Skip to Main Content

Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy
2015. Vol. 23, no. 4, 162–175
doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230410
ISSN: 2075-3470 / 2311-9446 (online)

The social status of a child in a group and its correlation with psychological, social-cognitive and behavioral characteristics

1506

A.V. Ammon, E.V. Filippova

PDF (RUS)
Online translation in english
GS
Information
in Google Scholar

Abstract

The relationship between peers is one of the most critical challenges of modern childhood. Research has shown the social status of a child in a group of peers influences not only his/her current well-being but his/her future psychological and physiological health condition. This article is devoted to the overview of foreign studies on social status of children and its correlation with different psychological, social-cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with special attention to rejected and neglected children. Despite the popularity of the reviewed subject and vast amount of research on it, some correlations still need additional research.

General Information

Keywords: social status of a child in group, peer relationship, neglected, rejected, aggression

Journal rubric: Research Reviews

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2015230410

For citation: Ammon A.V., Filippova E.V. The social status of a child in a group and its correlation with psychological, social-cognitive and behavioral characteristics. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2015. Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 162–175. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2015230410. (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.)

References

  1. Fel’dshtejn D.I. Sovremennoe Detstvo: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. Vestnik prak­ticheskoj psikhologii obrazovaniya. 2009. N 2(19). C. 28—32.
  2. Adler P.A., Kless S.J., Adler P. Socialization to Gender Roles: Popularity among Elemen­tary School Boys and Girls. Sociology of Education. 1992. 65 (3). pp. 169—187.
  3. Almquist Y. Peer status in school and adult disease risk: A 30-year follow-up study of disease-specific morbidity in a Stockholm cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2009. 63(12). pp. 9—16.
  4. Asher S.R., Wheeler V.A. Children’s loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1985. 53. pp. 500—505.
  5. Boivin M., Begin G. Peer status and self-perception among early elementary school children: the case of the rejected children. Child Development.1989. 60 (3). pp. 591—596.
  6. Borch C., Hyde A., Cillessen A.H. The role of attractiveness and aggression in high school popularity. Social Psychology of Education. 2011. 14(1). pp. 23—39.
  7. Buchanan H.T., Blankenbaker J., Cotten D. Academic and athletic ability as popularity factors in elementary school children. Research Quarterly. 1976. 47 (3). pp. 320—325.
  8. Cadwallader T.W. Sociometry reconsidered: The social context of peer rejection in childhood. International Journal of Action Methods: Psychodrama, Skill Training, and Role Playing. 2000—2001. 53 (3—4). pp. 99—118.
  9. Cassidy J., Asher S.R. Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Develop­ment. 1992. 63. pp. 350—365.
  10. Coie J.D. Toward a theory of peer rejection / Asher S.R., Coie J.D. Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1990. pp. 365—399
  11. Coie J.D., Dodge K.A. Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status. Child Development. 1988. 59. pp. 815—829.
  12. Coie J.D., Kupersmidt J. A behavioral analysis of emerging social status in boys’ groups. Child Development. 1983. 54. pp. 1400—1416.
  13. Coie J.D., Dodge K.A., Coppotelli H. Dimensions and types of status: A cross-age per­spective. Developmental Psychology. 1982. 18 (4). pp. 557—570.
  14. Crick N.R. The role of overt aggression, relational aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child Development. 1996. 67 (5). pp. 2317—2327.
  15. Crick N.R., Dodge K.A. A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin.1994. 115 (1). pp. 74—101.
  16. Crick N.R., Bigbee M.A., Howes C. Gender Differences in Children’s Normative Beliefs about Aggression: How Do I Hurt Thee? Let Me Count the Ways. Child Develop­ment. 1996. 67 (3). pp. 1003—1014.
  17. Dodge K.A., Coie J.D. Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987. 53(6). pp. 1146—1158.
  18. Dodge K.A. Lansford J., Burks V., Bates J.E., Pettit G., Fontaine R. Peer rejection and so­cial information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior prob­lems in children. Child Development. 2003. 74. pp. 374—393.
  19. Dunn J.C., Dunn J.G., Bayduza A. Perceived athletic competence, sociometric status, and loneliness in elementary school children. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2007. 30 (3). pp. 249—269.
  20. Gresham F.M., Evans S., Elliott S.N. Academic and Social Self-Efficacy Scale: Develop­ment and Initial Validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 1988. 6 (2). pp. 125—138.
  21. Hart C.H., Ladd G.W., Burleson B.R. Children’s expectations of the outcomes of social strategies: Relations with sociometric status and maternal disciplinary styles. Child Development. 1990. 61. pp. 127—137.
  22. Jensen-Campbell L.A., Adams R., Perry D.G., Workman K.A., Furdella J.Q., Egan S.K. Agreeableness, extroversion and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality. 2002. 36 (3). pp. 224—251.
  23. La Greca A.M., Stone W.L. Social Anxiety Scale for Children—Revised: Factor Structure and Concurrent Validity. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1993. 22 (1). pp. 17—27.
  24. LaFontana K.M., Cillessen A. The nature of children’s stereotypes of popularity. Social Development. 1998. 7. pp. 301—320.
  25. Lemerise E.А., Arsenio W.F. An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information. Child Development. 2000. 71. pp. 107—118.
  26. Lopez E.E., Olaizola J.H., Ferrer B.M., Ochoa G.M. Aggressive and nonaggressive re­jected students: an analysis of their differences. Psychology in the Schools. 2006. 43(3). pp. 387—400.
  27. Lubbers M.J., Van Der Werf M.P., Kuype, H., Offringa G J. Predicting Peer Acceptance in Dutch Youth: A Multilevel Analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 2006. 26 (1). pp. 4—35.
  28. Maassen G.H. Stability of three methods for two-dimensional sociometric status deter­mination based on the procedure of Asher, Singleton, Tinsley and Hymel. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal. 2004. 32 (6). pp. 535—550.
  29. Orobio de Castro B., Veerman J.W., Koops W.B., Bosch J.D., Monshouwer, H.J. Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Child Development. 2002. 73(3). pp. 916—934.
  30. Parkhurst J.T., Asher S.R. Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in be­havior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology. 1992. 28 (2). pp. 231—241.
  31. Pettit G.S., Clawson M.A., Dodge K.A., Bates J. E. Stability and Change in Peer-Rejected Status: The Role of Child Behavior, Parenting, and Family Ecology. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1996. 42 (2). pp. 267—294.
  32. Puklek Levpuscek M., Berce J. Social Anxiety, Social Acceptance and Academic Self-Perceptions in High-School Students. Društvena istraåivanja. 2012. 21 (2). pp. 405—419.
  33. Putallaz M., Wasserman A. Children’s entry behaviors / Asher S.R., Coie J.D. Peer re­jection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1990. pp. 60—89 Rabiner D., Gordon L. The coordination of conÀicting social goals: Differences between rejected and nonrejected boys. Child Development. 1992. 63. pp. 1344—1350.
  34. Rubin K., Rose-Krasnor L. Interpersonal Problem-Solving and Social Competence in Children / Hasselt V., Hersen M. Handbook of Social Development: A Lifespan Perspective. New York: Plenum. 1992. pp. 283—323.
  35. Rubin K., Bukowski W., Parker J. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Hand­book of child, psychology (6th ed.) (Т. 3: Social, Emotional, and Personality Devel­opment). New York: Wiley. 2006. pp. 571—645.
  36. Salmivalli С., Kaukiaine, A., Lagerspetz K. Aggression and Sociometric Status among Peers: Do Gender and Type of Aggression Matter? Scandinavian Journal of Psy­chology. 2000. 41. pp. 17—24.
  37. Sandstrom M.J., Coie J.D. A developmental perspective on peer rejection: mechanisms of stability and change. Child Development. 1999. 70. pp. 955—966.
  38. Schuster B. Outsiders at School: The Prevalence of Bulling and Its Relation with Social Status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 1999. 2 (2). pp. 175—190.
  39. Wentzel K.R., Asher S.R. The Academic lives of Neglected, Rejected, Popular, and Con­troversial Children. Child Development. 1995. 66 (3). pp. 754—763.
  40. Wheeler V.A., Ladd, G.W. Assessment of children’s self-ef¿cacy for social interactions with peers. Developmental Psychology. 1982. 18. pp. 795—805.

Information About the Authors

Anna V. Ammon, Psychologist, Graduate of the Faculty of Consultative and Clinical Psychology, Moscow City University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, e-mail: AnnaAmmon@mail.ru

Elena V. Filippova, PhD in Psychology, Professor, the head of the Child and family psychotherapy chair, Psychologicalcounseling faculty, Senior researcher, scientific secretary of the Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, employee of the Psychological Consultation of the Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, member of the editorial board of the journal “Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy”, member of the editorial board of the journal “Psychological Science and Education”., Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1328-3041, e-mail: e.v.filippova@mail.ru

Metrics

Views

Total: 3647
Previous month: 60
Current month: 33

Downloads

Total: 1506
Previous month: 5
Current month: 2