kostylev. [Elektronnyi resurs]. M., 2007.
  6. Mitina O.V. Osnovnye idei i principy strukturnogo modelirovaniya // Uchenye zapiski kafedry obshei psihologii MGU. Vyp. 2 / Pod red. B.S. Bratusya, E.E. Sokolovoi. M., 2006.
  7. Pavlova T.A. Organizaciya vremeni zhizni kak komponent struktury lichnosti studenta. Avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol.nauk. M., 1988.
  8. Syrcova A. Psihologicheskoe vremya: aprobaciya metodiki Zimbardo po vremennoi perspektive // Vestn. Mosk. unta, seriya «Psihologiya». 2005. № 1.
  9. Syrcova A., Sokolova E.V., Mitina O.V. Metodika F. Zimbardo po vremennoi perspektive // Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. 2007. № 1.
  10. Apostolidis T., Fieulaine N. Validation francaise de l'echelle de temporalite: The Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory // European Review of Applied Psychology. 2004. № 54.
  11. Apostolidis T., Fieulaine N., Simonin L., Rolland G. Cannabis use, time perspective and risk perception: Evidence of a moderating effect // Psychology and Health. 2006. № 21.
  12. Athawale R. Cultural, gender and socio-economic differences in time perspective among adolescents: Thesis for degree Magister Scientiae (Councelling psychology), Department of Psychology, University of the Free State. 2004.
  13. Boyd J.N., Zimbardo P.G. Time perspective, health, and risk taking // A. Strathman, J. Joireman (еds.). Understanding Behavior in the Context of Time. Mahwah,Erlbaum, 2005.
  14. D'Alessio М., Guarino А., Vilfredo De Pascalis V., Zimbardo Ph. Testing Zimbardo's Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI): Short Form An Italian study // Time & Society. 2003. Vol. 12. № 2/3.
  15. Diaz Moralez J.F. Estructura factorial y fiabilitad del Inventario de Perspectiva Temporal de Zimbardo //Psicothema. 2006.Vol. 18. № 3.
  16. Fieulaine N. Perspective temporelle, situations de pre carite et sante : Une approche psychosociale du temps.These de doctorat en Psychologie. Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale, Universite de Provence, 2006.
  17. Fieulaine N., Apostolidis T. Socioeconomic deprivation and psychological distress: Exploring the role of time perspective // Journal of Applied Social Psychology (in print).
  18. Gjesme T. On the concept of future-time orientation:Consideration of some functions' and measurements' implications // International Journal of Psychology. 1983. Vol. 5.
  19. Gonzales A., Zimbardo P.G. Time in Perspective //Psychology Today. 1985. 19 (3).
  20. Keough K.A., Zimbardo P.G., Boyd J.N. Who's Smoking, Drinking, and Using Drugs? Time Perspective as a Predictor of Substance Use // Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1999. 21(2).
  21. Lens W. Future time perspective: A cognitive motivational concept // Frontiers of motivational psychology /Brown D.R., Veroff J. (еds.). N.Y., 1986.
  22. Lewin K. Time Perspective and Morale // G. Watson (еd.). Civilian Morale. Boston, 1942.
  23. McGrath J., Tschan F. Temporal Matters in Social Psychology: Examining the Role of Time in the Lives of Groups and Individuals. Washington DC, 2004.
  24. Milfont T.L., Gouveia V.V. Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes // Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2006. № 26.
  25. Nurmi J. How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning // Developmental Review. 1991. № 11.
  26. Paez D., Gonzales J.L. Culture and social psychology // Psicothema. 2000. 6 (supl.).
  27. Pieterse A.M. The Relationship between Time Perspective and Career Maturity for Grade 11 and 12 Learners: Thesis for degree Magister Societatis Scientiae (Counselling Psychology), Department of Psychology, University of the Free State. 2005.
  28. Pulkkinen L., Ronka A. Personal Control over Development, Identity Formation, and Future Orientation as Components of Life Orientation: A Developmental Approach // Developmental Psychology. 1994. Vol. 30. № 2.
  29. Schmidt R.W., Lamm H., Trommsdorff G. Social class and sex as determinants of future orientation (time perspective) in adults // European Journal of Social Psychology. 1978. № 8.
  30. Strathman A., Gleicher F., Boninger D., Edwards C. The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. № 66.
  31. Zimbardo P.G., Boyd J.N. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. № 77.
  32. Zimbardo P.G., Keough K.A., Boyd J.N. Present Time Perspective as a Predictor of Risky Driving // Personality and Individual Differences. 1997. № 23.
  33. Zaleski Z. Personal future in hope and anxiety perspective // Psychology of Future Orientation / Zaleski Z. (еd.). Lublin, 1994.

Information About the Authors

Anna Sircova, Graduate Student of the Faculty of Educational Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Riga, Latvia, e-mail: anna.sircova@gmail.com

Olga V. Mitina, PhD in Psychology, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Communication Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2237-4404, e-mail: omitina@inbox.ru

John Boyd, PhD, Director of Design Research, Yahoo! Inc., USA

Irina S. Davydova, MA student, Russian Sate University for the Humanities, school psychologist, Secondary Comprehensive School No 199, Korolev, Russia, e-mail: irikuchis@mail.ru

Philip G. Zimbardo, PhD in Psychology, Professor Emeritus, Chair of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA, e-mail: zim@psych.stanford.edu

Tatyana L. Nepryaho, Head of Psychodiagnostic Laboratory at the Faculty of Psychology and Social Work, Tver State University, Tver, Russia, e-mail: himmeltan@mail.ru

Ekaterina A. Nikitina, Postgraduate Student, Center of Educational Sociology, Russian Academy of Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: NikitinaCV@mail.ru

Nadeshda S. Semyonova, Postgraduate Student at the Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: nadsem@gmail.com

Nicolas Fieulaine, PhD, Lecturer in Social Psychology, Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GRePS), Institut de Psychologie, Universite Lyon 2, Lyon, France

Vera A. Yasnaya, Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Yuridical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia

Metrics

Views

Total: 10739
Previous month: 59
Current month: 77

Downloads

Total: 3675
Previous month: 11
Current month: 19