Critical Thinking in the Context of Embodied Cognition: a Review of Psychological Research and its Pedagogical Potential

The article presents an overview of current research on critical thinking based on the hypothesis of embodied cognition and representing the so-called non-Cartesian approach to thinking, in which the rational and the sensual do not act independently from each other, but as a closely related group of processes. Despite the fact that the topic of critical thinking in this research area is yet in the process of formation, the review is systematic and contains indications of two main directions, their theoretical guidelines and methodological guidelines. A comparison of the identified approaches makes it possible to identify the mechanisms that are key to any embodied version of the critical thinking model: an individual's sensitivity to his own explicit and implicit epistemic signals, or dispositional attentiveness, and emotional non-activity. It is shown that interdisciplinary transfer in this topic is problematic: knowledge produced in the psychological framework of embodied cognition research is inherently different from knowledge that allows improving the learning process of critical thinking. The results obtained open up prospects for further research and ways to reorganize pedagogical practice in the field of teaching critical thinking

1. Babikova, N. N., Mal'ceva, O. A., Starceva, E. N., Turkina, M. S. Issledovanie metakognitivnoj osoznannosti studentov universiteta [Research of metacognitive awareness of university students]. Vestnik of the Mari State University, 2018, no. 12(3), pp. 9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30914/2072-6783-2018-12-3-9-16
2. Barbashina, E. V. Kriticheskoe myshlenie v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya za rubezhom [Critical Thinking in the System of Higher Education Abroad]. Idei i idealy = Ideas and Ideals, 2022, no. 4(1), pp. 120-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2022-14.4.1-120-136
3. Brass, A. A. Kriticheskoe myshlenie i kriticheskie emocii [Critical thinking and critical emotions]. Aktual'nye problemy psihologii truda: teoriya i praktika = Actual problems of labor psychology: theory and practice, 2021, pp. 15-18. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_47449666_16868874.pdf
4. Glukh K. YU., Ponomarev A. S. Fenomen kognitivnyh iskazhenij i ih vliyanie na studentov vysshih obrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdenij [The phenomenon of cognitive distortions and their impact on students of higher educational institutions] Vestnik nauki = Bulletin of Science, 2023, no. 1(6), pp. 714-725.
5. Vilenskaya G. A. Ispolnitel'nye funkcii: priroda i razvitie [Executive functions: nature and development]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 2016, 37(4), pp. 21-31. URL: https://lib.ipran.ru/upload/papers/paper_26468884.pdf
6. Girinskij A. A., Lepetyuhina A. O. Kriticheskoe myshlenie kak navyk orientacii cheloveka v obshchestve moderna [Critical thinking as a human orientation skill in modern society] Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika = Domestic and foreign pedagogy, 2022, no. 1 (6), pp. 43-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2224-0772-2022-88-43-57
7. Girinskij A. A., Lepetyuhina A. O., Pashchenko T. V. Koncepciya kriticheskogo myshleniya: genezis ponyatiya i aktual'nye problemy primeneniya v obrazovanii [The Concept of Critical Thinking: the Genesis of the Concept and Current Problems of Application in Education], Mir psihologii = World of Psychology, 2023, no. 3, pp. 286-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51944/20738528_2023_3_286
8. Kazanceva E. V. Tekhnologiya majndfulness v kontekste sovremennogo obrazovaniya. [Mindfulness technology in the context of modern education]. Aktual'nye voprosy social'noj pedagogiki i psihologii: teoriya i praktika = Current issues of social pedagogy and psychology: theory and practice, 2019, pp. 241-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31483/r-53790
9. Koreshnikova YU. N. Organizacionnye i pedagogicheskie usloviya razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya u studentov vuzov [organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of critical thinking among university students]. M.: Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki, 2021. URL: https://www.hse.ru/sci/diss/484151933
10. Larionov P. M., Ageenkova E. K., Belashina T. V. Psihometricheskie svojstva russkoyazychnoj versii kratkoj formy Pertskoj shkaly emocional'noj reaktivnosti [Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale-Short Form]. Nevrologiya, nejropsihiatriya, psihosomatika = Neurology, neuropsychiatry, psychosomatics, 2021, no. 13(2), pp. 26-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2021-2-26-33
11. Loginov N. I., Spiridonov V. F. Osnovnye eksperimental'nye paradigmy v issledovaniyah voploshchyonnogo poznaniya v oblasti resheniya myslitel'nyh zadach [Embodied problem solving: a review of experimental paradigms]. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2023, no, 20(3), pp. 418-427. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2023-3-418-427
12. Pozdnyakov M.V. Kriticheskoe myshlenie: ego sushchnost' i prisutstvie vo obrazovatel'nyh programmah rossijskih vuzov [Critical thinking: its essence and presence in the educational programs of Russian universities] // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2023, no. 492, pp. 68–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/492/8
13. Svetonosova L. G., Korchagina-Mokeeva A. G. Metodika organizacii i provedeniya seminarov-pogruzhenij po pedagogike v kontekste razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya obuchayushchihsya vuza [Methods of organizing and conducting seminars-dives in pedagogy in the context of developing critical thinking of University students], Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psihologiya = World of Science. Pedagogical and Psychology, no. 8(2) URL: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/48PDMN220.pdf
14. Slonova A. I. Praktiki osoznannosti v razvitii tvorcheskogo potenciala detej: vozmozhnosti ispol'zovaniya v rabote prakticheskogo psihologa [Mindfulness in the Development of Children’s Creative Potential: Opportunities for Use in the Work of a Practical Psychologist]. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2022, no. 19(3), pp. 642-656. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2022-3-642-656
15. Solodihina, M. V. Kriticheskoe myshlenie v vysshem estestvennonauchnom obrazovanii: opredelenie i soderzhanie ponyatiya [Critical thinking in higher natural science education: definition and the content of the concept]. Mocsow, MGPU, 2022.
16. Fedunina N. YU., Vihristyuk O. V., Bannikov G. S. Praktiki osoznannosti v profilaktike suicidal'nogo povedeniya podrostkov (obzor zarubezhnyh issledovanij) [Mindfulness practices in the prevention of suicidal behavior in adolescents (a review of foreign studies)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 14. Psihologiya = Bulletin of Moscow University. Serie 14. Psychology, 2019, no. 2, pp. 121-144. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2019.02.121
17. Bechara A., Damasio A. R. The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and economic behavior, 2005, no. 52(2), pp. 336-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010
18. Bechtold L., Cosper S. H., Malyshevskaya A., Montefinese M., Morucci P., Niccolai V., Repetto C., Zappa A., Shtyrov Y. Brain signatures of embodied semantics and language: a consensus paper. Journal of Cognition, 2023, no. 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334%2Fjoc.237
19. Botvinick M. M., Braver T. S., Barch D. M., Carter C. S., Cohen J. D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological review, 2001, no. 108(3), pp. 624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624
20. Clark A. An embodied cognitive science? Trends in cognitive sciences, 1999, no. 3(9), pp. 345-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01361-3
21. Cochrane L. Of One Mind: Proposal For A Non-Cartesian Cognitive Architecture, Concordia University, 2014. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1685.1925
22. Dacey A. Come now, let us reason together: Cognitive bias, individualism, and interactionism in critical thinking education // Informal Logic, 2020, no. 40(1), pp. 47-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v40i1.6024
23. Damasio A. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. GP Putnam’s Sons. New York, 1994.
24. Damasio A. R. Descartes error revisited. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 2001, no. 10(2), pp. 192-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jhin.10.2.192.7250
25. Damasio A. R. In Reply to Geir Kirkeben. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 2001, no, 10(2), pp. 197-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jhin.10.2.173.7255
26. Damasio A. R. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2003.
27. Damasio A. R. The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures. Vintage, 2018.
28. de Acedo Lizarraga M. L. S., de Acedo Baquedano M. T. S., Villanueva O. A. Critical thinking, executive functions and their potential relationship. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2012, no. 7(3), pp. 271-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.008
29. Dennett D. C. Review of Damasio, Descartes’ Error. Times Literary Supplement, 1995, p. 25.
30. Glenberg A. M. Embodiment for education. Handbook of cognitive science, 2008, pp. 355-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-046616-3.00018-9
31. Høffding S., Heimann K., Martiny K. Working with others’ experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2023, no. 22 (1), pp. 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09873-z
32. Janssen E. M. Teaching critical thinking in higher education: Avoiding, detecting, and explaining bias in reasoning. Utrecht University, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33540/351
33. Jóhannesdóttir G. R. The Inner Landscape of the Body: Phenomenology of Thinking. In: Feminist Philosophy Time, history and the transformation of thought (Synne Myrebøe, Valgerður Pálmadóttir & Johanna Sjöstedt (eds.), no. 202, pp. 317-337.
34. Jukes S. Thinking with a landscape: The Australian Alps, horses and pedagogical considerations. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 2021, no. 37(2), pp. 89-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2020.26
35. Kirkeben G. Descartes Embodied Psychology: Descartes or Damasios Error? Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 2001, 10(2), pp. 173-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jhin.10.2.173.7255
36. Kirkeben G. Sources of Damasios Error A Reply to Damasio. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 2001, 10(2), pp. 195-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jhin.10.2.195.7247
37. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press, 2008.
38. Lamont P. The construction of “critical thinking”: Between how we think and what we believe. History of Psychology, 2020, 23(3), pp. 232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000145
39. Laurillard D. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge, 2013.
40. Lemmen R. Towards a non-Cartesian cognitive science: in the light of the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty, University of Sussex, 1997.
41. Li S., Ren X., Schweizer K., Brinthaupt T. M., Wang T. Executive functions as predictors of critical thinking: Behavioral and neural evidence. Learning and Instruction, 2021, no. 71, p. 101376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101376
42. Murti H. A. S., Hastjarjo T. D., Patria B. The Role of Critical Thinking and Executive Function in Misconceptions in Psychology. Jurnal Psikologi, 2021, no. 20(1), pp. 10-21. https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.20.1.10-21
43. Nathan M. J. Rethinking formalisms in formal education. Educational Psychologist, 2012, no. 47(2), pp. 125-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667063
44. Nathan M. J. Foundations of embodied learning: A paradigm for education. Routledge, 2021.
45. Negri A., Castiglioni M., Caldiroli C. L., Barazzetti A. Language and intelligence: A relationship supporting the embodied cognition hypothesis. Journal of Intelligence, 2022, no. 10(3), pp. 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10030042
46. Noone C., Bunting B., Hogan M. J. Does mindfulness enhance critical thinking? Evidence for the mediating effects of executive functioning in the relationship between mindfulness and critical thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 2016, no. 6, p. 2043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2015.02043
47. Phelps E. A. Emotion and cognition: insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 2006, no.57, pp. 27-53. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070234
48. Pulvermüller F. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in cognitive sciences, 2013, no. 17(9), pp. 458-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
49. Rizzolatti G., Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2004, no.27, p. 169-192. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
50. Robbins P., Aydede M. The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
51. Rupert R. D. Extended Cognition and the Boundaries of the Mind. Ten Lectures on Cognition, Mental Representation, and the Self, 2023, pp. 229-280. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379457.001.0001
52. Schmitt W. A., Brinkley C. A., Newman J. P. Testing Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathic individuals: risk takers or risk averse? Journal of abnormal psychology, 1999, no. 108(3), pp. 538.
53. Schoeller D. Micro-phenomenology as a practice of critical thinking, Constructivist Foundations, 2021, no. 16(2), pp. С. 195-197.
54. Schoeller D. Thinking at the edge in the context of embodied critical thinking: Finding words for the felt dimension of thinking within research. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2023, no. 22(1), pp. 289-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09861-3
55. Schoeller D., Thorgeirsdottir S. Embodied critical thinking: The experiential turn and its transformative aspects. Philosophia, 2019, no. 9(1), pp. 92-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2019.0015
56. Schwartz D. L., Martin T., Nasir N. I. Designs for knowledge evolution: towards a prescriptive theory for integrating first-and second-hand knowledge. Cognition, education, and communication technology, 2014, pp. 21-54.
57. Searle J. R. Minds, brains and science. Harvard university press, 1986.
58. Teper R., Segal Z. V., Inzlicht M. Inside the mindful mind: How mindfulness enhances emotion regulation through improvements in executive control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2013, no. 22(6), pp. 449-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413495869
59. Tettamanti M., Buccino G., Saccuman M. C., Gallese V., Danna M., Scifo P., Fazio F., Rizzolatti G., Cappa S. F., Perani D. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2005, 17(2), pp. 273-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053124965
60. Valach L. Enacted mind, enminded and encultured action in vocational counseling: contextual action theory. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 2021, no. 21(1), pp. 123-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-020-09432-5
61. Zou Y., Li P., Hofmann S. G., Liu X. The mediating role of non-reactivity to mindfulness training and cognitive flexibility: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in psychology, 2020, no. 11, pp. 1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01053