Skip to Main Content

Cultural-Historical Psychology
2009. Vol. 5, no. 1, 66–73
ISSN: 1816-5435 / 2224-8935 (online)

Socio-Cultural-Historical Activity Theories of Development in the Age of Hyperglobalization

919

M. Cole

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper focused on two issues of ongoing concern to cultural-historical scholars that have particular bearing on issues of diversity: 1) To what extent and under what conditions is cultural diversity in performance on cognitive tasks to be construed in terms of a developmental hierarchy? 2) How do phylogenetic ("natural") and cultural-historical contributions to development relate to each other in shaping human diversity? Next I suggest new lines of research and international cooperation that may help us reach a deeper understanding of these issues.

General Information

Keywords: Cross-cultural Research, History-as-Progress, Deficit vs Difference, Social Neuroscience, Diversity

Journal rubric: Discussions and Discourses

Article type: scientific article

For citation: Cole M. Socio-Cultural-Historical Activity Theories of Development in the Age of Hyperglobalization. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2009. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 66–73. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

    1. Amodio D. M., Devin, P. G., & Harmon-Jone E. (2008). Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94(1). 2008.
    2. Ardilla A., M., & Roselli, P&Rosas P. (1989). Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: Visuospatial and memory abilities. Brain and Cognition, 11, 147—166.
    3. Castro-Caldes A. (2003).Targeting regions of interest for the study of the illiterate brain. International Journal of Psychology. 39 (1). 5—17.
    4. Cole J., & Durham (2007). Generations And Globalization: Youth, Age, And Family in the New World Economy (Tracking Globalization). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    5. Cole M., Gay J., Glick J. A., & Sharp D. W. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. New York: Basic Books.
    6. Das J. P. & Dash U. N. (1989). Schooling, literacy, and cognitive development: A study in rural India. In, C.K. Leong & B. Randhawa (Eds.) Understanding literacy and cognition: Theory, research, and application. New York: Plenum Press.
    7. Greenberg J. & Muehlbach A. The Old World and It's New Economy: Notes on the «Third Age» in Western Europe Today. In J. Cole and D. Durham (Eds.) Jennifer Cole and Deborah. Durham. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN. 2006. P. 190—214.
    8. Hanakaw T., et al. (2003). Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. Journal of Neurophysiology. 89(2). 989—1002.
    9. Hatano G. (1997). Commentary: Core domains of thought, innate constraints, and sociocultural contexts. In H. M. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Eds.), The emergence of core domains of thought: Children's reasoning about physical, psychological, and biological phenomena. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. (Р. 71—78).
    10. Li S-C. (2006). Biocultural CoConstruction of Lifespan Development. In P. B. Baltes, P. A. ReuterLorenz, & F. Rosler, (Eds) (2006) Lifespan development and the brain: The perspective of biocultural coconstructivism. (pp. 40—57). N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
    11. Li J., Zhang Z., Nisbett R. E. (2004) Is It Culture or Is It Language? Examination of Language Effects in Cross Cultural Research on Categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 87 (1). 57—65.
    12. Luria A. R. (1976). Cognitive Development: It cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    13. Eugene Matusov (2008). Applying a Sociocultural Approach to Vygotskian Academia: `Our Tsar Isn't Like Yours, and Yours Isn't Like Ours' .Culture & Psychology. 14 (1). 50—35.

    14. Medin D. L., Ross N. O. & Cox D. G. (Eds.) (2006). Culture and resource conflict: Why meanings matter. N.Y., US: Russell Sage Foundation.
    15. Ostrosky-Solis F. (2004). Can literacy change brain anatomy? International Journal of Psychology. 39 (1). 1—4.
    16. Ross N., Medin D. Coley J. D. & Atran S. (2003). Cultural and experimental differences in the development of folkbiological induction. Cognitive Development. 8 (1). 25—47.
    17. Scribner S. (1977). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking. In P. N. Johnson Laird & P. C. Wason (Eds.). Thinking: Readings in cognitive science. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press.
    18. Stanley D., Phelps E., & Banaji MJ. (2008). The neural basis of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 17 (2).
    19. Tanaka, et al (2002)Tanaka S., & Michimata C., Kaminaga T., Honda M., & Sadato N. (2002). Superior digit memory of abacus experts: an eventrelated functional MRI study. NeuroReport. 13 (17): 2187—2191.
    20. Tulviste P. (1999). Activity as an explanatory principle in cultural psychology. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.) Activity theory and social practice. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press. (Р. 66—78).
    21. Vygotsky L. S. & Luria A. R. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. (V. I. Golod & J. E. Knox, Eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Information About the Authors

Michael Cole, Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Distinguished University Professor of Psychology, Communication, & Developmental Science, Emeritus, University of California, the head of the Laboratory of comparative human studies, San Diego, USA, e-mail: lchcmike@gmail.com

Metrics

Views

Total: 3388
Previous month: 4
Current month: 0

Downloads

Total: 919
Previous month: 0
Current month: 0