Coping Strategies in the Context of Russian Youth Self-Efficacy in the Modern Geopolitical Situation

Objective. Identification of coping strategies that have a positive effect on Russian youth self-efficacy in the current situation.
Background. The current geopolitical situation is an additional stressor for Russian youth. It can reduce both their self-efficacy and overall psychological well-being. In this regard, it is important for researchers to understand which coping strategies Russian youth use to overcome the current situation, and which of these coping strategies are significant for increasing youth self-efficacy.
Study design. We conducted the study in February-April 2023. Mixed methods were used. During the qualitative stage, we identified the coping strategies used by young people in the current situation. During the quantitative stage, we found the relationship of coping strategies with youth self-efficacy using hierarchical regression.
Participants. 10 respondents (5 men, 5 women; 18-30 years old) took part in the qualitative study, in the quantitative study – 172 respondents. The respondents were aged 18 to 30 (M = 21,58, SD = 2,93) (36,6% men, 63,4% women).
Measurements. Interview guide aimed at identifying coping strategies, Russian-language versions of the R. Schwarzer and M. Yerusalem scale of general self-efficacy, adapted by V. Romek, and V. Janke and G. Erdmann's scale of coping strategies for overcoming difficult life situations, adapted by N. Vodopyanova.
Results. The self-efficacy of Russian youth is positively associated with such coping strategies as “Problem Solving”, “Self-Control”, “Hobby” and negatively with “Problem Avoidance” and “Search for Social Support”.
Conclusions. In modern conditions, Russian youth self-efficacy was predicted only by active coping strategies focused on problem solving, self-control and involvement in interesting and meaningful activities for young people.

1. Baranov O.O. Rol' koping-strategii vo vzaimosvyazi sotsial'nykh identichnostei i samoeffektivnosti u rossiiskoi sovremennoi molodezhi [The role of coping strategies in the relationship between social identities and self-efficacy among modern Russian youth]. Vypuskanaya kvalifikatsionnaya rabota [Final qualification work]. Moscow, 2023, 127 p. (In Russ.).
2. Vodopyanova N.E., Vodopyanova N.E. Psikhodiagnostika stressa [Psychodiagnostics of stress]. Saint Petersburg: Pub “Piter”, 2013, pp. 336. (In Russ.).
3. Kruzhkova O.V., Nikiforova D.M. Problema diagnostiki koping-strategii v sovremennom psikhologicheskom izmerenii [The problem of diagnosing coping strategies in the modern psychological dimension]. Psikhofiziologiya = Psychology. Psychophysiology, 2012, no. 31, pp. 4–12. (In Russ.).
4. Maklakov A.G. Chelovek v ekstremal'nykh usloviyakh deyatel'nosti [Man in extreme operating conditions]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina = Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin, 2020, no. 4, pp. 165–180. (In Russ.).
5. Mineev J. Faktory, vliyayushchie na psikhologicheskoe sostoyanie v ekstremal'nykh situatsiyakh [Factors influencing the psychological state in extreme situations]. Nauchnyj dajdzhest Vostochno-Sibirskogo Instituta MVD Rossii = Scientific digest of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2020, pp. 162–168. (In Russ.).
6. Nestik T.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Otnoshenie k global'nym riskam: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskii analiz i perspektivy issledovanii [Attitude to global risks: socio-psychological analysis and research prospects]. Razrabotka ponyatiy sovremennoy psikhologii = Development of concepts of modern psychology, 2021, pp. 503–537. (In Russ.).
7. Romek V.G., Schwarzer R., Yerusalem M. Russkaya versiya shkaly obshchei samo-effektivnosti R. Shvartsera i M. Erusalema [Russian version of the scale of general self-efficacy by R. Schwarzer and M. Yerusalem]. Inostrannaya psikhologiya = Foreign psychology, 1996, no. 7, pp. 71–77. (In Russ.).
8. Fominykh E.S. Vzaimosvyaz' samoeffektivnosti i zhiznennoi pozitsii molodezhi [The relationship between self-efficacy and the life position of youth]. Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya = Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, psychology, 2020, no. 2, pp. 55–59. (In Russ.).
9. Shingaev S.M., Tyurnina L.V. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskiye posledstviya spetsial'noy voyennoy operatsii [Socio-psychological consequences of a special military operation]. Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Psikhologiya lichnosti v transformiruyushchemsya mire: vospitaniye, razvitiye, sotsializatsiya» ( Kaluga, 21-23 maya 2023 g.) [Collection of materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Personality Psychology in a Transforming World: Education, Development, Socialization”]. Kaluga, Publ. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Kaluga State University named after K.E. Tsiolkovsky", 2023, pp. 319–324. (In Russ.).
10. Jakuba E.M. Kharakteristika emotsional'nykh sostoyanii rossiyan posle nachala spetsial'noi voennoi operatsii na Ukraine [Characteristics of the emotional states of Russians after the start of a special military operation in Ukraine]. Nauchnyj aspect = Scientific aspect, 2023, no. 5, pp. 1569–1581. (In Russ.).
11. Akram B., Ghazanfar L. Self-efficacy and academic performance of the students of Gujrat University. Academic Research International, 2014. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 283–290.
12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977. Vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215.
13. Çakar F.S. The Relationship between the Self-Efficacy and Life Satisfaction of Young Adults. International Education Studies, 2012. Vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 123–130.
14. Cheng C., Lau H.P.B., Chan M.P.S. Coping flexibility and psychological adjustment to stressful life changes: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 2014. Vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1582–1607.
15. DeLongis A., Holtzman S. Coping in context: The role of stress, social support, and personality in coping. Journal of personality, 2005. Vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1633–1656.
16. Erikson E.H. Identity youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton Company, 1968. 336 p.
17. Folkman S., Lazarus R.S., Gruen R.J., DeLongis A. Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1986. Vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 571–579.
18. Fereday J., Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 2006. Vol. 5, no. 1, 80–92.
19. Freire C., Ferradás M.D.M., Regueiro B., Rodríguez S., Valle A., Núñez J.C. Coping strategies and self-efficacy in university students: A person-centered approach. Frontiers in psychology, 2020. Vol. 11. DOI:3389/fpsyg.2020.00841
20. Gross J.J. Emotion regulation: conceptual and empirical foundations. Handbook of emotion regulation, 2014. Vol. 2, pp. 3–20.
21. Jerusalem M., Mittag W. Self-efficacy in stressful life transitions. Self-efficacy in changing societies, 1995, pp. 177–201.
22. Jessor R., Donovan J.E., Costa F.M. Beyond adolescence: Problem behaviour and young adult development. Cambridge University Press, 1994. 332 p.
23. Pintrich P.R. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of educational Psychology, 2003. Vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 667–686.
24. Richardson M., Abraham C., Bond R. Psychological Correlates of University Students’ Academic Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2012. Vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 353–387.
25. Schulenberg J.E., Bryant A.L., O'Malley P.M. Taking hold of some kind of life: How developmental tasks relate to trajectories of well-being during the transition to adulthood. Development and psychopathology, 2004. Vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1119–1140.
26. Schwarzer R., Knoll N. Positive coping: Mastering demands and searching for meaning. Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures, 2003, pp. 393–409.
27. Settersten Jr.R.A., Furstenberg F.F., Rumbaut R.G. On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. University of Chicago Press, 2005. 608 p.
28. Shkëmbi F., Treska V. A Review of the Link Beetween Self-efficacy, Motivation and Academic Performance in Students. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 2023. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–31.
29. Skinner E.A., Edge K., Altman J., Sherwood H. Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 216–269.
30. Slovic P. The perception of risk. Routledge, 2016. 512 p.
31. Stephenson E., DeLongis A. Coping strategies. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology, Ch. 50, pp. 55–60. DOI:10.1002/9781119057840
32. Vaezfar S.S., Azadi M.M., Akbari Balootbangan A., Rahimi M. The role of coping styles and self-efficacy in nurses job stress in hospital. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 2014. Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 22–32.