Formation of Independence in an Early Age Child: Cross-Cultural Aspects

146

Abstract

The article points out the need to record new childhood phenomena as well as to study the influence of parents and significant adults, their communication with the child in the process of interaction on the development of children’s independence in modern reality. Cross-cultural aspects of the formation of child independence in Russia and Vietnam are considered. Also presented are the main results of one assessment from the study on the dynamics of the formation of child independence at the age of 2 years in the process of interaction with the subject and in communication with an adult. Forty-three dyads (mother and child) from Russia and Vietnam took part in the study. The purpose of the study was as follows: to determine the stage of child independence formation by the age of 2 in the process of interaction with the subject and in communication with an adult; to determine the level of social, emotional and adaptive development of children in Russia and Vietnam. The methodological basis of the study is the approach of M.I. Lisina. The study of the child’s communicative signals was carried out in the process of a fifteen-minute parent-child interaction (spontaneous play) using video recording, followed by analysis in the program “The Observer XT-16”. Research methods: 1) assessment of child-parent interaction on the scale “Communicative signals of the child” of the technique “Evaluation of child-parent interaction” [ECPI-II]; 2) assessment of the social and emotional development of the child was carried out according to the Bayley Development Scales-III (BSID-III). The results showed that the level of independence in children from the Russian sample is generally higher than that from the Vietnamese sample. Statistically significant differences were revealed on the scales: “Functions of the pre-learning period” and “Self-care” of the Bailey scale (BSID-III). Children from the Russian sample are in the middle of transition between the second and third stages of the dynamics of child independence development in the process of interaction with the subject and the adult, whereas children from the Vietnamese sample demonstrated a more pronounced repertoire of indicators related to stage 2. Also, in the Russian sample the duration of manifestation of the following indicators significantly dominates: “Sensitivity to the influence of an adult ‘+’” and “Sensitivity to the influence of an adult ‘-’”.

General Information

Keywords: toddlerhood, communication, mother-child relations, research activity, parent-child interaction, stages of development of independence, video analysis, The Observer XT-16, parenting

Journal rubric: Educational Psychology

Article type: scientific article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2022270305

Funding. The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project number 19-513-92001 “Cross-cultural features of interaction between a significant adult and a child in Russia and Vietnam”.

Acknowledgements. The authors are grateful to the colleagues from the National Pedagogical College of Nha Trang, Vietnam, for their help in conducting the study.

Received: 28.02.2022

Accepted:

For citation: Shinina T.V., Morozova I.G., Nguyen T.L. Formation of Independence in an Early Age Child: Cross-Cultural Aspects. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2022. Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 50–64. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2022270305.

References

  1. Andreeva A.D., Lisichkina A.G. Kul’turnaya traditsiya obrashcheniya vzroslykh k rebenku rannego vozrasta kak proektsiya obraza detstva [The cultural tradition of adults addressing a young child as a projection of the image of childhood]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya // Theoretical and experimental psychology, 2019, no. 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturnaya-traditsiya-obrascheniya-vzroslyh-k-rebenku-rannego-vozrasta-kak-proektsiya-obraza-detstva (Accessed 03.02.2022). (In Russ.).
  2. Veraksa N.E. Detskoe razvitie: dve paradigmy [Child Development: Two Paradigms]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 2018. Vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 102—108. DOI:10.17759/chp.2018140211 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  3. Vygotskiĭ L.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 6 t. T. 4 [Collected works: in 6 vol. Vol. 4]. In Zaporozhtsa A.V. (ed.). Moscow: Publ. Pedagogika, 1984. 432 p. (In Russ.).
  4. Galasyuk I.N., Shinina T.V., Shvedovskaya A.A., Morozova I.G., Efremova E.V., Nguen T.Kh., Nguen T.L. Vzaimodeistvie znachimogo vzroslogo s rebenkom rannego vozrasta v Rossii i V’etname [Significant Adult Interaction with Young Child in Russia and Vietnam]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 47—62. DOI:10.17759/pse.2019240605 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  5. Galasyuk I.N., Shinina T.V., Irgashev N.R., Morozova I.G., Pasechnik O.N. Otkrytaya professional’naya ekspertiza metodiki detsko-roditel’skogo vzaimodeĭstviya: vektory razvitiya psikhologicheskogo instrumentariya [Open professional examination of the methodology of parent-child interaction: development vectors of psychological tools]. Aktual’nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy psikhologii [Actual problems of psychological knowledge. Theoretical and practical problems of psychology], 2018, no. 3(48), pp. 5—24. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
  6. Galasyuk I.N. Semeinaya psikhologiya: metodika «otsenka detsko-roditel’skogo vzaimodeistviya». Evaluation of child-parent interaction (ecpi-2.0) [Family psychology: evaluation of child-parent interaction (ecpi-2.0)]. In Galasyuk I.N., Shinina T.V. (eds.). Moscow: Publ. Yurait, 2019. 223 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Galasyuk I.N., Shinina T.V. «Otsenka detsko-roditel’skogo vzaimodeistviya» Evaluation of child-parent interaction (ECPI) [Evaluation of child-parent interaction (ECPI)]. Moscow: Publ. ITD Perspektiva, 2017. 304 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Karabanova O.A. V poiskah optimal’nogo stilja roditel’skogo vospitanija [Finding the Best Parenting Style]. Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal // National Psychological Journal, 2019. Vol. 3, no. 3(35), pp. 71—79. DOI:10.11621/npj.2019.0308 (In Russ.).
  9. Lisina M.I. Formirovanie lichnosti rebenka v obshchenii [The formation of the personality of the child in communication]. Saint-Petersburg: Publ. Piter, 2009. 320 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Polivanova K.N. Detstvo v menyayushchemsya mire [Childhood in a Changing World]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya = Modern foreign psychology, 2016. Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 5—10. DOI:10.17759/jmfp.2016050201 (In Russ.).
  11. Smirnova E.O. Vlijanie predmetno-prostranstvennoj sredy na igrovuju iniciativnost’ doshkol’nikov [The influence of the object-spatial environment on the game initiative of preschoolers]. Pedagogika // Pedagogy, 2020, no. 3, pp. 72—82. (In Russ.).
  12. Smirnova E.O. Specifika sovremennogo doshkol’nogo detstva [Specifics of modern childhood]. Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal // National Psychological Journal, 2019. Vol. 2, no. 2(34), pp. 25—32. DOI:10.11621/npj.2019.0205 (In Russ.).
  13. Tokarskaya L.V., Lavrova M.A., Bakushkina N.I., Galasyuk I.N., Koryakov Ya.I., Pasechnik O.N., Permyakova M.E., Khlystova E.V., Chegodaev D.A., Shinina T.V. Detsko-roditel’skoe vzaimodeistvie i razvitie rebenka rannego vozrasta [Child-parent interaction and early childhood development]. Pod redaktsiei L.V. Tokarskoi: kollektivnaya monografiya. Ekaterinburg, 2019. 206 p. (In Russ.).
  14. Shinina T.V., Mitina O.V. Razrabotka i aprobacija oprosnika «Gotovnost’ podrostkov k samostojatel’noj zhizni»: ocenka i razvitie zhiznennyh navykov [Design and Validation of the «Adolescents’ Readiness for Independent Living» Questionnaire: Assessment and Development of Life Skills]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2019. Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 50—68. DOI:10.17759/pse.2019240104 (In Russ., in Engl.).
  15. Shinina T.V., Mitina O.V. Shkala kommunikativnykh signalov rebenka rannego vozrasta: otsenka detsko-roditel’skogo vzaimodeistviya [Early Childhood Communication Signals Scale: Assessing Child-Parent Interaction]. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 2022. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 17—27. DOI:10.17759/chp.2022180102 (In Russ., in Engl.).
  16. Ang R.P.H., Goh D.H.L. Authoritarian parenting style in Asian societies: a cluster analytic investigation. Contemporary Family Therapy, 2006. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 131—151. DOI:10.1007/s10591-006-9699-y
  17. Barlow J., Coren E. The Effectiveness of Parenting Programs: A Review of Campbell Reviews. Research on Social Work Practice, 2018. Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 99—102. DOI:10.1177/1049731517725184
  18. Belsky J. The determinants of parenting: a process model. Child Development, 1984. Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 83—96. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1984.tb00275.x
  19. Boldt L.J., Goffin K.C., Kochanska G. The significance of early parent-child attachment for emerging regulation: a longitudinal investigation of processes and mechanisms from toddler age to preadolescence. Developmental psychology, 2020. Vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 431—443. DOI:10.1037/dev0000862
  20. Collins W.A., Maccoby E.E., Steinberg L., Hetherington E.M., Bornstein M.H. Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. The American psychologist, 2000. Vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 218—232. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.218
  21. Dishion T.J., Mun C.J., Tein J.Y., Kim H., Shaw D.S., Gardner F., Wilson M.N., Peterson J. The Validation of Macro and Micro Observations of Parent-Child Dynamics Using the Relationship Affect Coding System in Early Childhood. Prevention Science, 2017. Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 268—280. DOI:10.1007/s11121-016-0697-5
  22. Finan S.J., Swierzbiolek B., Priest N., Warren N., Yap M. Parental engagement in preventive parenting programs for child mental health: a systematic review of predictors and strategies to increase engagement. Peer J., 2018. Vol. 27, no. 6. DOI:10.7717/peerj.4676
  23. Jambunathan S., Burts D.C., Pierce S. Comparisons of parenting attitudes among five ethnic groups in the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2000. Vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 395—406. DOI:10.3138/jcfs.31.4.395
  24. Keller H. Universality claim of attachment theory: Children’s socioemotional development across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018. Vol. 115, no. 45, pp. 11414—11419. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1720325115
  25. Kochanska G., Friesenborg A.E., Lange L.A., Martel M.M., Kochanska G. Parents’ personality and infants’ temperament as contributors to their emerging relationship. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2004. Vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 744—59. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.744
  26. Kochanska G., Boldt L.J., Goffin K.C. Early Relational experience: a foundation for the unfolding dynamics of parent-child socialization. Child development perspectives, 2019. Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 41—47. DOI:10.1111/cdep.12308
  27. Madigan S., Prime H., Graham S.A., Rodrigues M., Anderson N., Khoury J., Jenkins J.M. Parenting Behavior and Child Language: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 2019. Vol. 144, no. 4. DOI:10.1542/peds.2018-3556
  28. McLeod B.D., Sutherland K.S., Martinez R.G., Conroy M.A., Snyder P.A., Southam-Gerow M.A. Identifying Common Practice Elements to Improve Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Outcomes of Young Children in Early Childhood Classrooms. Prevention science: the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2017. Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 204—213. DOI:10.1007/s11121-016-0703-y
  29. Mejia A., Leijten P., Lachman J.M., Parra-Cardona J.R. Different Strokes for Different Folks? Contrasting Approaches to Cultural Adaptation of Parenting Interventions. Prevention science: the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2017. Vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 630—639. DOI:10.1007/s11121-016-0671-2
  30. Rindermann H., Hoang Q.S.N., Baumeister A.E.E. Cognitive ability, parenting and instruction in Vietnam and Germany. Intelligence, 2013. Vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 366—377. DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2013.05.011
  31. Roos L.E. (ed.). Supporting families to protect child health: Parenting quality and household needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 2021. Vol. 16, no. 5. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0251720
  32. Sameroff A. (ed.). The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other. American Psychological Association, 2009. DOI:10.1037/11877-000
  33. Sanders M.R., Turner K.M.T., Metzler C.W. Applying Self-Regulation Principles in the Delivery of Parenting Interventions. Clinical child and family psychology review, 2019. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 24—42. DOI:10.1007/s10567-019-00287-z
  34. Savina E., Wan K. Cultural Pathways to Socio-Emotional Development and Learning. Journal of Relationships Research, 2017. Vol. 8. DOI:10.1017/jrr.2017.19
  35. Shaw D.S., Galán C.A., Lemery-Chalfant K., Dishion T.J., Elam K.K., Wilson M.N., Gardner F. Trajectories and Predictors of Children’s Early-Starting Conduct Problems: Child, Family, Genetic, and Intervention Effects. Development and psychopathology, 2019. Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1911—1921. DOI:10.1017/S0954579419000828
  36. Shockley K., Santana M.V., Fowler C.A. Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2003. Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 326—332. DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326
  37. Wachs T.D., McCrae R.R., Kohnstamm G.A., Kohnstamm G.A. (Eds.). Temperament in Context (ed.). Psychology Press, 2001. DOI:10.4324/9781410600967
  38. Weisberg D.S., Hirsh-Pasek K., Golinkoff R.M. Embracing complexity: Rethinking the relation between play and learning: Comment on Lillard et al. Psychological Bulletin, 2013. Vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 35—39. DOI:10.1037/a0030077
  39. Lin X., Li H., Yang W. Bridging a Cultural Divide Between Play and Learning: Parental Ethnotheories of Young Children’s Play and Their Instantiation in Contemporary China. Early Education and Development, 2019. Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 82—97. DOI:10.1080/10409289.2018.1514846

Information About the Authors

Tatyana V. Shinina, PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Neuro- and Pathopsychology, Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5572-9104, e-mail: shininaTV78@gmail.com

Inna G. Morozova, PhD student (Psychology), Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-097X, e-mail: inna.opinion@gmail.com

Tuyet L. Nguyen, Rector, National Pedagogical College of Nha Trang, Nha Trang, Vietnam, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-4779, e-mail: lannt06@gmail.com