Profiles of Multiple Social Identification and Attitude to Representatives of Other Nations in Russians and Bulgarians: A Cross-Cultural Analysis

The paper explores latent profiles of social identification and attitudes to representatives of other nations in the cultural contexts of Russia and Bulgaria through the lens of personality-oriented approach. The research methodology included modified versions of social identity scales from the MIRIPS questionnaire and Verkuyten’s scale of religious identity. The online social psychological survey involved 234 Russians (66% females, 60% aged 30—49 years) and 278 Bulgarians (76% females, 45% aged 18-29). As a result, four latent profiles were identified in Russia (Internationalists, Individualists, Europeans, Nationalists) and three — in Bulgaria (Individualists, Europeans, Nationalists). Nevertheless, the content of the profiles as well as the features of the respondents constituting the profiles were similar. Nationalists displayed strong multiple identification and negative attitudes towards representatives of other nations; Individualists expressed weak multiple identification and negative attitudes towards representatives of other nations; Europeans demonstrated very strong European identification and positive attitudes towards representatives of other nations. The Internationalist profile was found only among the Russians and featured weak multiple identification and positive attitudes towards representatives of other nations. The paper concludes that there are both intercultural similarities and differences in the characteristics of the respondents that constitute each latent profile of multiple social identification and attitude to representatives of other nations.

1. Velev G. Natsionalizmut [The Nationalism]. Sofia: Znanie, 2005. 400 p. (In Bul.)
2. Golovashina O.V. Obraz Sovetskogo Soyuza v social’noy pamyati sovremennyh rossiyan (na materialah empiricheskogo issledovaniya) [Electronnyi resurs][Image of the Soviet Union in social memory of Russians (on materials of empirical research)]. Social’no-ekonomicheskiye yavleniya i process [Socioeconomic phenomena and processes], 2013. Vol. 11, no. 057. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ obraz-sovetskogo-soyuza-v-sotsialnoy-pamyati (Accessed 15.08.2021). (In Russ.)
3. Kotzeva T., Dimitrova E. Vizii za demografskiya problem v Bulgaria sled 1990g.: Pronatalizum i socialna politika. [Vision of the demographic problem in Bulgaria after 1990: Pronatalism and social policy]. Sofia: University Press Prof. Marin Drinov, 2014.175 p. (In Bul.)
4. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Strategii mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodeistviya migrantov I prinimaiyushego naseleniya Rossii [Strategies of intercultural interaction of migrants and host society in Russia]. Moscow: RUDN, 2009. (In Russ.)
5. Litvintseva G.O., Pashedko Yu. M. Russkaya kul’tura kak osnova nacional’noy identichnosti [Russian culture as a base for national identity]. Mezhdunarodniy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal [International research journal], 2017. Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 31—33. DOI:10.23670/IRJ.2017.65.018 (In Russ.).
6. Panina N.B. Sociologicheskiy monitoring. Ukrainskoe obschestvo 1994-2005: god pereloma [Sociological monitoring. Ukranian society between 1994 and 2005: the year of breakdown]. Kiev, 2005. (In Russ.)
7. Brewer M.B. Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In Ashmore R.D. (eds.), Rutgers series on self and social identity: Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction, 2001. Vol. 3, pp. 17—41.
8. Collins L., Lanza S. Topic Index. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences, 2010. DOI:10.1002/9780470567333. indsub
9. Dimitrova R., Chasiotis A., Bender M., van de Vijver F.J. Collective identity and well-being of Bulgarian Roma adolescents and their mothers. J Youth Adolesc., 2014. Vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 375—86. DOI:10.1007/s10964-013-0043-1
10. Dovidio J.F., Gaertner S.L., Kafati G. Group identity and intergroup relations: The common in-group identity model. In Thye S.R. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, 2000. Vol. 17, pp. 1—34. DOI:10.1016/S0882-6145(00)17002-X
11. Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture (2/e). London: Sage, 2013.
12. Foddy M., Platow M. J., Yamagishi T. Group-Based Trust in Strangers: The Role of Stereotypes and Expectations. Psychological Science, 2009. Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 419—422. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02312.x
13. Galyapina V., Lebedeva N., van de Vijver F. A three-generation study of acculturation and identity of the Russian minority in the Republic of North Ossetia—Alania. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2018, no. 49, pp. 976—992. DOI:10.1177/0022022118767578
14. Hampden-Turner Ch., Trompenaars F. Building cross-cultural competence: How to create wealth from conflicting values. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2000. 388 p.
15. Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. USA: McGraw- Hill, 2010.
16. Jetten J., Spears R., Postmes T. Intergroup Distinctiveness and Differentiation: A Meta-Analytic Integration. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2004. Vol. 86, pp. 862—79. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.862
17. Kaneva N., Popescu D. National Identity Lite: Nation Branding in Post-Communist Romania and Bulgaria. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2011, no. 14, pp. 191— 207. DOI:10.1177/1367877910382181
18. Lebedeva N.M., Tatarko A.N. Basic Values in Russia: Their Dynamics, Ethnocultural Differences, and Relation to Economic Attitudes. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 2018. Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 36—52.
19. Magun V., Rudnev M. Basic human values of Russians: both different from and similar to other Europeans. Sociology. SOC. Higher School of Economics, 2013, no. WP BRP 23SOC2013
20. Molenberghs P. The Neuroscience of In-group Bias. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2013. Vol. 37. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.002
21. Muthén B. O. Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 2002. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 81— 117. DOI:10.2333/bhmk.29.81
22. Plant E.A., Butz D.A., Tartakovsky M. Interethnic interactions: Expectancies, emotions, and behavioral intentions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2008. Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 555—574. DOI:10.1177/1368430208095827
23. Rouchy J.C. Cultural Identity and Groups of Belonging. Group, 2002. Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 205—217.
24. Schwartz S.H. The 7 Schwartz cultural value orientation scores for 80 countries [Electronnyi resourse], 2008. URL:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304715744_ The_7_Schwartz_cultural_value_orientation_scores_ for_80_countries. (Accessed 15.08.2021)
25. Verkuyten M. Religious group identification and inter-religious relations: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2007. Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 341—357. DOI:10.1177/1368430207078695