The «I—Other» Relations in One Special Situation of Communication

The individual ways of the stutter correction group participants are considered in the article. We see this situation as difficult and even antinomical for participant because it requires the his partial rejection of self-control and a trust in handing over his consciousness to the group leader. We assume that this aspect of communication is expressed only stronger in the situation considered here, but is presented in all kinds of communication. On the other hand, not only psychology, but also our culture lacks in adequate measures for understanding and control of such a processes in the communication. Our analysis of participant’s interviews shows that the participant’s way in the correctional process depends on ones attitudes towards the problem of handing control over one’s condition to the group leader.

1. Busygina N.P. Fenomenologicheskii i germenevticheskii podkhody v kachestvennykh psikhologicheskikh issledovaniyakh. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2009. № 1. P. 57—65.
2. Kovalev G.A., Radzikhovskii L.A. Obshchenie i problema interiorizatsii. Voprosy psik- hologii. 1985. № 1. P. 110—120.
3. Krichevets A.N. Passivnost’ v deyatel’nosti. Za predely oksyumorona. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. T. 6. № 31. URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/ 2013v6n31/880-krichevets31.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2015).
4. Krichevets A.N. Cogito, Drugoi i predstavleniya o psikhicheskom. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2010. № 5(13). URL: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2010n5- 13/377-krichevets13.html (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2015).
5. Kosilova E.K., Krichevets A.N. Sub”ekt i Drugie. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta (Seriya 7. Filosofiya). 2011. № 6. P. 78—102.
6. Levinas E. Izbrannoe: Total’nost’ i beskonechnoe. Moscow: Publ. St. Petersburg: Publ. Kul’turnaya initsiativa: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 416 p.
7. Mal’dine A. O sverkhstrastnosti. (Post)fenomenologiya. Novaya fenomenologiya vo Frantsii i za ee predelami. Moscow: Publ. Akademicheskii proekt, 2014. P. 151—203.
8. Nekrasova Yu.B. Seans psikhoterapevticheskogo vozdeistviya i nekotorye psikhicheskie sostoyaniya zaikayushchikhsya. Voprosy psikhologii. 1980. № 3. P. 32—40.
9. Novoselova A.S., Kosolapova L.A. Vzaimodeistvie ubezhdeniya i vnusheniya v protsesse sotsializatsii i resotsializatsii podrostkov i molodezhi. Vestnik PGGPU (Seriya № 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki). 2013. № 2. P. 5—18.
10. Petrovskii V.A. Myslyu? — Da! No sushchestvuyu li? Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psik- hologiya. 2011. № 3. P. 12—26.
11. Sartr Zh.-P. Bytie i nichto. Moscow: Publ. Respublika, 2000. 636 p.
12. Skripkina T.P. Psikhologiya doveriya. Moscow: Publ. Academia, 2000. 264 p.
13. Sokuler Z.A. German Kogen i filosofiya dialoga. Moscow: Publ. Progress-Traditsiya, 2008. 312 p.
14. Tengeli L. Interv’yu s professorom Laslo Tengeli: Universitet Vuppertalya: 2 iyunya 2012. Chast’ 1 (per. s nem. A. Kozyrevoi, G. Chernavina). Horizon: Fenomeno- logicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. T. 1. № 2. P. 232—247. (in Russ).
15. Shvarts I.E. Vnushenie v pedagogicheskom protsesse. In: Uchitel’: Kniga o professore Izraile Efremoviche Shvartse (sost. N.G. Lipkina, L.A. Kosolapova, A.I. Sannikova, B.M. Charnyi). Perm’: Knizhnyi mir, 2009. P. 79—387.
16. Karpova N.L. Lev Vygotsky’s ideas in family group logopsychotherapy. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2014. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 90—99.
17. Zahavi D. Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy. 2010. Inquire, Vol. 53. № 3. P. 285—306. doi:10.1080/00201741003784663
18. Zahavi D. Intentionality and Phenomenality: Phenomenological Take on the Hard Problem. The Problem of Consciousness: New Essays in Phenomenological Philos- ophy of Mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 2003. Vol. 29. Special issue (Supple- ment 1). P. 63—92. doi:10.1080/00455091.2003.10717595