Philosophical and scientific contexts of an empathy phenomenon

Thought concept of empathy is significant for psychological consultation and psychotherapy, in academic science this term is uncertain till now of: there is a variety of approaches and difference of theories is conventional. In the given review the basic contexts the problem of empathy in philosophy and psychology are analyzed. This allows to provide complete vision of an investigated phenomenon and to develop the approach to studying and empathy development, which will satisfy practice inquiries. Author considers empathy can be seen as the factor of human intersubjectivity in Gusserl phenomenology and studies it in modern researches of problems of consciousness and knowledge. The special attention is given to empathy researches as factor of motivation of altruism, moral behavior, empathy in "person-person" professions, and also to foreign researches of empathy in connection with the mirror neural networks opened in 1990th.

1. Agaveljan R.O. Jempatija kak faktor psihologicheskoj gotovnosti defektologa k professional'noj dejatel'nosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. M., 1995.
2. Andreeva I.N. Jemocional'nyj intellekt: issledovanie fenomena // Voprosy psihologii. 2007. № 5. s. 57-65.
3. Basin E.Ja.  Tvorchestvo i jempatija // Voprosy filosofii. 1987. № 2. s. 54-66.
4. Borisenko S.B. Metody formirovanija jempatii uchitelej: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. L., 1988.
5. Boujen M.V.-B. Duhovnost' i lichnostno-centrirovannyj podhod // Voprosy psihologii. 1992. № 3. S. 24 – 33.
6. Bohart A.K. Jempatija v klient-orientirovannoj psihoterapii: sopostavlenie s psihoanalizom i Ja-psihologiej // Inostrannaja psihologija. T.1. 1993. № 2. S. 57-64.
7. Vanershot G. Jempatija kak sovokupnost' mikroprocessov // K. Rodzhers i ego posledovateli: psihoterapija na poroge XXI veka / pod red. D. Brjeziera. M.: «Kogito-centr», 2005.
8. Vasil'kova A.P. Jempatija kak odin iz specificheskih kriteriev professional'noj prigodnosti buduwih specialistov-medikov: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. SPb. 1998.
9. Veber V. Vazhnye shagi k pomogajuwemu dialogu. Programma treninga, osnovannaja na prakticheskom opyte. SPb.: RATJePP, 1998.
10. Gavrilova T.P. Ponjatie jempatii v zarubezhnoj psihologii // Voprosy psihologii. 1975. № 2. S. 147- 158.
11. Gavrilova T.P. Jempatija i ee osobennosti u detej mladshego i srednego shkol'nogo vozrasta: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. M. 1977.
12. Gippenrejter Ju.B. Obwat'sja s rebjonkom. Kak? M.: Mass Media. 1995.
13. Gippenrejter Ju.B., Karjagina T.D., Kozlova E.N. Fenomen kongrujentnoj jempatii // Voprosy psihologii. 1993. № 4. S. 61- 68.
14. Goncharenko E.S. Razvitie jempatijnogo potenciala lichnosti: Na mate-riale issledovanija detej 7-8 let: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. Krasnodar, 2003.
15. Gusserl' Je. Kartezianskie razmyshlenija. SPb.: Nauka: Juventa, 1998.
16. Dormashev Ju.B., Romanov V.Ja. Vnimanie i otbor // Dormashev Ju.B., Romanov V.Ja. Psihologija vnimanija. Mju: Trivola, 1999. s. 47-77.
17. Doroshenko T.V. Jempatija kak faktor motivacii v professional'nom stanovlenii lichnosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. Habarovsk, 2007.
18. Igan Dzh. Bazisnaja jempatija kak kommunikativnyj navyk // Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2001. № 1. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.psyjournal.ru (data obrawenija 1.11.2009).
19. Igan Dzh. Slushanie i ponimanie verbal'nyh soobwenij: prakticheskie rekomendacii // Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2004. № 1. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.psyjournal.ru (data obrawenija 1.11.2009).
20. Karjagina T.D. Nekotorye aspekty razvitija predstavlenij ob jempatii // Psihologija obwenija – 2006: na puti k jenciklopedicheskomu znaniju: materialy mezhdunar. konf. M.: Akademija imidzhelogii, 2006. S. 373-380.
21. Klimova I.V. Znachenie jempatijnogo potenciala v reguljacii povedenija: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. SPb, 2002.
22. Kozina N.V. Issledovanie jempatii i ee vlijanija na formirovanie «sindroma jemocional'nogo sgoranija» u medicinskih rabotnikov: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. SPb. 1998.
23. Kohut H. Introspekcija, jempatija i psihoanaliz: issledovanie vzaimootnoshenij mezhdu sposobom nabljudenija i teoriej // Antologija sovremennogo psihoanaliza. T.1 / pod red. A.V. Rassohina. M.: Institut psihologii RAN, 2000.
24. Kolpachnikov V.V. Chelovekcentrirovannyj podhod v praktike psihologicheskogo konsul'tirovanija personala organizacij // Voprosy psihologii. 2000. № 3. S. 49-56.
25. Mendzherickaja Ju.A. Osobennosti jempatii sub#ektov zatrudnennogo i nezatrudnennogo obwenija v situacijah zatrudnennogo vzaimodejstvija: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. Rostov n/D, 1998.
26. Mihal'chenko G.F. Formirovanie jempatii u starsheklassnikov, orientirujuwihsja na pedagogicheskuju professiju: avtoref. dis. … kand. nauk. M., 1989.
27. Nagel' T. Kakovo byt' letuchej mysh'ju? [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/Article/nag_kak.php (data obrawenija 1.11.2009).
28. Orlov A.B., Hazanova M.A. Fenomeny jempatii i kongrujentnosti // Vo-prosy psihologii. 1993. № 4. S. 68-73.
29. Puzyrevskij V.Ju. Obrazovatel'nye perspektivy jempatii i tehniki // Filosofija obrazovanija. SPb., 2002, s. 115-119.
30. Puzyrevskij V.Ju. Fenomen jempatii v kontekste sovremennoj zapadnoj filosofii // Sibir'. Filosofija. Obrazovanie.: al'manah. 2002. Vyp. 6. S.103-118.
31. Rodzhers K. Klientocentrirovannyj/chelovekocentrirovannyj podhod v psihoterapii // Voprosy psihologii. 2001. № 2. S. 48-58.
32. Rodzhers K., Midor B. Lichnostno-centrirovannaja terapija // Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2002. № 4. [Jelektronnyj re-surs]. URL: http://www.psyjournal.ru (data obrawenija  1.11.2009).
33. Rodzhers K.   Jempatija. // Psihologija motivacii i jemocij / pod red. Ju.B. Gippenrejter i M.V. Falikman. M.: CheRo, 2002. S. 428-430.
34. Rodzhers K. Rodzhers, Kohut, Jerikson: Lichnyj vzgljad na nekotorye shodstva i razlichija. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://mary1982.narod.ru/rogers2.html (data obrawenija 1.11.2009).
35. Sardzhveladze N.I. O balanse proekcii i introekcii v processe jempaticheskogo vzaimodejstvija // Bessoznatel'noe: priroda, funkcii, metody issledovanija: V 4 t. / pod obw. red. A.S. Prangishvili, A.E. Sherozija, F.V. Bassina. T. 3. Tbilisi, 1978. S. 485-490.
36. Strelkova L.P. Psihologicheskie osobennosti razvitija jempatii u doshkol'nikov: avtoref. dis. … kand. psih. nauk. M., 1987.
37. Tjutjaeva O.V. Psihologicheskie osobennosti jempatii u detej srednego i starshego shkol'nogo vozrasta: avtoref. dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. Jaroslavl', 2002.
38. Jusupov I.M. Vchuvstvovanie, proniknovenie, ponimanie. Kazan', 1993.
39. Jagnjuk K.V. Priroda jempatii i ee rol' v psihoterapii // Zhurnal prakticheskoj psihologii i psihoanaliza. 2003. № 1. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.psyjournal.ru (data obrawenija 1.11.2009)
40. Adams, F. 2001. Empathy, neural Imaging and the Theory versus Simulation debate. Mind and language. Vol. 16. No. 4: 368-392.
41. Ansel, G., 2006. Developing Empathy  in Nurses: An Inservice Training Program. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. Volume 20. Issue 6: 249-257.
42. Barrett-Lennard, G.T. 1981. The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 28: 91-100.
43. Baron-Cohen, S. and. Wheelwright S., 2004. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal  of Autism  and Developmental Disorders. 34: 163–175.
44. Batson, C.D., Batson J.G., Griffitt C.A, Barrientos S., Brandt J.R., Sprengelmeyer P. and Bayly M.J., 1989. Negative-State Relief and the Empathy –Altruism Hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Volume 56 Issue 6: 922-933.
45. Batson, C.D.(a), 1997. Self-other merging and the empathy-altruism hypothesis: Reply to Neuberg et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 517-522.
46. Batson, C.D., Early S. and Salvarani G. (b), 1997. Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology  Bulletin 22: 751-758.
47. Batson, C.D., Dyck J.L., J. Brandt J.R.,, Batson J.G., Powell A.L., McMaster M.R. and Griffitt C., 1988. Five Studies Testing Two New Egoistic Alternatives to the Empathy — Altruism Hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Volume 55 Issue 1: 52-77.
48. Cialdini, R.B. , Neuberg S.L, Brown S.L., Luce C., Sagarin B.J. and Lewis B.P.,1997. Does Empathy  Lead to Anything More Than Superficial Help-ing? Comment on Batson et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Volume 73 Issue 3: 510-516.
49. Davis, M.H. 1996. Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
50. Goldstein, A.P. and Michaels G.Y. 1985. Empathy: development, training, consequences. New Jersy-London.
51. Gordon, T. 1970. Parent effectiveness training. Penguin books Canada Li-mited, Markham, Ontario.
52. Gordon, T. 1974. Teacher effectiveness training: N. Y.: Peter H. Wyden.
53. Hein, G. and Singer T. 2008. I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18: 1-6.
54. Eisenberg, N. and Strayer J.1987. Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press, New York.
55. Håkansson, J. 2003. Exploring the phenomenon of empathy. Doctoral Dissertation, Stockholm University, [Jelektronnyj resurs] URL: http://www.empathy.se (data obrawenija: 1.11.2009)
56. Hoffman, M.L. 1987. The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment. In Empathy and its development, ed. N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer,  47-80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Hoffman, M. 2000. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: University Press.
58. Lamm, C., Batson C.D. and Decety J. 2004. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective taking and emotion regulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19:1: 42-58.
59. Patterson, C.H. 1974. Relationship counseling and psychotherapy. Har-per&Row Publishers, N.Y.
60. Perez-Albeniz  F. and de Paul J. 2004. Gender differences in empathy in parents at high- and low-risk of child physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect. Volume 28 Issue 3: 289-300.
61. Preston, S. and de Waal F. 2002. Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 1-72. 
62. Ravenscroft I. 1997. Folk Psychology as a Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Jelektronnyj resurs] URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/ (data obrawenija: 1.11.2009)
63. Rizzolatti, G. and Craighero L. 2004. The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 27: 169-192.
64. Rogers, C. 1983. Freedom to learn for the 80's. Columbus, Ohio.
65. Stein, E.1989. On the problem of empathy. Washington: ICS Publications.
66. Stueber,K.2008. Empathy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Jelektronnyj resurs] URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/ (data obrawenija: 1.11.2009)
67. Vignemont, F. and Singer T. 2006. The empathic brain: how, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences Volume. 10 Issue 10: 435-441.
68. Wang, Y-W , Davidson M.M., Yakushko O.F., Savoy H.B., Tan G.A. and Bleier J.K. 2003.  The Scale of Ethnocultural Empathy:  Development, Validation, and Reliability. Journal of Counseling Psychology. Volume 50 Issue 2: 221-234.
69. Wispe, L. 1991.  The psychology of Sympathy. Plenum Press, New York&London.